Hello Debian Install System Team,
there used to be Linux install parties - a very cool event in itself and
a way to bring new users into community. However it is not so easy to
organize and it is somewhat limiting in time and space.
Several weeks ago I learned about the kernel-space VPN -
tro? Version?
>
> --
> Sent from my telephone.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018, 12:36 ST <smn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have
> ...
> Address = 192.168.4.1/24
> SaveConfig = true
> in wg0.conf
&
Debian 8 Jessie
iproute2/oldstable,now 3.16.0-2 amd64
On Fri, 2018-04-20 at 21:39 +, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Out of date iproute2?
>
>
> Which distro? Version?
>
> --
> Sent from my telephone.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018, 12:36 ST <smn...@gma
Hello,
I have
...
Address = 192.168.4.1/24
SaveConfig = true
in wg0.conf
1. if I add a peer with `wg set wg0 peer ...` WG doesn't add it
immediately to the wg0.conf file, only after I run `wg-quick down wg0`.
Why not? What happens if the system crashes unexpectedly?... The peer
will not be
What uses unauthenticated TCP - your demo.wireguard.com script or DHCP?
On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 06:04 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> The problem is that it uses unauthenticated TCP.
___
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
Hi Jason,
On Mon, 2018-04-16 at 00:37 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi ST,
>
> It's a cool idea using the file system like that (the sticky bit would
> make the permissions part work correctly, perhaps), though I wonder if
> it's a bit complicated. If the model you're
:
> Hi ST,
>
> It's a cool idea using the file system like that (the sticky bit would
> make the permissions part work correctly, perhaps), though I wonder if
> it's a bit complicated. If the model you're after is simply "server
> allocates IPs for peers already kno
Hi,
after recent searching/thinking about how to span a VPN from a single
publicly visible server with automatic collision-free IPs
assignment/peers' public data sharing, I came to following scheme.
Please provide your feedback on what possible improvements/security
holes/pitfalls might be...
On Sun, 2018-04-15 at 01:15 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi Luiz,
>
> You could indeed arrange for something like this, either directly --
> if both IPs are accessible
Which IPs do you mean here? Public IPs or private VPN IPs (i.e. those
defined within WireGuard configuration)? I got an
Hello,
as mentioned earlier I'm looking for ways to automate IPs assignment and
more general - addition of new peers into a VPN through a central WG
server.
It was suggested to use DHCP server/client. Are there tutorials
somewhere on how to do that?
Maybe you are aware of other
> from https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2018-April/002595.html:
> > PS: you write that the "tool does not handle collisions", but does it
> > recognize and/or warn about them? I.e. if a peer with the newly
> > suggested IP exists already - will it warn?
>
> No, no detection is
PS: you write that the "tool does not handle collisions", but does it
recognize and/or warn about them? I.e. if a peer with the newly
suggested IP exists already - will it warn?
For automation it would be nice to have some sort of "force" or
"keep-trying" options, so the tool regenerates the keys
Hi Christophe-Marie,
I'm interested in it being integrated into WG, as it is exactly what I
asked for in this list several weeks ago.
Thank you!
On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 14:32 +0200, Christophe-Marie Duquesne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In an old thread [1], danrl suggested deriving node addresses from the
On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 20:46 +0200, Luis Ressel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Low-level tools such as wg aren't the right place for the "automagic"
> features you're suggesting. wg should have simple, bugproof code and
> behave reliably and predictably so that it can serve as a solid
> foundation for all
On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 15:15 -0400, wiregu...@eldondev.com wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 08:17:17PM +0300, ST wrote:
> > 1. Labels.
> >
> > Is it possible to add an optional label to a peer to make it a bit more
> > usable for humans (who tend not to rem
Hello,
as I mentioned before I'm learning WireGuard and there are certain
things that I need but didn't find them yet in the docs (either because
I didn't read enough yet or because it's just not there). I'll list them
here and you'll tell whether it is worth for a new feature or not; or
whether
On Sun, 2018-03-25 at 21:17 +0200, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 8:10 PM, ST <smn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > PS: if you have over 100 peers it is a bit a headache to find a free IP
> > when adding a new peer. There is no reason WG could not scan through IPs
On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 00:43 +0800, Wang Jian wrote:
> 2018-03-25 3:32 GMT+08:00 ST <smn...@gmail.com>:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm learning WireGuard and have a question regarding adding/removing a
> > peer.
> >
> > Is there something like:
> >
>
On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 00:43 +0800, Wang Jian wrote:
> 2018-03-25 3:32 GMT+08:00 ST <smn...@gmail.com>:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm learning WireGuard and have a question regarding adding/removing a
> > peer.
> >
> > Is there something like:
> >
>
Hello,
I'm learning WireGuard and have a question regarding adding/removing a
peer.
Is there something like:
1) wg add peer ABCDEF... allowed-ips 192.168.88.0/24 endpoint
209.202.254.14:8172
and by default, if some(/all) values are not provided - WG will generate
them on its own. E.g. if IP is
Hello,
I'm new to networking in general and VPN in particular but need to setup
infrastructure to be able to SSH easily to several people who are behind
routers (NAT). After reading that WireGuard is super simple - I decided
to give it try.
It indeed turned out to be simple till now. I setup a
21 matches
Mail list logo
