: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality statement from Genakowski
At 9/2/2010 05:59 PM, you wrote:
How, uhh.. .do they propose to ban doing this?
By permitting specialized services (anything other than a bog-neutral wide
open Internet service) only under limited conditions. Among them
.
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
From: mailto:fgoldst...@ionary.comFred Goldstein
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 7:43 PM
To: mailto:wireless@wispa.orgWISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality statement from
Yesterday, the Chairman released a statement on net neutrality, which
basically said We need more public comment.
This an excerpt from his published statement:
Recent events have highlighted questions on how open Internet rules should
apply to 'specialized' services and to mobile broadband --
At 9/2/2010 03:20 PM, MDK wrote:
Yesterday, the Chairman released a statement on net neutrality, which
basically said We need more public comment.
Yes, we'll need to send in more posts to keep them from producing
rules that put WISPs and other competitive ISPs out of business. It
looks as if
02, 2010 1:21 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality statement from Genakowski
At 9/2/2010 03:20 PM, MDK wrote:
Yesterday, the Chairman released a statement on net neutrality, which
basically said We need more public comment.
Yes, we'll need to send
How, uhh.. .do they propose to ban doing this?
Note how the proposed rules essentially outlaw the competitive
provision of non-POTS telecommunications service (anything but plain
Internet access). They suggest that a large ISP is allowed to offer
some small percentage of their network
At 9/2/2010 05:59 PM, you wrote:
How, uhh.. .do they propose to ban doing this?
By permitting specialized services (anything other than a
bog-neutral wide open Internet service) only under limited
conditions. Among them are these proposals, from the new Further Inquiry:
(E) Limit
