LOL
You expect anything else from me?
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Dawn DiPietro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Happy Marlon Schafer Day!
Scriv,
He could have picked a better day, con
wow!
14 years apart. Congrats!
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Dawn DiPietro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Man I LOVE this wireless stuff!
Scriv,
There will be another DiPietro around
A few months? Are you finally going to give the boy a little sister?
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Dawn DiPietro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Man I LOVE this wireless stuff!
Marlon,
LOL
If only it didn't realistically need a -50somthing rssi! hehehehe
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Zack Kneisley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Power Lines in the LOS path
So just us
I use MT 2.9.32 currently on my Dell PowerEdge 350 (850 MHz w/ 512M Memory). I
am constantly pegging 6M of throughput, and that is around 2-8% CPU
utilization.
I have two guesses...
1) you are creating a network loop between switches (either 2 MT boxes or a MT
box and a cat5 cable between t
Hi,
What do you mean this only happens across the Mikrotik box? If you
by-pass the MT box, everything is fine?
Travis
Microserv
Ron Wallace wrote:
To All,
I have had a good system. I have a 3 Mbps Bonded T1, 100 users. Right now when I run a speed test to Speakeasy, it starts at 2.6 or2.7 mb
What version of MT? What do the interface stats show on the MT box when
it's slow?
Travis
Ron Wallace wrote:
Travis,
YES, Ihave an ethernet switch on either side of the MT box. On the Inet side, 2.7 Mb/s, on the Wireless side, beforethe MT box whenit seems loaded, that iswhen itsslow.
Travis,
YES, Ihave an ethernet switch on either side of the MT box. On the Inet side,
2.7 Mb/s, on the Wireless side, beforethe MT box whenit seems loaded, that
iswhen itsslow.
>-Original Message-
>From: Travis Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 06:31 PM
>To:
Good for you, Marlon, have a great weekend.
>-Original Message-
>From: Marlon K. Schafer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 03:15 PM
>To: 'WISPA General List'
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [WISPA] Man I LOVE this wireless stuff!
>
>Here I am, sitting at a picnic ben
To All,
I have had a good system. I have a 3 Mbps Bonded T1, 100 users. Right now when
I run a speed test to Speakeasy, it starts at 2.6 or2.7 mbps and quickly
windsdown to 15-20 kbps. This is only in the evening and from 7-9AM. I have a
MikroTik in P3 900MHz, w/ 500Mb of ram.
Thisonlyhappens ac
interesting article Matt TY.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 6:27 PM
Subject: [WISPA] MuniFi: Build it and they still don’t come?
http://gigaom.com/2007/04/10/munifi-build-it-and-they-still-dont-come/
-- WISPA Wireless Lis
We are seeing 2.2mb of actual throughput.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of chris cooper
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 11:21 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Trango 900
What is the non-vendor speak, actual production max through
Scriv,
He could have picked a better day, considering this is Friday the 13th.
Regards,
Dawn DiPietro
John Scrivner wrote:
Sounds like a good time Marlon. You have worked your tail end off
lately. Have some fun. Enjoy YOUR day!
I hereby proclaim this day, April 13th, to be Marlon Schafer Da
Scriv,
There will be another DiPietro around to one day troll the lists. ;-)
Regards,
Dawn DiPietro
John Scrivner wrote:
Dawn,
Is that a hint that there is a new baby DiPietro on the way?
Scriv
Dawn DiPietro wrote:
Marlon,
I am glad you are FINALLY taking some well deserved time off. Goo
Sounds like a good time Marlon. You have worked your tail end off
lately. Have some fun. Enjoy YOUR day!
I hereby proclaim this day, April 13th, to be Marlon Schafer Day in the
WISP world. Not that my proclamations mean anything! :-)We'll see
if anyone remembers this one next year. Happy
Dawn,
Is that a hint that there is a new baby DiPietro on the way?
Scriv
Dawn DiPietro wrote:
Marlon,
I am glad you are FINALLY taking some well deserved time off. Good
luck to the kids and no broken bones please. ;-) Have a rum and coke
for me as it will be a few months before I can have a
Peter R. wrote:
Turns out that VZ may not be the patent holder.
Tom Keating has some interesting insight.
And there is this patent: http://sabreean.com/?p=1421#more-1421
Yikes, Vonage gets whacked around from Verizon and what happens if it
turns out Verizon is not the patent holder?
