On 2/14/20 11:27 PM, Eiji Tanioka wrote:
> Hi, Samuel.
>
> Thank you for your reply!
> I re-created patch.
Thanks, applied:
https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-android/commit/?id=822f72df956ecd3aaa6a2b254e059e38ba5122e4
___
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@
On 2/13/20 4:31 AM, Eiji Tanioka wrote:
> This patch is Japanese translation for wireguard-android.
Thank you for the patch!
Yes, `git format-patch` and sending to this list is how we're currently
accepting contributions to the Android app.
Next time, please also include your Signed-off-by: line
You might also want to check out https://pypi.org/project/wgnlpy/ which is a
Wireguard configuration library for python.
~Derrick • iPhone
> On Feb 14, 2020, at 3:02 AM, Barrett Strausser wrote:
>
>
> I don't doubt that it can handle 1M peers.
>
> My question was more concerned with can an
On Fri, 2020-02-14 at 12:17 +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Except the command line arguments have length limits you'll hit
> anyway. Wouldn't the better way to do this be passing a config file
> to
> `wg setconf wg0 /dev/stdin`?
Yes, they would be better. However each command has slight
ineffi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello,
A new version, v0.0.20200215, of the backported WireGuard kernel module for
3.10 <= Linux <= 5.5.y has been tagged in the git repository.
Please note that until Linux 5.6 is released, this snapshot is a
snapshot rather than a secure final re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello,
A new version, v0.0.20200214, of the backported WireGuard kernel module for
3.10 <= Linux <= 5.5.y has been tagged in the git repository.
Please note that until Linux 5.6 is released, this snapshot is a
snapshot rather than a secure final re
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 1:15 AM Hristo Venev wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2020-02-08 at 23:20 +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > Trying to get a handle on the use case for this.
>
> I am working on a program [1] that configures a WireGuard interface by
> invoking `wg`. Generally there are multiple peers, a
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 12:23 AM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Thank for the patch, and nice hanging with you at FOSDEM.
>
> Trying to get a handle on the use case for this. Is this so that you
> can put the private key and the preshared key in a single file
> together? Is there a situation where th
The config file stays the same. The configuration breaks when I define a
default gateway in my network settings (in order to have the Windows
machine connected to the Internet). From that moment on, the packages
destined to the other ethernet port (the one where the default gateway not
is) are show
Hello,
bellow is another occurance of the bug. At 17:19 server was rebooted
because of updates.
The process C:\windows\system32\svchost.exe (bserver) has initiated the
restart of computer bserver on behalf of user NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM for the
following reason: Operating System: Service pack (Plann
Hi Jason,
Jason A. Donenfeld wrote on Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 05:31:41PM +0100:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 5:50 AM Stephen Gregoratto
> wrote:
>> +.TH WG-QUICK 8 "2019-02-13" ZX2C4 "WireGuard"
> It's 2020 now, but what would you think of retaining the original
> date? Or do you usually bump it on
Seems reasonable, but please resubmit with your Signed-off-by: line.
___
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
I don't doubt that it can handle 1M peers.
My question was more concerned with can an *Organization *perform the
configuration management to handle 1M peers if all configuration is through
a static IP.
If I have 1M peers and . have no change per day, that still leaves 100
changes or ~4 per ho
I think I found the problem, there is a typo in my iptable command. While
editing with vi, I may have added additional i in the end of MASQUERADE. I
removed it and restarted it. Now I am monitoring for issues.
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 10:55, Kunal Shah wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Thanks for your respons
Hi Jason,
Thanks for your response. After the changes you suggested, It still gives
me the same problem. Now my GCP server wireguard configuration looks like
this.
[Interface]
Address = 192.168.1.1
SaveConfig = true
PostUp = iptables -A FORWARD -i %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -A FORWARD -o %i -j
ACCEPT
This patch is Japanese translation for wireguard-android.
---
app/src/main/res/values-ja/strings.xml | 300 -
1 file changed, 150 insertions(+), 150 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/src/main/res/values-ja/strings.xml
b/app/src/main/res/values-ja/strings.xml
index 336cd4e..2
From: sebcbi1
Android : Change functionality in excluded apps dialog for better user
experience when user wants only one or few apps to use wireguard
Please review italian and russian translation
---
.../com/wireguard/android/fragment/AppListDialogFragment.java | 4 ++--
app/src/main/res/value
On Sat, 2020-02-08 at 23:20 +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Trying to get a handle on the use case for this.
I am working on a program [1] that configures a WireGuard interface by
invoking `wg`. Generally there are multiple peers, and some of them may
have preshared keys.
Currently the most re
Hello,
I recently started to use WireGuard, this is great product.
I have Galaxy S9, iPad Pro, MacbookAir, and all of they can use WireGuard
Tunnel.
It is useful for me.
I want to contribute this product, but I can't write code, I don't have
build environment, so what can I do?
I can translate to
Hi Samir,
I didn't realize this. You convinced me on this one. Thanks!
On 2/14/20 15:11, Samir Nassar wrote:
Hello,
from https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/docs/syzbot.md
"syzbot system continuously fuzzes main Linux kernel branches and automatically
reports found bugs to kernel
Hi Eric,
On 2/14/20, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> If wireguard device mtu is set to zero, a divide by zero
> crash happens in calculate_skb_padding().
>
> This patch provides dev->min_mtu and dev->max_mtu bounds.
Thanks for the patch. However, I solved this slightly differently
yesterday afternoon alre
21 matches
Mail list logo