Hello.
Thought I share this with the list.
I have a friend that is using MT as ap on one of his towers with his
radios in 10MHz and on another tower bullets with sector panels, similar
set up on both towers except for the radios. He was explaining that he
finds the bullets outperforms the
I found that load balancing in a NAT environment was much better handled
with PCC. Might not fit for you, Just something to look at. /2cents
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/PCC
Nick Olsen
Network Operations
(855) FLSPEED x106
From: Rubens Kuhl
At 2/14/2011 08:50 AM, OptimumWS wrote:
Hello.
Thought I share this with the list.
I have a friend that is using MT as ap on one of his towers with his
radios in 10MHz and on another tower bullets with sector panels, similar
set up on both towers except for the radios. He was explaining that he
Ask this on [c-nsp], you'll get a response there.
--
Patrick Shoemaker
Vector Data Systems LLC
shoemak...@vectordatasystems.com
office: (301) 358-1690 x36
http://www.vectordatasystems.com
On 2/12/2011 6:59 PM, Travis Johnson wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone ever used a Cisco 3GE-GBIC-SC line card in a
I agree with Fred. It's not about the number of clients that causes the
problem. The physical separation of the radios is probably the key factor in
the increased performance. Putting multiple radios with possibly leaky
pigtails inside the same enclosure can introduce opportunities for
The thin pigtail decides the number of clients ? lol, more likely the signal
loss in the pigtail causes low signal on clients causing all kinds of problems,
making it look like it is caused by a certain number.
Depending on hardware used for the Tik box, it probably out performs the Bullet.
I think we should consider supporting it only as our fallback
position. I think our primary mission should be on bringing awareness
that it makes no sense to raise government money by selling off the
one asset (spectrum) required to bring affordable and plentiful
broadband to the masses to the
On 02/14/2011 07:50 AM, Optimum Wireless Services wrote:
Hello.
Thought I share this with the list.
I have a friend that is using MT as ap on one of his towers with his
radios in 10MHz and on another tower bullets with sector panels, similar
set up on both towers except for the radios. He
StarOS 1.3.23b.v.fcc
They are Lucaya x4000s which I believe are gateworks boards with
wlm54agp23 cards
On 2/10/11 5:58 PM, RickG wrote:
Whats the StarOS running on? What type of cards?
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Sam Tetherowtethe...@shwisp.net wrote:
Can't speak to the 2.4GHz gear,
At 2/14/2011 11:30 AM, John Scrivner wrote:
I think we should consider supporting it only as our fallback
position. I think our primary mission should be on bringing awareness
that it makes no sense to raise government money by selling off the
one asset (spectrum) required to bring affordable and
So now you have lots of good explanations for what the differences are.
Another part of it is that if you do the calculations, you will find 2
things. First, the current in the cable is minuscule, so the loss
because of current is basically non-existent. Secondly, the current
does not go up
My experience is that with the crappy little grey or black pigtails your
signal sucks. The copper braided pigtails like the Laird/Pac ones seem to do
great. Not that I 'm downing Wisp-router, but they have always carried the
crappy ones. I have avoided ordering any pigtails from them for quite
Sorry for the long post but I need some suggestions here guys.
Customer has a 7.3 mile 5ghz link.
MT 433AH on one end and MT 411AH on the other.
Version 4.16 on both units.
Both units have MT R52Hn cards.
28 db grids on both ends with 6-10ft lmr400 jumper.
Signal strength is -65 to -65 on
After posting I recalculated what the signal strength should be and it
turns out to be mid 50's.
So I guess there is defiantly wrong in the rf system some where.
On 2/14/2011 12:00 PM, Data Technology wrote:
Sorry for the long post but I need some suggestions here guys.
Customer has a 7.3
If it were me, I would check that LMR and all that other garbage. Use the
ARC 23dbi panel/enclosures. You'll lose 10dbi (less because of LMR400,
connectors, pigtails, N connectors) but you'll have less to worry about when
ice gets on the antenna (IME last week - none).
Everything is enclosed
Agreed. The overall cost is not that high compared to the time lost picking at
it.
I'd rather test and troubleshoot at the bench.
- Jerry
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 10:14 AM
To: WISPA General
(Of course when I point out the same thing to netheads, that TCP/IP
is terribly obsolete, they look at me like I'm nuts, but then they're
inside the belly of their beast too.)
If you have a link to any of your past writings along that regard I
would very much like to see them.
Just give us
At 2/14/2011 01:40 PM, you wrote:
(Of course when I point out the same thing to netheads, that TCP/IP
is terribly obsolete, they look at me like I'm nuts, but then they're
inside the belly of their beast too.)
If you have a link to any of your past writings along that regard I
would very
This was not my design. I would not have used a pac grid on a link like
this. Ice on them will cause them to drop signal.
I would have used a 2 ft dish for this link but I think I will look at
the arc panels.
