Re: wininet: Support http_proxy environment variable

2006-08-11 Thread Francois Gouget
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Augusto Arcoverde da Rocha wrote: [...] Yes, it's supported but isn't a standart and has no guaranties to exists on all architectures as Alexander said in a reply in this list $http_proxy and $ftp_proxy may not be very well documented but they are defacto standards and as

Re: wininet: Support http_proxy environment variable

2006-08-11 Thread Augusto Arcoverde da Rocha
On 8/11/06, Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Augusto Arcoverde da Rocha wrote: [...] Yes, it's supported but isn't a standart and has no guaranties to exists on all architectures as Alexander said in a reply in this list $http_proxy and $ftp_proxy may not be very

Re: wininet: Support http_proxy environment variable

2006-08-11 Thread Francois Gouget
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Augusto Arcoverde da Rocha wrote: [...] But, I have read in somewhere a reply from Alexander about avoiding environment variables. However, I can't find this message again. Maybe you are thinking about the one in which he argues against introducing new obsucure

Re: wininet: Support http_proxy environment variable

2006-08-10 Thread Francois Gouget
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Augusto Arcoverde da Rocha wrote: Exists a opened bug report about the problem which this patch is suposed to fix: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5625 Can someone give some comments for what this pach wasn't applied? As far as I can see the patch seems to assume

Re: wininet: Support http_proxy environment variable

2006-08-10 Thread Dimi Paun
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 13:33 +0200, Francois Gouget wrote: There may also be a way to specify a password ('[EMAIL PROTECTED]'?). Format is: [user[:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:port] -- Dimi Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lattica, Inc.

Re: wininet: Support http_proxy environment variable

2006-08-10 Thread Augusto Arcoverde da Rocha
Hu... Then a better approach would be avoid environment variables, as this seems to be a Wine development directive, and use the right format for the proxy configuration string. Can someone point more questions about Wine proxy configuration which could improve that patch? Regards, Augusto

Re: wininet: Support http_proxy environment variable

2006-08-10 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi, Dimi Paun wrote: On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 13:33 +0200, Francois Gouget wrote: There may also be a way to specify a password ('[EMAIL PROTECTED]'?). Format is: [user[:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:port] If I google for http_proxy, I always find this additionally prefixed by http://;. Some have

Re: wininet: Support http_proxy environment variable

2006-08-10 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi, Augusto Arcoverde da Rocha wrote: Hu... Then a better approach would be avoid environment variables, as this seems to be a Wine development directive, and use the right format for the proxy configuration string. I disagree. I think it makes sense to support general environment

Re: wininet: Support http_proxy environment variable

2006-08-10 Thread Augusto Arcoverde da Rocha
On 8/10/06, Tobias Burnus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Augusto Arcoverde da Rocha wrote: Hu... Then a better approach would be avoid environment variables, as this seems to be a Wine development directive, and use the right format for the proxy configuration string. I disagree. I

Re: wininet: Support http_proxy environment variable

2006-08-10 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi, Augusto Arcoverde da Rocha schrieb: IMHO, the current password exposition is a ugly thing: $ export http_proxy=http://user:__**password**[EMAIL PROTECTED]:8080 I wouldn't worry to much about a PROXY password. I mean who can access files and environment variables? Basically only you and the

Re: wininet: Support http_proxy environment variable

2006-08-03 Thread Augusto Arcoverde da Rocha
Exists a opened bug report about the problem which this patch is suposed to fix: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5625 Can someone give some comments for what this pach wasn't applied? Thanks, Augusto Arcoverde da Rocha