Portative filed. : **2007225097486**
David Hulsebus
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
> Good grief guys, there are only 12 new filings in the last week or
> so!!
>
> Why, in the name of God, would the FCC give a rats behind about our
> industry if we can't be bothered to talk to
That's good, and developing a political network in D.C. is imperative, but
it's not a part time job. WISPA needs to eventually outsource this job out.
It's a daily grind on the Hill to get in the right doors and see the right
people. This does not come cheap and one way or another WISPA needs th
2007225610045
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Filing complete. '2007225311218
Although, I avoided proposed rules details, as it was already well
expressed by other WISPA filers.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
actually. Don't laugh. We should talk.
In my new life as a company, I've got a Director of Sales on board that's a
(very) politically connected guy in Northern NJ as well as Washington.
I'm bringing him up to speed slowly, as I need him to get selling :) BUT,
one of the things I will do soon i
Alvarion, Inc. is listed as a Reply Commenter.
Frank
- Original Message -
From: "Marlon K. Schafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Is it enough ?
Patrick, you've been awfully quiet on this one. What are A
Patrick, you've been awfully quiet on this one. What are Alvarion's
thoughts? Have you guys filed on this matter?
Tranzeo, same question
Any other vendor members care to chime in here?
thanks,
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Muto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA Genera
Great post Frank!
thanks,
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Muto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Is it enough ?
In defense of WISPA and those who have previously filed, I do not think
you can state th
In defense of WISPA and those who have previously filed, I do not think you
can state this as a last minute cause for response. This has been an ongoing
[beneficial] cause for the WISP. The 04-186 NPRM was first filed by the
FCC's OET on 5/13/2004 with a First Order & Report w/Further NPRM filed
Filing complete. '2007225311218
Although, I avoided proposed rules details, as it was already well expressed
by other WISPA filers.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181" <[EMAIL PROTECT
Yeah, being on time is nice. And we've already filed a couple of times on
this issue over the years that it's been around.
It all takes time and I don't always have as much as it takes to learn the
issues, talk to others, work with others (like NAF, MAP, Cisco, Intel, ieee,
etc.).
If you'd
maybe WISPA needs to be describing these better, in advance as opposed to
the last minute...
if all our comments were the FIRST posted, wouldn't that look better?
What's out there that we should be looking at NOW as opposed to later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[
11 matches
Mail list logo
