classes online.
Of the rural Americans on dialup, 24 percent said they would upgrade if it was
available in their area, whereas only 11 percent of suburban users in areas of
non-availability and 3 percent of urban users would upgrade.
Regards
Stephen Patrick
Dear all,
Reading this thread I thought it appropriate to comment.
My aim is to make an objective and informative post, and trust it's taken as
such.
[disclaimer - our company makes and sells both FSO and RF (radio, microwave
etc) products - we don't have an axe to grind/side to take here]
FSO
Excellent discussion going here,
I'd propose something similar to Brad, with a single antenna, but with a
combiner and dual ODUs for licensed on both paths. Those go down to separate
IDUs, with separate Ethernet ports to different upstreams or routers.
That gives you complete isolation i.e. no
No problem and great to hear from you Brad.
Just for the record, here we have the English Summer. Take that as a daily
lottery of whether it's going to be sunny, drizzle or deluge.
Most probably explains why we Brits all talk about the weather - it's just so
random.
Best regards
Stephen
- and possibly corrections too -
Regards
Stephen Patrick
==
Cablefree Solutions Ltd
www.cablefreesolutions.com
==
-Original Message-
From: Jack Unger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 April 2008 17:22
To: WISPA General
I wonder if it also works well as WiMax-blocking paint ...
==
Stephen Patrick
Cablefree Solutions Ltd
Web:www.cablefreesolutions.com
==
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Fankhauser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
for P2MP.
Fading, variable channel characteristics particularly for non-LOS and of
course noise at the RX I am sure are key reasons.
Other spectral efficiencies in newer systems are gained with MIMO in it's
various permutations.
Comments/corrections welcome -
Regards
Stephen Patrick
polarisation,
and mostly on narrower channels (3.5, 7, 10MHz, though there is a 20MHz
defined, not all chipsets can do it).
Higher order modulation, plus H and V polarisations over 30MHz is how
Orthogon achieves high P2P throughput in the spectrum.
Regards
Stephen Patrick
-Original Message-
From
that depends on your deployments - some environments cope with
non-isolated roof/tower-top devices fine - and some don't. Important to
consider that.
I hope that comment is of help -
Regards
Stephen Patrick
CableFree Solutions
-Original Message-
From: Travis Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL
I don't want this to appear an advert, because that wouldn't go down well on
WISPA.
But reading the posts, thought it might be of interest to note our co makes
complete x86 boxes with 500MHz or 1GHz CPUs that run Nstreme2 at full speed
(77Mbps Full Duplex with bandwidth test utility) with plenty
And this of course is the corp with the corporate motto:
Don't be evil.
http://investor.google.com/conduct.html
I'm sure we all hope they stand to that themselves -
Regards
Stephen
CableFree Solutions
-Original Message-
From: Travis Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 July
This FCC country-code-lock-down question is interesting.
Doing a quick google I found this:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/wireless/airo1200/accsspts/a
p120scg/bkscgaxa.htm
Don't know how up-to-date those lists are, as it was posted in 2003.
Clearly some countries (e.g. Japan)
Zack, you flatter us!
Seriously, answering a few questions that were voiced
- 30degrees is very wide for FSO - the link budgets for 350feet (~100m)
would normally entail a narrower beam.
- I don't believe Plaintree use automatic tracking, but they could speak for
themselves of course
- Automatic
information you can share
yet?
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stephen Patrick
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 10:56 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Fw: [WISP] Nifty new tool for the cable ops
Zack, you flatter us
shots.
Regards
Stephen Patrick
CableFree Solutions
www.cablefreesolutions.com
-Original Message-
From: George Rogato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 March 2007 05:47
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC requests .. Bob M. what about FSO
Hey Bob M.
Seeing your on list
.. There are also now dual-mode DECT/Skype phones, which I like the look of
...
Also, in EU DECT is very popular for cordless home phones, and they have
nice looks/features.
[helpful post, BTW, Ralph]
Best regards
Stephen Patrick
CableFree Solutions
www.cablefreesolutions.com
-Original
regards
Stephen Patrick
CableFree Solutions
www.cablefreesolutions.com
[mail sent in text format: advance apologies if it arrives in HTML, our
ISP/mail server is the culprit when this happens]
-Original Message-
From: George Rogato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 March 2007 08:06
to hearing more on this debate -
Best regards
Stephen Patrick
CableFree Solutions
-Original Message-
From: Tom DeReggi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 March 2007 15:38
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] PtP pricing
Stephen,
Excellent post.
I agree that every product has
Title: Message
Dear
Travis,
We
have "end user pricing" and "reseller/WISP" pricing and the two are different;
that keeps margin in there for resellers to sell the product on, which is why
our price list isn't on the website: just a matter of history, 60-70% of our
customers are
Title: Message
Hi
Charles,
Well I
can't comment on what software Alvarion uses - they of course
can.
Sure
we can share more information with people on our solution. It uses
apassively-cooled, 1GHz CPU in outdoorgrade housing with a powerful
architecture capable of driving 5 radio cards
Title: RE: [WISPA] frame size and fps - was OT: about 70Mbps for under $ 6K
Hi there,
Not detracting from this great debate, but I'd have to make some Mikrotik comments at this point.
We use their OS in our radios and the end product we have on the market does out-perform several well-known
Title: RE: [WISPA] frame size and fps - was OT: about 70Mbps for under $ 6K
Nice one Jeff...
Absolutely right -
and our over-priced currency deserves some stick, not us (the people)
:-)
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Broadwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 June 2006
Title: RE: [WISPA] 2.4GHz Omni in 5.8GHz
Mars -
Have tried them, are fine.
Regards
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hendry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 June 2006 23:02
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 2.4GHz Omni in 5.8GHz
Because I can't find any. Got a
Title: RE: [WISPA] Wimax Hardware for sale?
Absolutely right regarding non-WiMax solution -
Well worth a look at systems built using Mikrotik O/S, which supports 5, 10, 20 and 40MHz channels, and the latest atheros cards.
Very feature-rich and good hardware support from various vendors
24 matches
Mail list logo
