Re: [WISPA] [SPAM] "FCC Confirms Delay of New Net Neutrality Rules Until 2015"

http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Tim Kerns" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 9:29:14 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] [SPAM] "FCC Confirms Delay of New Net Neutrality Rules Until 2015" Don't you think they will th

Re: [WISPA] [SPAM] "FCC Confirms Delay of New Net Neutrality Rules Until 2015"

x27;t like the net neutrality as its being >proposed, but I also don't want some services favored over others and >forced >to pay more the get them equal. > >-Original Message- >From: Matt Hoppes >Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 4:05 AM >To: WISPA General

Re: [WISPA] [SPAM] "FCC Confirms Delay of New Net Neutrality Rules Until 2015"

s and forced to pay more the get them equal. -Original Message- From: Matt Hoppes Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 4:05 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] [SPAM] "FCC Confirms Delay of New Net Neutrality Rules Until 2015" Is there any more information on what e

Re: [WISPA] [SPAM] "FCC Confirms Delay of New Net Neutrality Rules Until 2015"

On 11/12/2014 7:05 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote: > Is there any more information on what exactly the FCC is proposing to > propose? I know there was Title II thrown around There is no firm proposal. Last week Tom let out a "trial baloon" suggesting that he'd adopt something based on the Mozilla pr

Re: [WISPA] [SPAM] "FCC Confirms Delay of New Net Neutrality Rules Until 2015"

Is there any more information on what exactly the FCC is proposing to propose? I know there was Title II thrown around How would that impact us, or any other carrier? Net neutrality is about giving all packets equal access -- if I already do that, do I have anything to fear? I for one would

[WISPA] [SPAM] "FCC Confirms Delay of New Net Neutrality Rules Until 2015"

from: http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/11/11/2345213/fcc-confirms-delay-of-new-net-neutrality-rules-until-2015 "/The Federal Communications Commission will abandon itsearlier promise