On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 20:46 +0200, Luis Ressel wrote: > Hello, > > Low-level tools such as wg aren't the right place for the "automagic" > features you're suggesting. wg should have simple, bugproof code and > behave reliably and predictably so that it can serve as a solid > foundation for all sorts of high-level scripts. > > Of course, this doesn't mean your suggested features would be useless > -- they just don't belong into the same binary as the low-level stuff. > Build a script to handle the boring IP assignments for you, and if you > believe it might be useful to others, by all means publish it!
Agreed. I remember that I read in the docs that some of the WG's tools are of higher level. So I thought that automatic IP assignment could belong to them. Probably it was wg-quick, but `wg set ...` is seemingly a low-level stuff. Now I see. Thank you! _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard