Re: [WinPcap-users] 3-clause vs. 4-clause BSD license for {libp,WinP}cap and {tcpd,WinD}ump

2004-07-06 Thread Guy Harris
On Jul 4, 2004, at 4:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thankyou Guy and Loris for responding to my query and clarifying the thread of licences. I am assuming from what you say that I cannot re-distribute WinPcap and WinDump legally unless I mention the respective statements in "all" descriptions of

Re: [WinPcap-users] 3-clause vs. 4-clause BSD license for {libp,WinP}cap and {tcpd,WinD}ump

2004-07-04 Thread lists
thankyou Guy and Loris for responding to my query and clarifying the thread of licences. I am assuming from what you say that I cannot re-distribute WinPcap and WinDump legally unless I mention the respective statements in "all" descriptions of the Windows Toolbox project, which sadly is too

Re: [WinPcap-users] 3-clause vs. 4-clause BSD license for {libp,WinP}cap and {tcpd,WinD}ump

2004-06-29 Thread Loris Degioanni
The same applies to the code written by us (the Netgroup at polito). The licence of our code is the one at http://winpcap.polito.it/misc/copyright.htm (although some pieces of code still have the 4 clauses licence, but we can remove it without problems). "Our code" means: - the different versions

[WinPcap-users] 3-clause vs. 4-clause BSD license for {libp,WinP}cap and {tcpd,WinD}ump

2004-06-28 Thread Guy Harris
On Jun 28, 2004, at 1:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We would like to include WinPcap and WinDump on the Windows Toolbox compilation of software but your licencing restrictions present a problem. The clause we have difficulty with in particular is this: "all advertising materials mentioning fea