Well, I havent analysed it yet but with all the facebook uploads, online
backups, and email attachedments going on I wonder if that is the case?
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:31 AM, David E. Smith d...@mvn.net wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 23:23, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:30, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I havent analysed it yet but with all the facebook uploads, online
backups, and email attachedments going on I wonder if that is the case?
First, by very large files I'm thinking tens of terabytes. Second, there's
only a
Thats what I wanted to know. You're right - no benefit for my end users.
Thanks!
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:40 PM, David E. Smith d...@mvn.net wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:30, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I havent analysed it yet but with all the facebook uploads, online
Based on my understanding, it won't make a difference unless both ends
of the connection and every router in between has its MTU set 1500.
You can have the MTU set to 9000 on every router on your network, but if
your customer's router/PC is 1500, all frames will be 1500. People on
NANOG were
Is there any reason to enable Jumbo Frames? My RB1000 and Dell switches have
the capabilities. Time Warner says they can enable it on my fiber switch if
I want.
--
-RickG
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
Greater throughput.
On Dec 15, 2010 12:24 AM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any reason to enable Jumbo Frames? My RB1000 and Dell switches
have
the capabilities. Time Warner says they can enable it on my fiber switch
if
I want.
--
-RickG