--
WISP
http://www.tvtechnology.com/pages/s.0115/t.4857.html
--
Jack Unger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
FCC License # PG-12-25133
Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993
Author of the WISP Handbook - "Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs"
True Vendor-Neutral Wireless Con
Yes the noise will definitely reduce the capacity on your AP.
Chadd
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jack Unger
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 1:52 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trango 900
>
> ... and packet loss
Marlon,
I am glad you are FINALLY taking some well deserved time off. Good luck
to the kids and no broken bones please. ;-) Have a rum and coke for me
as it will be a few months before I can have any.
Regards,
Dawn DiPietro
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
Here I am, sitting at a picnic bench baskin
Here I am, sitting at a picnic bench basking in the cold mostly sunny day.
Banging out emails on my laptop via my hot spot that sits in the middle of a
cow pasture.
http://maps.live.com/?vendor=google&pkw=satellite%20images|617523751
I'm just east of the big gravel pile.
www.stumpjumpers.org
I don't know about the relativeness Blake. I don't know what the topic is.
If anyone else got a link in that first email I didn't...
Can anyone put this project into a 50 words or less summery?
thanks,
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Blake Bowers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA G
So just use OFDM EVERYWHERE!! :-)
On 4/13/07, Marlon K. Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ahhh. I tried one or two of the sl units. Just ordered some more. I like
them so far.
Think of multipath like a bad echo. If you've even stood in a completely
empty BIG room, like a grain elevator, wa
Ahhh. I tried one or two of the sl units. Just ordered some more. I like
them so far.
Think of multipath like a bad echo. If you've even stood in a completely
empty BIG room, like a grain elevator, warehouse etc. you know that it can
be hard to carry on a conversation with someone. The so
... and packet loss requires the packets to be retransmitted which takes
up additional timeslots which leads to a lowering of the overall
throughput capacity because some of the throughput-carrying timeslots
are used up by the retransmissions and therefore aren't available to
transport throughp
Turns out that VZ may not be the patent holder.
Tom Keating has some interesting insight.
And there is this patent: http://sabreean.com/?p=1421#more-1421
Rich Comroe wrote:
Latest New Vonage news from yesterday:
Vonage CEO resigns, cost-cutting moves planned
contains the interesting quotatio
I'm sure many of you will love this article:
http://wifinetnews.com/archives/007545.html
and many more including mine:
http://radinfo.blogspot.com/2007/04/muni-pile-on-week.html
Although I think that if Muni wi-fi fails, the WISP industry as a whole
will take a hit.
--
Regards,
Peter Rad
Latest New Vonage news from yesterday:
Vonage CEO resigns, cost-cutting moves planned
contains the interesting quotation:
... "on Friday it won a temporary reprieve from a court order prohibiting it
from signing up new customers" ... at least until April 24 when the next
hearing occurs.
http://w
Jim:
The term "multipath" is commonly used to describe the condition wherein a
sent signal "arrives" at an antenna through more than one path (by something
in addition to or other than a non-obstructed, line-of-sight link).
Microwave signals are subject to a number of degradation modes includin
Sounds about right, the other thing with higher noise levels is that you
will have packet loss. You can still have good throughput but you will have
packet loss.
Chadd
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Smith, Rick
> Sent: Friday, Apri
Storm Trojan reaches record proportions
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9016420&source=rss_news10
Malware outbreak 'largest in almost a year'
http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid14_gci1251304,00.html?track=sy160
Fr
Hey Jeff,
Send me an email; we've got some unifinished business
to attend to.
Kelly
--- Jeffrey Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> --
> WISPA Wireless List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.w
depending on noise floor, we get anywhere from 1 to 2.7 meg.
Highest I've EVER seen was 2.85 mbps - 2 miles out, with -59 signal.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of chris cooper
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 11:21 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
What is the non-vendor speak, actual production max throughput on a
Trango 900 Mhz AP?
Thanks
Chris
--
WISPA Wireless List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Thanks to all for the feedback!
I moved the radio to the top of the customer's barn and am now "looking"
over the power lines. When I first fired it up, it wouldn't associated, so
I started trying some of the other suggestions. I lowered the maximum
transmit power substantially and it actual
35 matches
Mail list logo
