I ran untangle on my test box for a few months. It was great except it
kept locking up.Maybe they fixed that? Either way, Mikrotik kicks
butt!
-RickG
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Scott Reed wrote:
> I haven't used untangle.
> I think one way to do this is to redirect to the proper server based
I knew I could count on Tom to reply with some good advise!
I totally agree and fully intend on pushing in that direction. I'm
just looking for alternative ideas in case I cant get the mayor to see
things my way.
Thanks! -RickG
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
> All I can say i
But easily defeated. New proxies are popping up all the time. Kids can
even set up their own at home for their own use.
On Aug 14, 2009, at 1:59 PM, ccrum wrote:
> OpenDNS is approved for this...best thing is it is free.
>
> Cameron
>
> Scott Carullo wrote:
>> I need a web content filter for K-
I would think OpenDNS could serve different info based on source address. I
never used OpenDNS but understand it's pretty powerful and flexible. With
BIND which I used for many many years you can setup different service rules
based on source address. This way you can for example prevent pollution o
I haven't used untangle.
I think one way to do this is to redirect to the proper server based on
customer IP, etc.
Thinking Mikrotik, because that is what I use, redirecting all of a
customer's DNS request to the proper internal server would be an easy
firewall rule. The internal server, which
...but, so many links are IP addresses instead of host name/header, I'm
curious how a DNS involvement would do anything.
. . . j o n a t h a n
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 2:
Kinda what I was thinking was that if they wanted to utilize the filtering
then we would assign them DNS servers specific for OpenDNS, otherwise, they
would get normal service.
This could easily be done at the CPE / Authentication level with PPPoE.
Now, the issue would be like Josh mentioned, if
FYI.. Not every site will want to have the same filter settings. Since
you can define multiple networks in OpenDNS, the IP will have to
originate from that network to get a specific set of content-filtering.
If the request originates from the local DNS server, then you've just
inadvertently ap
Marlon,
Are you actively marketing it? We have been contemplating a backup service as
well.
Bob Elliott
Information Systems
RCS Communications
502.587.7384
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Thursday
On Aug 14, 2009, at 2:27 PM, ccrum wrote:
> Slander only applies if it is untrue. Stating a fact, regardless of
> how
> embarrassing it is would not be slander. When your bank places a
> foreclosure notice on your house because you haven't paid your
> mortgage
> you don't get to sue.
That is
I just thought about "how to get around this" and I wanted to share my
thoughts. If a location needs this filtering and you use opendns you'll
want to drop all forwarded DNS traffic. Force everyone to use an internal
DNS server which in turn looks up via OpenDNS.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-234
We do this all of the time, and out of the hundreds of WISPs and ISPs I have
never heard of anyone getting sued over it.
---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikr
On this same subject, anyone offering "upgrades" for filtered Internet
service to their clients? Anyone using OpenDNS to do this?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of ccrum
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 1:29 PM
To: sc...@br
OpenDNS is approved for this...best thing is it is free.
Cameron
Scott Carullo wrote:
> I need a web content filter for K-12 school. Paid Subscription ok.
>
> Please let me know what good products there are for this requirement. Need
> asap. Thanks...
>
> Scott Carullo
> Brevard Wireless
> 32
Slander only applies if it is untrue. Stating a fact, regardless of how
embarrassing it is would not be slander. When your bank places a
foreclosure notice on your house because you haven't paid your mortgage
you don't get to sue. As was stated earlier, dish network certainly
doesn't have a pro
If you can't find one and REALLY have to have one, hit me offlist.
Cameron
Jayson Baker wrote:
> I know PacWireless has a 2.3GHz sector for Vpol, but we have an application
> where Hpol is required.
> Anyone aware of such a thing?
>
> Jayson
>
>
> -
All I can say is, Bandwidth is cheap, labor and time aren't.
The problem is cheap equipment is expensive to maintain, and expensive
equipment is cheap to maintain.
Again, if not in control of the installation, design, and equipment
selection, is it worth teh liabilty to flat rate a cost, to guara
Your post reminded me of a current situation I have. Basically, I was
slated to get the rights to a couple of water tanks in a nearby town.
Recently, the major told me that he was going to provide FREE
wireless access to his city (pop 1502). I told him it wont work unless
he hit the lotto since th
Yes, those Livingston Portmasters? Expensive, but great boxes. -RickG
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:16 AM, jp wrote:
> Back in the day, we used to pay $1-12000 for VCR sized rackmount boxes to
> handle
> dialup users at $20/month. At $5/month, the economics are great for backup
> infrastructure,
Back in the day, we used to pay $1-12000 for VCR sized rackmount boxes to
handle
dialup users at $20/month. At $5/month, the economics are great for backup
infrastructure, assuming a $1000 box of computer parts and hard drives can
handle the
same quantity of customers.
It's the tech suppo
If you go to dansguardian.org, they have links to their commercial
version. These folks are also the folks that produce the smoothwall
firewall system and they have a setup called schoolguard as well as
preconfigured appliances.
--Curtis
Israel Lopez-LISTS wrote:
> I have to agree. It seem
21 matches
Mail list logo
