All,
As quoted in the article;
Consumers are going beyond simple emails or Web
surfing, and moving into music and movie downloads. But that kind of
activity requires more
bandwidth, and is driving the migration to faster service.
Full article here;
OMFG
stunned silence
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dawn DiPietro
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 6:31 PM
To: WISPA General List;
Hey Guys;
I'm planning to use a Valemount Star OS type system in my WISP start up, and have just a few questions:
My network design uses aCisco 1750 router, Cisco 2950 switch to plug up to 4 base radio's into (Whoa ...16 antennas), Radius server, Sniffer, and a www server for my Intranet
Assuming you are talking WAR board platform V3, the boards already come
licensed, so no extra cost and you can populate from 1 to 4 cards per board.
As for configuring the boards, yes, you have to configure the boards to
your needs. And I thought that Lonnie had a storefront and sold singles.
I
And, I have two of the WAR 533mhz boards for sale cheap on Ebay. Search
on WAR 533mhz. :)
Travis
Microserv
George Rogato wrote:
Assuming you are talking WAR board platform V3, the boards already
come licensed, so no extra cost and you can populate from 1 to 4 cards
per board.
As for
Thanks Trav!
Lee
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 18:12:46 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] A little help, or 20 questions... which ever you preferr And,IhavetwooftheWAR533mhzboardsforsalecheaponEbay.Search on"WAR533mhz".:) Travis Microserv GeorgeRogatowrote:
http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-6067971.htmlWASHINGTON--Broadband providers and Internet phone companies will
have to pick up the tab for the cost of building in mandatory wiretap
access for police surveillance, federal regulators ruled Wednesday.Ooof. So we not only have to ensure that the
Hi,
This really isn't that hard. Put a fully manageable switch in front of
your backbone router to the internet and mirror the port(s). Done.
We do this already to gather stats and find infected customers.
Travis
Microserv
Dylan Oliver wrote:
http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-6067971.html
Net Neutrality to me means preventing the large backbone providers
(ATT, etc.) from deciding whose packets will be allowed to use the
Internet and how much extra it will cost to use the Internet, assuming
that you are allowed to use it. Packets from sites can be (as I
understand it) not just
I haven't seen any of the technical specifications that this would
call for. Sure, easy enough to mirror a port.
Are the requirements just that? So that law enforcement can come plug
in and 'tap' your network? Or do they require access from anywhere so
that they can, at any instance get that
While I agree with the basic concept of net neutrality, I wonder what
will happen with IPTV-VOD and the stress it puts on a broadband
providers network.
If there is any application that I can think of that changes the rules
of net neutrality it would be IPTV. I understand some will say you
To All,
Any one know anthing about Navini Networks and all their claims? sounds too good to be true.
Ron Wallace
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Ron Wallace wrote:
To All,
Any one know anthing about Navini Networks and all their claims? sounds
too good to be true.
Ron Wallace
I'd like to know as well how it performs and their success rate. It's
been out awhile now.
I do know that Navini and Vivato were supposed to be
Ron Wallace wrote:
To All,
Any one know anthing about Navini Networks and all their claims? sounds
too good to be true.
Ron Wallace
I think the techniques are great ideas, wish I could get some smart
antennas to work with an atheros card.
George
--
WISPA Wireless List:
George,
What do you know about them?-Original Message-From: George Rogato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2006 11:29 PMTo: 'WISPA General List'Subject: Re: [WISPA] (no subject)Ron Wallace wrote: To All, Any one know anthing about Navini Networks and all their claims?
Hi Ron
I don't know much except what has come across these list since the stuff
came out.
I seem to recall a couple of wisps saying they've installed them and
being successful. I don't recall that they were very fast at all.
Some of the municipalities have deployed them, I think maybe
I did just send an inquiy in for their new unlicensed wimax product due
out Q4 last year.
George
http://www.navini.com/pages/contact/moreinfo.asp
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives:
Title: Message
Vaporware baby !
JohnnyO
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ron WallaceSent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 10:22 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; wireless@wispa.org;
isp-wireless@isp-wireless.comSubject: [WISPA] (no
Hi,
The flip side is that you are selling a customer a connection. That is
how YOU are making your money... why do you care what they run over it?
Does it matter if it's IPTV or doing an FTP file transfer?
However, I really don't think this is going to affect the smaller
operators. This
It seems like it is time to bill by the packet.
Or at least by groups of packets as in 2 Gigs for $39.
Many clients don;t like this kind of billing, but it is likely the only
way you can do anything about IPTV.
If you have sold someone a 384k unmetered connection, and they decide to
If Google wants to be faster, let them buy more T-3s or more peering, or
whatever-don't screw with packet priority...
John
Travis Johnson wrote:
Hi,
The flip side is that you are selling a customer a connection. That is
how YOU are making your money... why do you care what they run over
21 matches
Mail list logo
