Using only 20 mhz, notice the airspeed is 130/117 which is pretty close
to full modulation.
Regards
Michael Baird
I've got a 10 mile link with two Ubiquiti 2ft dishes -60 or so on both
sides, I can get 77 megs one way and 58 the other, one side has some
noise issues hurting throughput. This
I don't know why the term ISM Band even got created. I think it is just
from the blurring of terms.
ISM is a licensed service (Part 18) and it is authorized in many frequency
ranges from DC to Daylight.
What we do is Part 15. So are the 49 MHz baby monitors, walkie-talkies,
remote thermometers.
Now Hams are coming to us wanting Internet bandwidth for interconnecting
the
D-Star digital repeaters that Icom makes. Makes for a nice trade for tower
rent on some towers a WISP may not normally easily access.
I have had this happen to me as well, hams are letting me use tower space in
exchange
LOL This should be good.
Think 1001 ways to skin a cat..
First, you need to tell us more about what you want to do.
WHERE will the system be located? Cincinnati or elsewhere?
In town, in the burbs or 10 miles out of town?
What is the geography like there? Hills, flat, trees (how tall,
15 per ap? Man I WISH I could do that out here!
I barely break even on a site at 15 subs. (I really hate the sites with 3
to 5 subs on them :-( ).
I think my highest site is up to 76 subs or so. Got a couple of them like
that. They are certainly feeling the strain but we're out of
All of my repeater sites have 0 infrastructure cost. I'm using a TV tower,
grain leg, etc. This means the only additional cost is a NEMA box, cheap
battery, mt box and omni. Roughly $400. If I get one customer at 35/mo it
takes a year for ROI. Two customers six months, etc. I typically
That's way more than $400 for a repeater site.
I don't pay monthly rent of most of them either, but it still costs to build
one.
Good water tight box, $200+.
Coax, $1 per foot or so. $12 each for connectors (unless you buy the cheap
junky ones then it's still $4 to $6 each).
MT 433 AH
Marlon:
I am very interested in your no more taping bulkhead connector. Do you
mean on the NEMA box? What do you use?
Friendly Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Tuesday, April
For small repeater sites (less than 40 subs) we'll do the following:
These our QLW prices without special discounts:
RB/433 : $76
XR2: $99
XR5: $99
DCE: $45
Pigtail: $11.50 x2
NM-NM Jumper: $18.50 x 2
2.4Ghz x12dB Omni: $70
RJ45-ECS: $6.60
ARC 5823 Panel: 43
~$500 + s/h
100' Cat5 run at $.17/ft
Good water tight box, $200+.
The ones from Tessco are 60-100
Coax, $1 per foot or so. $12 each for connectors (unless you buy the cheap
junky ones then it's still $4 to $6 each).
I buy premade LMR400 and a N female bulkhead, I'd say $15 or 20 total
MT 433 AH board, $100ish
I only use one
Calling 626-243-2110 makes it sound like they're under water (literally).
Maybe some network issues?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
that counts.”
--- Winston
They just called me and made me aware that they just received their FCC
cert in 5.3 and 5.4 bands.
They have a 3x3 MIMO PTP product. I'll probably get a test pair to play
with.
The bigger news, does this mean the FCC is going to start craking out
the certs again yippy!
--
Thanks,
On 2x2 MIMO they use V and H polarization. How do they do 3x3? What's the third
polarization?
Greg
On Apr 27, 2010, at 4:08 PM, Cameron Kilton wrote:
They just called me and made me aware that they just received their FCC
cert in 5.3 and 5.4 bands.
They have a 3x3 MIMO PTP product. I'll
For what it is worth... running a successful WISP will require a certain
level of technical expertise and probably a coder.
Anyone can throw up a simple access point with a tall antenna and connect it
to a LAN, but to grow and reach any sizeable market, you are going to need
someone that knows
Anyone needing bandwidth within our service range contact me off-list.
We recently turned up a couple of Gig in fiber and have some good
pricing available.
Here's our service area:
http://www.argontech.net/Map/wirelessmap.html
Marco
--
Marco C. Coelho
Argon Technologies Inc.
POB 875
It's a backup.
On 4/27/10, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2x2 MIMO they use V and H polarization. How do they do 3x3? What's the
third polarization?
Greg
On Apr 27, 2010, at 4:08 PM, Cameron Kilton wrote:
They just called me and made me aware that they just received their FCC
Coding != networking :)
On 4/27/10, Larry Yunker leyun...@wispadvantage.com wrote:
For what it is worth... running a successful WISP will require a certain
level of technical expertise and probably a coder.
Anyone can throw up a simple access point with a tall antenna and connect it
to a
They have 3 pol antennas available
Dual slant and vertical
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On Apr 27, 2010, at 5:35 PM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
It's a backup.
On 4/27/10, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2x2 MIMO they use V and H polarization. How do
That's what I say. I just don't want to pay someone to write code when if I
spend a little time researching I can usually find a product that already does
what I need. We already provide network monitoring and other services of this
type to clients so shouldn't be a problem on the wisp side of
Wouldn't slant effect vertical and horizontal?
On 4/27/10, Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
They have 3 pol antennas available
Dual slant and vertical
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On Apr 27, 2010, at 5:35 PM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
It's a backup.
All poles have only have a limited level of seperation. Most horizonal
and vertical dual polarised antennas only have about 30 dB of seperation
between the poles. You will notice if you use two radios of similar
frequency on different poles of these antennas it does not work well
due to the
Isn't the spatial diversity technique you mentioned what's used on consumer
grade MIMO routers (it uses one of the MIMO radios or another)? On the backhaul
type radios (with 2x2) aren't both chains running concurrently?
Greg
On Apr 27, 2010, at 7:29 PM, Patrick Cole wrote:
All poles have
Yes, WDS adds significant overhead. But.. its not a real problem because
there is a hardware solution to fix it. Thats why I've been an advocate for
faster processor CPE SBCs for like ever. And its why we dont use low cost
$50 slow processor CPEs. When using 533Mhz and 680mMhz processors it
No because...
they may not all get used for Transmit and Receive.
technically, for a well designed product using some sort of time space delay
as the mechanism for seperation, having pol diversity is not necessarilly
required, as polarity is not the technique to acheive seperation.
It also is
Spot on; in the case of the QB8100, the third pole does not add any additional
carriers or throughput directly. It does serve to improve sensitivity/receive
levels due to the spatial diversity. This will help increase throughput and
reliability in noisy or multipath prone environments as Tom
If I had to do it all over again, I would say run, run as far away as possible.
Scottie
-- Original Message --
From: Marlon K. Schafer o...@odessaoffice.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 07:46:55 -0700
LOL This
Marco, could you just mail me some?
I have a hard time finding wholesale bandwidth in my market; I wish I was
closer.
Friendly Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marco Coelho
Sent: Tuesday, April 27,
What about the XR2 and XR5? I would expect all three to be in the same boat.
I had one AP that had all of the customers reassociating every minute
or two and solved the problem by lowering the tx power by 3 or 6 dbm
so the XR5 seems to be correct in this sense.
On 4/27/10, Robert West
28 matches
Mail list logo
