WISPA General
List
Subject:
[WISPA] Can they really do this?
There's a current debate raging right now on the NANOG
list about the ins and outs
AP and possibly end up with a
$25,000.00 ticket. YMMV
---Original Message---
From: Greg Ihnen
Date: 9/22/2012 5:34:47 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Can they really do this?
There's a current debate raging right now on the NANOG list about the ins and
outs
nant on the fourth floor decides he is sick of
>>>>> competing for airwaves for his wireless system and deploys the Cisco
>>>>> or Motorola system and squashes all the other tenants APs. All the
>>>>> other tenants APs now do not work because of the system which
&g
competing for airwaves for his wireless system and deploys the Cisco
>>>> or Motorola system and squashes all the other tenants APs. All the
>>>> other tenants APs now do not work because of the system which
>>>> has been put in place by the tenant on the fo
stem which
>>> has been put in place by the tenant on the fourth floor. Would this be
>>> a violation of Part-15 if all the other tenants were to file a formal
>>> complaint with the FCC?
>>> **
>>> *---Original Message---*
>>>
>>
e by the tenant on the fourth floor. Would this be a
>> violation of Part-15 if all the other tenants were to file a formal
>> complaint with the FCC?
>> **
>> *---Original Message---*
>>
>> *From:* Greg Ihnen
>> *Date:* 9/22/2012 5:34:47 AM
>&
nts were to file a formal
> complaint with the FCC?
> **
> *---Original Message---*
>
> *From:* Greg Ihnen
> *Date:* 9/22/2012 5:34:47 AM
> *To:* WISPA General List
> *Subject:* [WISPA] Can they really do this?
>
> There's a current debate raging right no
put in place by the tenant on the fourth floor. Would this be a
> violation of Part-15 if all the other tenants were to file a formal
> complaint with the FCC?
> **
> *---Original Message---*
>
> *From:* Greg Ihnen
> *Date:* 9/22/2012 5:34:47 AM
> *To:* WISPA Gene
h floor. Would this be a
violation of Part-15 if all the other tenants were to file a formal
complaint with the FCC?
---Original Message---
From: Greg Ihnen
Date: 9/22/2012 5:34:47 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Can they really do this?
There's a current debate raging ri
0
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Chuck Hogg
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 7:45 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Can they really do this?
Cisco has this functionality. I would think if it were illegal, they would
be slapped p
r right breaking into
>> secure APs are not under the rules of Part-15.
>>
>>
>>
>> *---Original Message---*
>>
>> *From:* Jeromie Reeves
>> *Date:* 9/23/2012 5:53:20 PM
>> *To:* WISPA General List
>> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA]
e Reeves
> *Date:* 9/23/2012 5:53:20 PM
> *To:* WISPA General List
> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Can they really do this?
>
> IANAL but, I am fairly sure P15 only applies to RF, not to the OSI layers.
> If the FCC does have control of the OSI layers from a P15 device then
> people doing
are not under the rules of Part-15.
>
>
>
>
> *---Original Message---*
>
> *From:* Doug Clark
> *Date:* 9/23/2012 9:29:49 PM
> *To:* WISPA General List
> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Can they really do this?
>
>
>
>
> *---Original Message---*
>
> *From:*
APs are not under the rules of Part-15.
---Original Message---
From: Doug Clark
Date: 9/23/2012 9:29:49 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Can they really do this?
---Original Message---
From: Jeromie Reeves
Date: 9/23/2012 5:53:20 PM
To: WISPA General L
rules of Part-15.
---Original Message---
From: Jeromie Reeves
Date: 9/23/2012 5:53:20 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Can they really do this?
IANAL but, I am fairly sure P15 only applies to RF, not to the OSI layers.
If the FCC does have control of the OSI layers
hnen
> *Date:* 9/22/2012 5:34:47 AM
> *To:* WISPA General List
> *Subject:* [WISPA] Can they really do this?
>
> There's a current debate raging right now on the NANOG list about the ins
> and outs of setting up large temporary networks for things like
> conventions.
>
>
Thanks to everyone who replied to this topic!
Greg
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Chris Stradtman <
cstradt...@greenpointcommunications.com> wrote:
> This is a common "feature" available under almost all of the enterprise
> market APs / wireless switch systems.
> I would hazard a guess that t
This is a common "feature" available under almost all of the enterprise
market APs / wireless switch systems.
I would hazard a guess that there are probably several hundred thousand APs
in the world that already have this turned on and running.
Although I would also guess that in many cases the per
Ciscos wireless LAN controllers can do this. From the web page at
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6366/products_qanda_item09186a008064a991.shtml
Q. What is a Rogue AP? Can the rogue APs in my wireless network be
automatically blocked?
A. APs that are not part of your wireless deployment a
an entity could lodge a
formal complaint against the
person or entity that was operating said AP and possibly end up with a $25
000.00 ticket. YMMV
---Original Message---
From: Greg Ihnen
Date: 9/22/2012 5:34:47 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Can they really do this
There's a current debate raging right now on the NANOG list about the ins
and outs of setting up large temporary networks for things like conventions.
This one post caught my attention. Has anyone heard of a WiFi AP that will
spoof neighboring networks to intentionally interfere with them, not by
21 matches
Mail list logo
