There are some apples / oranges differences between Tranzeo and
Nanostation that Tranzeo really ought to trumpet more. Things like
firmware rollbacks, built-in RAID file systems, etc. And they have had
a lot more time to work out a lot of bugs and irritations. All of mine
just work. Oh,
So, seeing the activity on this latest thread regarding Nanostations has peaked
my interest...so, to satisfy my own curiosity, I decided to do some research
on Nanostations
(I'm making a lot of assumptions here, so please correct me if I'm wrong, as
I'm a relative newbie to this segment of
You've summed it up pretty good. I have a few in the field and so far
they are holding up well. I've been buying the NS5s when I need new CPE
equipment (and I can find someone who has them in stock).
For residential deployments they are currently my CPE of choice.
Sam Tetherow
I agree. But the rest of us that are using a protocol like Nstreme on
Mikrotik, would like another solution. We currently pay about $180 for a
nice, professional looking Mikrotik CPE (including antenna, card,
pigtail, PoE, etc). If we could get a NS for $80 and put a MT license on
it for $40,
Charles,
I use tranzeo for my 802.11b/g clients since about 2 years ago or so. I
am now deploying the NS 2 as I can.get units and where approiate. I
will still use the tranzeo cpq-15, (think it replaced by the sl2 now),
and the cpq-19 as needed.
Charles Wu wrote:
So, seeing the activity on
Charles Wu wrote:
Now, it seems to me that the Nanostation, although cheaper in price, due to
being limited to running CSMA/CA, does not do a good job in competing with
the Motorola Canopy / Trango / Alvarions of the world...people who buy those
products are paying for the extra RD effort
] On Behalf Of Blair Davis
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 9:32 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nanostations - question
Charles,
I use tranzeo for my 802.11b/g clients since about 2 years ago or so. I
am now deploying the NS 2 as I can.get units and where approiate. I
will still use
Here are a few reasons to buy the Tranzeo
1) 3 year warranty
2) Available stock - tried to buy a lot of Nanostations lately?Good
luck getting them consistently.
3) Tranzeo design has been through a few winters and hot summers.
There are already some questions about the durability of
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Blair Davis
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 9:32 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nanostations - question
Charles,
I use tranzeo for my 802.11b/g clients since about 2 years ago or so. I
am now deploying
Charles, we are a Canopy shop. I think most are looking at the ability to
compete more profitably with DSL/cable...at least that is what I am after. Not
counting the build out of lines/cable to the customer, the DSL/Cable Co's are
out around $50 or less for the CPE end. I have not looked in a
10 matches
Mail list logo
