Cisco 1200 series are FCC certified for DFS bands.
We have a pair of 1250's doing a .3 mile link at 135 Megabits/sec.
Throughput at about 9.5 Megabytes per second on a file copy. Yes, they
are more expensive at about $650 each (CDW), but they work. If you don't
need 802.11n, then the 1242's wil
To:
WISPA General List
Subject:
Re: [WISPA] 5.2 or 5.4
Short Hops
The 5.2 certs do you no good
open to speculation. Some think <12 weeks (I'm not one of them)
- Jerry
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Matt
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 10:50 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.2 or 5.4 Short Hops
> If you want DFS
> If you want DFS2 legal the only thing I am aware of is moto
>
> Anything (old) DFS that is not already in the air is not legal to hang.
>
> There is a slough full of stuff that is pending DFS2 certification including
> ubiquity.
When will Ubiquiti be approved? Roughly?
--
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 7:41 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.2 or 5.4 Short Hops
The 5.2 certs do you no good. 5.25 - 5.35 GHz requires DFS as well for new
deployments since the change was released
:* Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:02 PM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] 5.2 or 5.4 Short Hops
The cm9 and xr5 cards are certified for use in the 5.2GHz band
(5.18-5.32GHz) and in the 5.8GHz band (5.745-5.825GHz).
I don't use anything in the 5.4GHz band because that requires D
- Jerry
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Blair
Davis
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:57 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WIS
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.2 or 5.4 Short Hops
And now I learned something... that the 5.25-5.32GHz band is now limited by DFS.
This applies to new links only?
On 1/21/2011 12:47 AM, Blair Davis wrote:
Here is the 5.2GHz grant for the CM9
https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/tcb/reports
rg
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
On Behalf Of Blair Davis
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:02 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.2 or 5.4 Short Hops
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Blair
Davis
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:02 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.2 or 5.4 Short Hops
That's what I thought
- Jerry
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Jeromie Reeves
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:40 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.2 or 5.4 Short Hops
unii low 5.15-5.25 GHz. 50mw, integrated antenna and i
eless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Blair Davis
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:02 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.2 or 5.4 Short Hops
>
>
>
> The cm9 and xr5 cards are certified for use in the 5.2GHz band
> (5
, 2011 9:02 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.2 or 5.4 Short Hops
The cm9 and xr5 cards are certified for use in the 5.2GHz band (5.18-5.32GHz)
and in the 5.8GHz band (5.745-5.825GHz).
I don't use anything in the 5.4GHz band because that requires DFS
I really don't want
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Blair
Davis
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 5:48 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.2 or 5.4
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.2 or 5.4 Short Hops
The TLink45 (P5055m) uses DFS2 and is certified for 5.2 and 5.4... but
it will only carry 3500-4000 PPS and overall is a POS.
Moto PTP series (Orthogon) has 5.4 certified options, but certainly
isn't in the price range mentioned.
RadWin 2000 will d
The TLink45 (P5055m) uses DFS2 and is certified for 5.2 and 5.4... but
it will only carry 3500-4000 PPS and overall is a POS.
Moto PTP series (Orthogon) has 5.4 certified options, but certainly
isn't in the price range mentioned.
RadWin 2000 will do 100 FDX in those bands and is FCC certified.
How much bandwidth and what is your price point? There is Exalt Comm
EX5r series which works great.
There are others but they have various DFS qualities and some false on
noise which they mistake for DFS hits.
-B-
On 1/20/2011 5:00 PM, Jerry Richardson wrote:
> If you want DFS2 legal the o
If you want DFS2 legal the only thing I am aware of is moto
Anything (old) DFS that is not already in the air is not legal to hang.
There is a slough full of stuff that is pending DFS2 certification including
ubiquity.
Mikrotik is not DFS2.
Jerry Richardson
Sent Mobile
On Jan 20, 2011, at 1:4
FCC certified?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Blair Davis
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 5:48 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.2 or 5.4
sorry for the multiple sends...
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Luke Pack wrote:
> Check out trango 5055s- they'll do 5.2, 5.4, 5.7 and are a great
> value- they've worked well for us, and 5.4 works great when under the
> 2-3 ile mark (4 or so if you use external dishes).
>
> On Thu, Jan 20, 201
Check out trango 5055s- they'll do 5.2, 5.4, 5.7 and are a great
value- they've worked well for us, and 5.4 works great when under the
2-3 ile mark (4 or so if you use external dishes).
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Matt wrote:
> Looking for some gear to do 4 short hops under a mile and not in
Check out trango 5055s- they'll do 5.2, 5.4, 5.7 and are a great value-
they've worked well for us, and 5.4 works great when under the 2-3 ile mark
(4 or so if you use external dishes).
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Matt wrote:
> Looking for some gear to do 4 short hops under a mile and not i
Use 5.2GHz, mikrotik with cm9 or xr5 cards. I do a PtP link 3200ft
on 5.3GHz. Carries 50Mbit on a 40MHz channel with ease...
On 1/20/2011 4:39 PM, Matt wrote:
Looking for some gear to do 4 short hops under a mile and not interfer
with existing 2.4 or 5.7 gear.
Looks like Trango still sells the TrangoLINK-45, which claims to support
5.2-5.8GHz with DFS.
-Kristian
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 15:39 -0600, Matt wrote:
> Looking for some gear to do 4 short hops under a mile and not interfer
> with existing 2.4 or 5.7 gear. Was thinking of the 5.2 or 5.4 band
> g
Looking for some gear to do 4 short hops under a mile and not interfer
with existing 2.4 or 5.7 gear. Was thinking of the 5.2 or 5.4 band
gear. Whats out there that wont break the bank and is FCC compliant
in that band? Leaning towards canopy but would like more bandwidth
and a lower price.
--
25 matches
Mail list logo