LaRoy
On 2/14/2011 12:20 PM, Jerry Richardson wrote:
Agreed. The overall cost is
For 7 miles? Use the 23dbi ARC things. I get them from Streakwave. Jut
ask for ARC wireless 23dbi panel/enclosures. Very lightweight solution
(compared to a two foot dish!)
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at
In case you missed the Announcement Email I sent out last night, if you
register before the Early Discount Deadline of February 15th, your name will
be placed in the pool to be drawn to win an Apple iPad. Make sure you take
advantage of a $40 savings on Early Discounts and have a chance to win
Looking at these panels, it looks like you would not easily change a
card or board on the tower.
Can these panels be swapped out without having to re-align?
LaRoy
On 2/14/2011 1:19 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
For 7 miles? Use the 23dbi ARC things. I get them from Streakwave.
Jut ask for ARC
I've never had to swap them so I can't speak from first hand experience.
Also, when I replace something - it's the whole thing. I don't not tinker
around with a tiny mini pci
card when it's raining or 0*F. Raise the whole thing up, whole thing down.
To answer your question, you need to replace
The mount attaches to the enclosure, and the antenna screws to the enclosure.
You can remove the whole thing from the mount, work on it, and put it back on
the mount without losing alignment.
- Jerry
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Data
You could remove the 4 bolts to remove the antenna/enclosure part, yes. Not
sure how in the world you'd take the 8mm nuts off on a tower and not lose
one!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Jerry
On 02/14/2011 01:19 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
For 7 miles? Use the 23dbi ARC things. I get them from Streakwave.
Jut ask for ARC wireless 23dbi panel/enclosures. Very lightweight
solution (compared to a two foot dish!)
http://tinyurl.com/4jqqq2h is a complete system (with routerboard,
That's the one, but I would DEFINITELY use an XR5 for a ptp link.
Voltage/board depends on your particular link.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Butch Evans but...@butchevans.com wrote:
On
I have tried those in the past and not had good luck with them. They
don't seem to be as sensitive as other cards.
I used to use mostly cm9's but have been using the MT R52Hn cards. You
get the power and they seem to receive better than the XR5's.
LaRoy
On 2/14/2011 2:26 PM, Josh Luthman
My experience shows the complete opposite and all other reports have agreed
with me. Not arguing, just emerging facts.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Data Technology w...@dtisp.com wrote:
I have
Anyone have a 25Mbps+ circuit with a Mikrotik on the edge that I could
run some bandwidth tests to? The most I have access to at the moment is
10meg with a Mikrotik on it.
I just installed a bonded DSL setup, and want to test the speeds
Thanks
Nick
I hear ya. I know a lot of people swear by them. I just know I have
tried them 4-5 different times and they never work as well as I think
they should. I can pull it out and use a CM9 or R52Hn and get better
receive by a couple of db or more.
On 2/14/2011 2:46 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
My
Actually, in the technical specificationsthe R52HN claims to be better
than a XR5. I have not used any R52HN for comparison.
RX Sensitivity at 54mbit is -80 with R52HN vs -74 for XR5.
Regards,
Chuck
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:
My
http://speed.inxwireless.com
If it has to be MT let me know off list.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Nick lists-wi...@atomsplash.com wrote:
Anyone have a 25Mbps+ circuit with a Mikrotik on the
I think the r52hn is ideal for a cheap CPE radio. Cheap and works well. It
does N, too, but that's besides this discussion. Just not quite up there in
terms of a ptp link.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at
Ok that doesn't mean everyone on the list has to try the speed test =P
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:
http://speed.inxwireless.com
If it has to be
There's about 400 megs free on this pipe. Can I try? :-p
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 2/14/2011 3:12 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Ok that doesn't mean everyone on the list has to try the speed test =P
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct:
Let me know, one of our speeds tests to a client last weekend was 350
meg .:)
---
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
Just to let you know, Google are giving away chrome notebooks for testing.
https://services.google.com/fb/forms/cr48advanced/
Best wishes,
Will
Sent from my HTC
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 11:59 -0600, ch...@htswireless.com wrote:
My experience is that with the crappy little grey or black pigtails your
signal sucks. The copper braided pigtails like the Laird/Pac ones seem to do
great. Not that I 'm downing Wisp-router, but they have always carried the
That's just plain ignorant! 6 radios? I think the o=most I have ever
attempted was 2 in one unit. I've heard too many horror stories...! Actually
in this town there's another wisp using a vertical omni and a horizontal
omni. Plus the town is only like 2k pop. I ran like that for the better part
I use a lot of omni's... 5-10 cust each...
The most radio's I have in one box is 3... one on 2.4GHz, one on
900MHz, one on 5.8GHz
And one other with one on 2.4GHz, one on 5.3GHz, and one on 5.8GHz
And my experience with pigtails has been the opposite...
41 matches
Mail list logo
