[WISPA] Close range radio recommendation

Need something that will go a very short distance (less than 150') with power that's able to adjust down to where it doesn't burn up radios. Has to mount outside, and no, there's no way to run Ethernet or fiber in this situation. Bandwidth is not that big of a deal - 3-6meg will be more than enou

Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation

You didnt mention if clear LOS or not. If so, Nanostation2. On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jason Hensley wrote: > Need something that will go a very short distance (less than 150’) with > power that’s able to adjust down to where it doesn’t burn up radios. Has to > mount outside, and no, th

Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation

150'? Would't the Loco be better? It's a little less sensitive too on RX which might help prevent picking up interference, reflections etc. Greg On Aug 30, 2010, at 12:08 PM, RickG wrote: > You didnt mention if clear LOS or not. If so, Nanostation2. > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jason

Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation

Yes, clear LOS. Considered the Nanostations. Prefer a Mikrotik solution though. From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of RickG Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 11:38 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio

Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation

To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation Yes, clear LOS. Considered the Nanostations. Prefer a Mikrotik solution though. From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of RickG Sent: Monday, Augus

Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation

-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *RickG *Sent:* Monday, August 30, 2010 11:38 AM *To:* WISPA General List *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation You didnt mention if clear LOS or not. If so, Nanostation2. On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jason Hensley <mailto

Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation

Ya, but I like the extra bells & whistles on the NS2. On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote: > 150'? Would't the Loco be better? It's a little less sensitive too on RX > which might help prevent picking up interference, reflections etc. > > Greg > > On Aug 30, 2010, at 12:08 PM, Ric

Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation

. Thanks! From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of RickG Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 11:47 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation Ya, but I like the extra bells & whistles on the NS2. On Mon, Aug 30, 201

Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation

ireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of RickG > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 11:47 AM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation > > > > Ya, but I like the extra bells & whistles on the NS2. > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:43 P

Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation

I just learned that with new firmware, UBNT just added support for multiple IP addresses on an interface. We were wanting that alot... - Original Message - From: RickG To: WISPA General List Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 9:47 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio

Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation

The Nanos have a hard time adjusting power down that far, though. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com On 8/30/2010 11:38 AM, RickG wrote: You didnt mention if clear LOS or not. If so, Nanostation2. On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jason Hensley

Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation

: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation The Nanos have a hard time adjusting power down that far, though. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com On 8/30/2010 11:38 AM, RickG wrote: You didnt mention if clear LOS or not. If so, Nanostation2. On

Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation

Chuck Profito Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 12:24 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation Then you have to have two, client and ap . if you are only going thru say one wall, how about a single ruckus, the packman one. From: wireless-bo

Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation

ubject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation Wall shot is not workable either. These are old buildings that 2.4 does not penetrate at all (and 900 is out of the question) - we've already tried because the cable runs are just a real big pain!! From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailt

Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation

2 Picos then From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jason Hensley Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 10:30 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation Wall shot is not workable either. These are old buil

Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation

rg [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] > *On Behalf Of *Chuck Profito > *Sent:* Monday, August 30, 2010 12:24 PM > *To:* 'WISPA General List' > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation > > Then you have to have two, client and ap . if you are only going

Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation

neral List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation Wall shot is not workable either. These are old buildings that 2.4 does not penetrate at all (and 900 is out of the question) - we've already tried because the cable runs are just a real big pain!! From: wirele

Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation

Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 10:30 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation Wall shot is not workable either. These are old buildings that 2.4 does not penetrate at all (and 900 is out of the question) - we've already tried beca