Umthanks Patrick. :^) I'm not afraid to appreciate you for what
you have done for us and the challenge you put before us.
With regards to the big money types, I have some additional
perspective from a slightly different viewpoint.
The big money is definitely coming in this direction.
-- Original Message --
To: WISPA General List (wireless@wispa.org)
From: Patrick Leary ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: [WISPA] My Hypothetical Conversation with Julius Knapp, Chief of OET
Date: 2/8/2007 12:48:20p
What should I say next time I'm before people like Julie Knapp, who
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 11:14 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] My Hypothetical Conversation with Julius Knapp,
ChiefofOET
Marlon,
I was just trying to determine if the problems
In all this conversation... the big guys wanting stiff enforcement to protect
them from the death by a thousand cuts as small guys innovate by making their
own equipment, and the arguments over the government's enforcement ability or
will, sort of miss the point.
We need regulations that
Ok some one buy this guy a drink, well said, exactly what we need.
You have a Good Day now,
Carl A Jeptha
http://www.airnet.ca
Office Phone: 905 349-2084
Office Hours: 9:00am - 5:00pm
skype cajeptha
Mark Koskenmaki wrote:
In all this conversation... the big guys wanting stiff enforcement
Matt,
Nice post. This is exactly what the two-way radio, paging and
cellular/pcs
industries did. For those of us who were around to witness that, this is
familiar territory. If you need some tools to help you manage your big
projects hit me off list. Might be able to save you some hair
All,
RFP to be put out in March.
Regards,
Dawn DiPietro
Posted on Fri, Feb. 09, 2007
Wireless proposal advances
Johnson County will ask providers to submit bids on creating a
countywide network.
By FINN BULLERS
The Kansas City Star
In the future, computer users in Johnson County could be
I have had great success turning competitors interference into a civil matter.
I already put one WISP out of business who was running one watt amps on 21dbi
grid antennas 15 degrees apart, he had few customers but did it to make the
floor so dirty no one else could play. Without getting
Motorola Acquires Netopia, Inc.
By Niladri Sekhar Nath
TMCnet Contributing Editor
Motorola (News - Alert), Inc., has acquired Netopia, Inc. Netopia
provides carrier-class broadband customer premise equipment (CPE),
remote management software, and services to telecom operators worldwide.
Has anyone installed the Waverider mobile units in vehicles? How long
did it take, any pitfalls to watch out for?
Thanks
Chris Cooper
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives:
http://energycommerce.house.gov/Press_110/110-resp.FCC.020707.Chairman.resp%20to%20our%2013107%20ltr.pdf
See page seven, second to last paragraph;
The Commission is also considering an order that would classify wireless
broadband Internet access service as an information service...
Frank
He is talking about cellular broadband, not UL wireless.
Frank Muto wrote:
http://energycommerce.house.gov/Press_110/110-resp.FCC.020707.Chairman.resp%20to%20our%2013107%20ltr.pdf
See page seven, second to last paragraph;
The Commission is also considering an order that would classify
This is ideal. I'd like to mention that, while they were reviewing part
15 , there was discussion with the FCC of people being able to become
certified or licensed to work with the equipment. Whatever happened to
that?
Mark Koskenmaki wrote:
In all this conversation... the big guys
Hi Dawn,
Where do you see this impacting WISPs?
Maybe Netopia's eCare and NBBS Service Management Platform are rolled into
Prizm?
Best,
--
Dylan Oliver
Primaverity, LLC
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
.. I calculated how many customers I had to cut back to keep them
interference ..
You did what?
Best,
--
Dylan Oliver
Primaverity, LLC
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives:
Hey it was 5:30 AM when I wrote that :) What I meant to say was I calculated
how many people I would have on an average bridge, reinforced that with site
survey requests and then the number of calls I went on because of interference
which I blamed completely on him. See I can make a short
All,
I got the impression Martin did not have WISP's in mind when he made
this decision.
As quoted from the article;
He added it also would “establish a consistent regulatory framework
across broadband platforms.” This is the same rationale Martin has used
to support deregulation of DSL,
And you may be right and that is my point in drawing out this answer Martin
made to the committee. He also states the reclass would eliminate
unnecessary regulatory barriers and clarifications of such, though he does
not provide an example. And if his agenda for this reclass does only effect
That's a fair and excellent approach Forbes and one I've suggested to a
number of legal operators. It might sound harsh to some, but it's the
risk that operator decided to accept when they made their technology and
configuration decisions.
Patrick
From:
Thanks Patrick, the nicest part of it is that it doesn't invite the FCC to look
at our system. Some days the best defense is a good offense. I don't find it
harsh, just a cost of doing business and it sends a powerful message to other
WISP's who think about it later since I got some good
Correct me if I am wrong. Wireless Broadband Internet has always been an
information service officiallyright?
