On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 04:04:38PM -0400, Fred Goldstein wrote:
> At 9/23/2010 03:43 PM, you wrote:
>> Hmm... looks like we need to keep up the good fight:
>
> I know this is out of line with the WISPA consensus, but it seems to me
> that if there are more than 10 white space channels in a given a
: [WISPA] Just Released: UNLICENSED OPERATION IN THE TV
BROADCAST BANDS/ADDITIONAL SPECTRUM FOR UNLICENSED DEVICES BELOW 900 MHZ
AND IN THE 3 GHZ BAND
I've wondered that as well, but the proceeding has been ongoing for
the better part of a decade, so it's quite possible that the 3 GHz
I've wondered that as well, but the proceeding has been ongoing for
the better part of a decade, so it's quite possible that the 3 GHz
section is the 2650 band that has already been open for years.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 9/23/2010 5:15 PM
Sorry guys,
Where does the FCC document speak of additional spectrum in the 3GHz band ???
F.
On 2010-09-23, at 3:43 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
> Hmm... looks like we need to keep up the good fight:
>
>
> Finally, it is important that we address additional proposals to set aside TV
> channel
I believe the FCC has another proceeding for freeing up 750 MHz of
white space in other bands for backhaul purposes. I believe 6 and 13 GHz.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 9/23/2010 3:04 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
At 9/23/2010 03:43 PM, you wrote
stein
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 4:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Just Released: UNLICENSED OPERATION IN THE TV BROADCAST
BANDS/ADDITIONAL SPECTRUM FOR UNLICENSED DEVICES BELOW 900 MHZ AND IN THE 3
GHZ BAND
At 9/23/2010 03:43 PM, you wrote:
Hmm... looks like we need
] On
Behalf Of Charles N Wyble
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 3:44 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Just Released: UNLICENSED OPERATION IN THE TV BROADCAST
BANDS/ADDITIONAL SPECTRUM FOR UNLICENSED DEVICES BELOW 900 MHZ AND IN THE 3
GHZ BAND
Hmm... looks like we need to keep up
At 9/23/2010 03:43 PM, you wrote:
Hmm... looks like we need to keep up the good fight:
I know this is out of line with the WISPA consensus, but it seems to
me that if there are more than 10 white space channels in a given
area, then letting Part 101 point-to-point operations share them
could
Hmm... looks like we need to keep up the good fight:
Finally, it is important that we address additional proposals to set aside TV
channels in rural areas
for fixed licensed backhaul in the very near future. The ability of both new
and incumbent wireless
providers to provide 4G wireless servi
2nd Memorandum and Order
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/index.do?document=301652
Rick Harnish
Executive Director
WISPA
260-307-4000 cell
866-317-2851 WISPA Office
Skype: rick.harnish.
rharn...@wispa.org
-
10 matches
Mail list logo
