Hi,
I need to broadcast two live video streams , each one with about
6mbits (12mbits total upload bandwitdh ). A truck with a camera and the
wireless device need to upload the live streaminig for about 5 miles
circuit. That circuit is all covered with fiber optic so repeaters can be
used. I
Same here with a baby monitor we have. I love it.
Brian
Brian Webster wrote:
My GE DECT 6.0 phones have range far better than any other cordless phone
I've owned. It's a huge difference.
Thank You,
Brian Webster
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Lets be careful out there guys. Even when you do it right things happen.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: k7...@aol.com
To: cq-cont...@contesting.com
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 12:16 PM
Subject: [TowerTalk] Field Day tower fatality
I just got this and hadn't heard about it. Sad
Wow, it bent at the base?!
On 7/8/09, Marlon K. Schafer o...@odessaoffice.com wrote:
Lets be careful out there guys. Even when you do it right things happen.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: k7...@aol.com
To: cq-cont...@contesting.com
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 12:16 PM
On 7/8/2009 5:45 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Wow, it bent at the base?!
My thoughts too. There had to be a cause; there's more to the story.
But hamfests are usually run by guys that generally know what they're
doing so that does lead one to ponder.
Geez, and I climb some pretty old towers
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=3905745CatId=1626SRCCODE=WEBBP1218cm_mmc=Email-_-Retro-_-WEBBP1218-_-storage
Gary Garrett wrote:
Nice! where can I get a 1 Watt Amp for 1900mhz?
The only way I've gotten decent range out of a DECT phone is by
San news.
Richard
2009/7/8 Rick Kunze rku...@colusanet.com
On 7/8/2009 5:45 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Wow, it bent at the base?!
My thoughts too. There had to be a cause; there's more to the story.
But hamfests are usually run by guys that generally know what they're
doing so that does
It appears they use a couple different towers. The matter has my interest as
well.
I wouldn't expect a tower to bend at the base. Perhaps it was the crankup
portable tower,
as the news article discussed different accounts of 30' and 60' towers, and
that could
possibly do both heights. Those
I haven't worked with it yet but cisco's IP SLA feature can generate a MOS score
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/technologies/tk648/tk362/tk920/technologies_white_paper0900aecd801752ec.html
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of
Good call... I forgot all about IP SLA. We can easily query that via
SNMP.
-Matt
On Jul 8, 2009, at 11:35 AM, Rutis, Cameron wrote:
I haven't worked with it yet but cisco's IP SLA feature can generate
a MOS score
This guy sounded like a pro so he likely was climbing safely. What can
cause a Field Day tower to bend at the base?
1. Overloading a tower with too many large HF antennas is certainly a
possibility during Field Day.
2. The tower may have been old and rusted inside although perhaps the
rust
Our Local Verizon DSL is having all kinds of problems today not being able to
see all websites or email servers. Anyone else seeing this issue?
Not going to Network Solutions hosting or iXWEBHOSTING.
Steve Barnes
RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service
-Original Message-
From:
North Korea hackers...
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Steve Barnesst...@pcswin.com wrote:
Our Local Verizon DSL is having all kinds of problems today not being able to
see all websites or email servers. Anyone else seeing this issue?
Not going to Network Solutions hosting or iXWEBHOSTING.
That's really unfortunate, but part of the issue. Field Day and other
Ham Fest activities are kinda like an annual racing regatta. I've always
been a cruiser, but racers get out the slide rules and factor the
smallest guage for their shrouds, stays, and other standing rigging just
to cut back
I'm in the market for a new set of backhauls and my sales rep is
trying to talk to into a set of LingoWave LW-PTP-5-23 units. Does
anybody have an opinion on this LingoWave product?
I operate in a fairly noisy environment and have the need to pass
about 20-30 mbps.
--
~Ron Calhoun
KCnet
I've heard great things about Ligowave's products, especially when you don't
need 100s of megs it is a good option.
No personal experience with them though.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible,
I really like mineBut, being in a noisy area, you may want to
consider something that is approved for 5.3/5.4 like Trango or Tranzeo.
Of course distance will be a factor with those.
Josh Luthman wrote:
I've heard great things about Ligowave's products, especially when you don't
need
I'd highly recommend the Trango TLink-45s.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Randy Cosbydco...@infowest.com wrote:
I really like mineBut, being in a noisy area, you may want to
consider something that is approved for 5.3/5.4 like Trango or Tranzeo.
