tnx
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 11:34 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looking for short licensed link
Just a suggestion, but I would cross reference your cable loss settings
with
the
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just a suggestion, but I would cross reference your cable loss settings
with
the manual's guidelines.
Your flaky behavior could be due to the ODU being overdriven or starved
for
power. Then again if you've already had
If you like, please provide me the cable length and type on each end. Then
provide me the loss figures you have entered for each side. We'll compare
notes between yours and ours.
What version are you running?
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Brad Belton wrote:
If you like, please provide me the cable length and type on each end. Then
provide me the loss figures you have entered for each side. We'll compare
notes between yours and ours.
What version are you running?
Side A - 50' of LMR400 + 17' of RG58 (or 59, whatever the 50
Platypus by nature is very extensible and expandable. We have it control
every aspect of our wireless broadband service, having it talk so Mikrotiks,
Canopy Prizm, and the like, permitting access, controlling bandwidth,
assigning static IP addresses, etc.
Much of this capability is there
Hello Bryan,
Ok, you have definitely shorter cable runs than we do. The cable loss
settings may not be as important in your case, but why a split cable on Site
A? Twice the chance of connector problems at Site A. Any chance of
replacing the two cables at Site A with one LMR-400 cable?
I know
Dave, got a eta for 7.0?
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Sovereen
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 1:39 PM
To: WISPA General
I am looking to replace some T1 circuits with my wireless network. It would be
advantageous to have a complete Layer 2 link through my network from the
Ethernet port I hand to the client to the Ethernet port I hand off at the
provider's NOC. No IP monkey business for me to worry about.
What
Mike Hammett wrote:
I am looking to replace some T1 circuits with my wireless network.
What is the most transparent way to do this?
If the two points have IP connectivity, Mikrotik's ethernet-over-IP is
about as transparent as you can get. Last year, when we moved to our new
office, we left
Trango GigaLINK radios have eight wayside T1 circuits alongside four
independent copper GigE ports for data. If this is too pricy or overkill
then I would look into the RAD Data Communications Airmux-200. Gives you up
to four T1 ports along with Ethernet transport all in one package. Works
well
The network will be routed at every location I have equipment, but I need to
tunnel through. I won't be delivering Internet service but an Ethernet
local loop from their NOC to their clients.
I don't know much about MPLS, but will that allow them to have a standard
/30 connecting the NOC
I have used EoIP, but not extensively. I'm guessing it would be up to every
device between if I were to support a 1500 MTU through the EoIP tunnel.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: David E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's as easy as a PPTP tunnel utilizing MT.
They can do their own routing..etc and all you provide is the tunnel and
intranet access.
Mac
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 4:54 PM
To:
I got responses a little quicker than I thought. It looks like EoIP and
MPLS\VPLS will do what I want.
Differences... EoIP is Mikrotik only and has additional overhead?
It looks like I need to learn more about MPLS suggested sources? I've
looked at Mikrotik and Wikipedia's entries on the
So what are you guy finding regarding 18Ghz multi-path.
What we learned over this past year is that multipath for Millimeter Wave
and high Spectrum ranges, is a different animal.
Very picky. 18Ghz specifically is known for negative effects of reflection,
that need to be taken into account in
Hi,
We currently have five 18ghz links... two have been up for almost 4
years with less than 30 minutes downtime total.
1 - 7 miles, 2ft dishes, 99.% calc'd uptime, so far correct (4
years)
2 - 19 miles, 4ft dishes, 99.999% calc'd uptime, so far correct (4
years)
3 - 14 miles, 2.5ft
I agree, they seem to be very solid. We have 4 links (I think) with 3 on
DragonWave and they are rock solid. Maybe we have 4 on DragonWave. One on
Trango is still a pretty new install and may have configuration issues, so my
comments about that system should be taken with a grain of salt.
17 matches
Mail list logo
