On So, 2008-11-02 at 10:58 -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
This approach won't help users of the Wine conformance
tests running on Windows,
Sure it would; just make the test server setup script run on cygwin properly.
require an installed cygwin is broken by design.
winetest.exe is a standalone
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Detlef Riekenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This approach won't help users of the Wine conformance
tests running on Windows,
Sure it would; just make the test server setup script run on cygwin properly.
require an installed cygwin is broken by design.
On Friday 31 October 2008 16:11:58 Hans Leidekker wrote:
On Friday 31 October 2008 15:52:43 James Mckenzie wrote:
What happened to your /etc/hosts proposal? It has the
advantage that we don't need changes to Wine source code.
This would not work on Macs as /etc/hosts is locked to admins
2008/10/31 Dan Kegel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The public internet can (and does) go pear-shaped
in the middle of test runs, which means any test
that tries to access the public internet is de facto
flaky, even if it tries to protect itself by skipping
if the internet is down.
So let's provide a
Rob wrote:
Later we should provide a script to set up
a local test server that can handle all of
our conformance tests' requests, but for
now, just letting patchwatcher or winetest
redirect everything to localhost will let tests
fail reliably instead of randomly.
This approach won't help
On Friday 31 October 2008 12:45:58 Dan Kegel wrote:
The public internet can (and does) go pear-shaped
in the middle of test runs, which means any test
that tries to access the public internet is de facto
flaky, even if it tries to protect itself by skipping
if the internet is down.
So
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Hans Leidekker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What happened to your /etc/hosts proposal? It has the
advantage that we don't need changes to Wine source code.
But the disadvantage that we need to know
which servers the test code is going to look up.
I guess I should
On Friday 31 October 2008 13:39:36 Dan Kegel wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Hans Leidekker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What happened to your /etc/hosts proposal? It has the
advantage that we don't need changes to Wine source code.
But the disadvantage that we need to know
which
Hans Leidekker [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Oct 31, 2008 5:32 AM wrote about Re:
wininet: let automated testers force all DNS lookups to return localhost
Only include this in debugging builds.
What happened to your /etc/hosts proposal? It has the
advantage that we don't need changes to Wine
2008/10/31 James Mckenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This would not work on Macs as /etc/hosts is locked to admins only and would
be a problem to implement.
I don't see how that's a problem, or how that's different from eg. Linux.
More on-topic, I don't think it would be hard to do some LD_PRELOAD
On Friday 31 October 2008 15:52:43 James Mckenzie wrote:
What happened to your /etc/hosts proposal? It has the
advantage that we don't need changes to Wine source code.
This would not work on Macs as /etc/hosts is locked to admins only and would
be a problem to implement.
That's true for
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Hans Leidekker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I think this could use a bit of standardization. Perhaps
we could have a scheme like this:
http.test.winehq.org
ftp.test.winehq.org
ldap.test.winehq.org
pop3.test.winehq.org
...
And mandate that networked
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Henri Verbeet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/10/31 James Mckenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This would not work on Macs as /etc/hosts is locked to admins only and would
be a problem to implement.
I don't see how that's a problem, or how that's different from eg.
2008/10/31 Dan Kegel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How would we do this on Windows? (We need the
winetest results to be reliable, too.)
That was the main reason I didn't go for LD_PRELOAD...
I guess we do some sort of DLL injection, but I haven't done
it personally before.
- Dan
You could patch the
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Henri Verbeet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/10/31 Dan Kegel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How would we do this on Windows? (We need the
winetest results to be reliable, too.)
That was the main reason I didn't go for LD_PRELOAD...
I guess we do some sort of DLL
15 matches
Mail list logo