Scriv
Frank Muto wrote:
http://energycommerce.house.gov/Press_110/110-resp.FCC.020707.Chairman.resp%20to%20our%2013107%20ltr.pdf
See page seven, second to last paragraph;
The
If there is a true distinction could you please point it out? I would
like to see where the line is drawn and what importance, if any, this
has to do with our industry?
Scriv
Peter R. wrote:
He is talking about cellular broadband, not UL wireless.
Frank Muto wrote:
I know of four WISPs that used to have smaller operations that within
the last month each received over $10 million in new money. I know of
several others doing some aggressive consolidation, buying out smaller
WISPs.
This past week in fact I had one such WISP owner ask me directly for
help
Agreed.
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Forbes Mercy
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 9:07 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] RE: Who Needs Enforcement when we have Civil
Action?
Thanks Patrick, the nicest part of it
I am sorry to look stupid here guys but I am missing the point. Please
spell it out for me like I am a pre-schooler. I am not grasping the
finer points being made. What is it about Martin's answer that will have
any effect on us or other licensed wireless broadband industries.
Thanks,
Scriv
make that 5. I just hooked up with a couple of retired guys from Motorola,
and we've found 4 investors willing to pony up some serious ($3MM) cash
over the next 3 yrs.
One of them actually suggested installing VL soon. :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
In case anyone wasn't already aware... we are interested in talking to
anyone who wants to sell.
-Matt
Patrick Leary wrote:
I know of four WISPs that used to have smaller operations that within
the last month each received over $10 million in new money. I know of
several others doing some
Congratulations Rick! Nice networking. Ex Motorola guys recommending VL
is not as strange and uncommon as one might think. No one knows the real
skinny like former employees.
Anyway, I'm obviously biased but the combination of version 4.0 and the
price points I've established with the
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:52:51 -0900
Subject:
RE: [WISPA] Another expert heard from.
Yes, but that's with the self-install indoor CPE, right? Nothing
outdoors except the
Scriv,
The particular paragraph that I pointed out that this was timely because
of the 700MHz Auction. After reading the pdf file that Frank posted it
looks like Martin feels that there is enough UL spectrum in the 5Ghz
range to last WiFi providers far into the future. Martin did comment on
Jack,
I checked this morning as promised. We use Compliance Certification
Services out of Morgan Hill, CA (far south Bay area). Apparently we have
used them for years and our guys say they are responsive and good.
Patrick Leary
AVP WISP Markets
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Patrick,
Thanks so much for sharing this information.
I hope others will share as well.
jack
Patrick Leary wrote:
Jack,
I checked this morning as promised. We use Compliance Certification
Services out of Morgan Hill, CA (far south Bay area). Apparently we have
used them for years and our
My pleasure Jack.
Patrick Leary
AVP WISP Markets
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 10:41 AM
To: WISPA General
INLINE
Dawn DiPietro wrote:
Scriv,
The particular paragraph that I pointed out that this was timely
because of the 700MHz Auction. After reading the pdf file that Frank
posted it looks like Martin feels that there is enough UL spectrum in
the 5Ghz range to last WiFi providers far into the
Mobile Broadband Gets Real
FEBRUARY 7, 2007
After years of talk, trials and delays, mobile broadband is becoming a
reality, thanks largely to 3G.
It has been a long time coming, but mobile wireless broadband is finally
moving beyond early adoption, according to the latest report on
Harold Feld puts his spin it at http://www.wetmachine.com/item/722
Wireless Broadband As Information Service: Brand X Is Not Enough
Frank Muto
Co-founder - Washington Bureau for ISP Advocacy - WBIA
- Original Message -
From: Dawn DiPietro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scriv,
The
On 2/8/07, Brian Whigham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 12:50 -0600, Matt wrote:
What I would like to know is what is the cheapest router that is
supported by OpenWRT?
I'd almost guarantee it's the Buffalo WHR-G54S. I've only one so far.
It's been at grandma's house doing a
Excuse me for asking, but do you mean a RB44 in an x86 platform?
(PCI to 4 port ethernet)
If so - I can comment! If not - I will shut up.
Mac Dearman
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Don Annas
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 7:05 PM
To:
Hi Mac,
I'm interested in what you have to say about RB44s in x86 ..
Along somewhat similar lines, I've been looking at Migrus C787 mini-ITX
boards with 3-port GE expansion cards. I'm assured that these are not 3-port
switch cards but that each of the 3 has its own MAC. I might put a couple in
39 matches
Mail list logo