Of course distance will be a factor with
Perhaps you could share the distance between the two sites and you can get
better information (ie, my works super 50 megs at 1 mile but terrible 100k
at 3 miles) and possibly receive alternative options.
For 5ghz you may want to look at MikroTik, too. I have two dual polarity
5ghz links that
Thanks Steve! Great job on the seminar. That was very helpful.
I wish it made the decision to go or no go easier. This looks like a good
thing but one with a lot of risk.
marlon
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
I'm shooting from my office to my tower site which is about 4 miles
away. I am currently using WaveRider 900MHz gear and Tranzeo 5GHz gear
along with a canopy 5.2GHz link.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
Perhaps you could share the distance between
If I were in your shoes a 4 mile link with 5.8Ghz that needs 20 to 30 megs I
would build a MikroTik kit myself. Cost is really tough to beat (figure $1k
per side on the high end)
I'd suggest the 433AH and XR5 or WLM54AG with the dual pol Pac dishes. If
you want my full parts list let me know.
This LingoWave equipment is promising true TCP throughput up to 70
Mbps with a 40MHz wide channel at 5 miles for a little less than $1k.
40Mbps with a 20MHz wide channel (what i use with my tranzeo gear).
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
If I were
FWIW someone in the School needs 100mbps thread mentioned they use 433 and
R52 to get 80-90 megs using 40mhz channels
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable,
Prices are per end. I have not used Ligo personally. A friend of mine has 10
sets in the air and swears by them.
You might want to use connectorized radios and panel antennas, particularly if
you plan to standardize. If you have connectorized radios, then you only need
one spare on the shelf.
That would be using two R52 cards on each side (so 80mhz of channel
total). Using MT, the most I have seen using 40mhz channel size is
60Mbps.
Travis
Microserv
Josh Luthman wrote:
FWIW someone in the "School needs 100mbps" thread mentioned they use 433 and
R52 to get 80-90 megs using
Travis is right, 80mhz of spectrum (ya...)
Are you saying you saw 60 megs on ONE 40mhz link?!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth.
---
Yes. I have personally done 60Mbps of actual traffic across a MT using
40mhz of spectrum (only going 1 mile with a -60 signal and using P4
systems on each end). I was also testing "through" the radio link, not
using the actual radios themselves to test.
Travis
Microserv
Josh Luthman wrote:
Cool! Thank you for the input!
On 7/8/09, Travis Johnson t...@ida.net wrote:
Yes. I have personally done 60Mbps of actual traffic across a MT using 40mhz
of spectrum (only going 1 mile with a -60 signal and using P4 systems on
each end). I was also testing through the radio link, not using
2 rb411 will yield same results
Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
(321) 205-1100 x102
On Jul 8, 2009, at 6:52 PM, Travis Johnson t...@ida.net wrote:
Yes. I have personally done 60Mbps of actual traffic across a MT
using 40mhz of spectrum (only going 1 mile with a -60 signal and
using P4
411/433 or 411ah/433ah?
60 megs sounds like a bit much for the non-AH boards, but I never tested.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth.
The regular 411 will work fine, the limitation is not the processor. But
having said that, a little extra horsepower on a higher capacity link never
hurt either ;)
Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102
Original Message
From: Josh Luthman
I agree. I'd spend another $100 and get all that extra memory and CPU speed
in case I need to do whatever. Once it's up there, it's pretty much up
there. Rather spend and waste that $100 not needing it then need it having
to spend a lot of time, money and risk another climb!
PSA: BE SAFE!
anybody got any real world experience of the performance difference
between the RB 333 vs the RB 433?
The 333 has a 333MHz PowerPC and the 433 has a Atheros AR7130
300MHz...But which is faster in the real world?
How about the RB 532A with the MIPS 32 4kc at 266MHz?
Hard to compare different
Hello,
Looking for a panel antenna that will operate from 2.3GHz - 2.5GHz for a
licensed link (not in the US).
Something with a fairly narrow beamwidth, say around 22-degrees, and at
least 16dBi of gain.
The PacWireless RooTenna does 2.3-2.7, but we have no use/desire for the
enclosure, so it's
333 is junk all around, quick or not. How many 3xx boards do you see?
532 is extremely fast but has a long history of losing the ethernet
half of eth1. There are many people including myself that had to
climb up many towers to put two pairs on eth2 because this.
