Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik OSPF Problem

2010-08-16 Thread Matt Larsen - Lists
Butch - your post was fine except for the first sentence. No need to pick at wounds at this point. Let it go. Matt Larsen vistabeam.com On 8/15/2010 5:49 PM, Butch Evans wrote: > On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 17:15 -0400, Scott Reed wrote: >> I have an RB433AH running ROS3.30. It has been runnin

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik OSPF Problem

2010-08-16 Thread Butch Evans
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 20:11 -0400, Scott Reed wrote: > That all makes sense, but I think I have eliminated most of it. While it may seem that nothing has changed, it is certain that SOMETHING has changed. Some things to try: * Run a packet capture on both ends of the link looking for protocol 89

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik OSPF Problem

2010-08-16 Thread Dennis Burgess
rosbook.com/> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Scott Reed Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2010 10:25 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik OSPF Problem I will power cycle the switch tomorrow. It is an industrial DIN-rail moun

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik OSPF Problem

2010-08-15 Thread Scott Reed
I will power cycle the switch tomorrow. It is an industrial DIN-rail mount that is not managed. Scott Lambert wrote: On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 08:11:39PM -0400, Scott Reed wrote: That all makes sense, but I think I have eliminated most of it. The link from device A to device B is the primar

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik OSPF Problem

2010-08-15 Thread Scott Lambert
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 08:11:39PM -0400, Scott Reed wrote: > That all makes sense, but I think I have eliminated most of it. The > link from device A to device B is the primary link for this part of > the network to the Internet. It is carrying 2-way traffic just fine. > That would seem to indic

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik OSPF Problem

2010-08-15 Thread Scott Reed
That all makes sense, but I think I have eliminated most of it. The link from device A to device B is the primary link for this part of the network to the Internet. It is carrying 2-way traffic just fine. That would seem to indicate that all the hardware level stuff is OK. I have looked at

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik OSPF Problem

2010-08-15 Thread Butch Evans
On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 17:15 -0400, Scott Reed wrote: > I have an RB433AH running ROS3.30. It has been running well for months > or longer. Yesterday afternoon it lost the OSPF routes that come in > from the backhaul interface. I rebooted. Still no go. It showed 9 > potential neighbors in Init

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik OSPF Problem

2010-08-14 Thread Scott Lambert
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 05:15:05PM -0400, Scott Reed wrote: > I have an RB433AH running ROS3.30. It has been running well for > months or longer. Yesterday afternoon it lost the OSPF routes that > come in from the backhaul interface. I rebooted. Still no go. It > showed 9 potential neighbors i

[WISPA] Mikrotik OSPF Problem

2010-08-14 Thread Scott Reed
I have an RB433AH running ROS3.30. It has been running well for months or longer. Yesterday afternoon it lost the OSPF routes that come in from the backhaul interface. I rebooted. Still no go. It showed 9 potential neighbors in Init state on that interface. It gets neighbors on the wireless A