433 is good. Nothing stands
What are people using for 3.65ghz antennas?
I'm seeing rather poor performance from my Arc Wireless 18db panels.The
signal vs distance isn't coming out anywhere close to right. That is the
specified antenna type and gain for the certification, but the RSSI is far
weaker than it should
Hi,
I have about 10 of the ARC wireless 3.65ghz 18db panels installed. All
of them are within the path calcs (and the last point to point link was
actually 6db better than the path calc).
What are the specs of the radio card, distance, etc.?
Travis
Microserv
rea...@muddyfrogwater.us wrote:
The 333 boards are crap. We installed about 15 of them before we
realized all the problems (overheating, flaky ethernet, etc.).
We have over 1,000 of the RB411's installed and they work great.
Travis
Microserv
Blair Davis wrote:
anybody
got any real world experience of the performance
How far off is it? Maybe the pigtails are all shotty?
On 7/8/09, Travis Johnson t...@ida.net wrote:
Hi,
I have about 10 of the ARC wireless 3.65ghz 18db panels installed. All
of them are within the path calcs (and the last point to point link was
actually 6db better than the path calc).
411 and 433 are the same short of two extra ethernet ports and mini
pci afaik. I'm with Travis though, many 411 CPEs.
On 7/8/09, Travis Johnson t...@ida.net wrote:
The 333 boards are crap. We installed about 15 of them before we realized
all the problems (overheating, flaky ethernet, etc.).
No hard data, but I have replaced 532 and 532A with 333 and seen better
link performance. I have replaced 333 with 433 and seen no real
difference. Replacing 333 with 433AH probably does, but I really don't
have any evidence.
Blair Davis wrote:
anybody got any real world experience of the
I'm using the ubnt cards and the arc wireless panels that mount directly to
the genII enclosure.
I don't recall the precise amount off, but if memory serves it is about 5 or
6 db, and I've been to both ends and aimed, reaimed, etc. All the stuff,
including piggy's are new...
By new pigtails they weren't from the same shipment and same distribution,
were they? If any are bad I would expect a line of them to be (from one
machine making them kind of thing).
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have
We have the 333 deployed in a bunch of situations, they work pretty
well for us, but, for the price go for the 433. 532's were ok,
they're old style now and don't have the near the performance of the
3xx or 4xx boards.
-Kevin
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Scott
What size of channel are you using? What is the distance of the link?
What signal are you seeing?
Travis
Microserv
rea...@muddyfrogwater.us wrote:
I'm using the ubnt cards and the arc wireless panels that mount directly to
the genII enclosure.
I don't recall the precise amount off, but
Well the boot times of the 532 are superior to any other routerboard I've
used. Don't know how that reflects on it's performance in PPS as it could
simply be a faster storage device.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have
If I call, the RB600 boots in about 6 seconds from the time the power
is applied to the time you get the beeps. We had a link that one of the
boards was bad, and was rebooting 4 or 5 times a day, but we never
noticed it because it would reboot so fast...
Travis
Microserv
Josh Luthman wrote:
Never had a rb600 or rb1000 but IIRC the 532 was about that quick too...
I have a 532 with a busted radio in it on my desk. I'll time it tomorrow!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which
But does boot time correlate with PPS?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth.
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:11 PM,
Here's one with the 532 incuded.
http://www.routerboard.com/pdf/tests_jan_2008mbps.pdf
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
But does boot time correlate with PPS?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
http://www.mikrotik.com/pdf/RouterBOARD_Price_Performance_Comparison.pdf
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
Well the boot times of the 532 are superior to any other routerboard I've
used. Don't know how that reflects on it's performance in PPS as it
Thanks for all the comments...
I have RB 112,133,230,333,411,433,532 in service.
I've lost two 532's to on board power supply failure, one 532 to a
direct lighting strike.
I've lost one 112 to Ethernet port failure, and a 133 to unknown causes
My 333's, 411's and 433's have been flawless.
Kevin's link
http://www.routerboard.com/pdf/tests_jan_2008mbps.pdf
says the 333 dominates over the 532 (per MikroTik's testing)
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
http://www.routerboard.com/pdf/tests_jan_2008pps.pdf
Well, pps wise, it looks like the 433 is around 80kpps and the 433 ah
is around 140kpps. Best performance pps that the 333 can do is
80kpps.
-Kevin
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:37 PM, Josh
Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
Kevin's
55 matches
Mail list logo
