Also note that 333s are going by the wayside too. The 400 series is
really the main workhorse right now.
* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies,
We usually use proprietary radios for customer hookups, but do ocassionally use
MTs for
that. It doesn't really matter too much for that sort of use; used 532, 333,
433, crossroads, etc...
For absolutely everywhere we'd use an RB, we are only using 433AH for new
stuff.
They are not that much
anybody got any real world experience of the performance difference
between the RB 333 vs the RB 433?
The 333 has a 333MHz PowerPC and the 433 has a Atheros AR7130
300MHz...But which is faster in the real world?
How about the RB 532A with the MIPS 32 4kc at 266MHz?
Hard to compare different
333 is junk all around, quick or not. How many 3xx boards do you see?
532 is extremely fast but has a long history of losing the ethernet
half of eth1. There are many people including myself that had to
climb up many towers to put two pairs on eth2 because this.
433 is good. Nothing stands
The 333 boards are crap. We installed about 15 of them before we
realized all the problems (overheating, flaky ethernet, etc.).
We have over 1,000 of the RB411's installed and they work great.
Travis
Microserv
Blair Davis wrote:
anybody
got any real world experience of the performance
411 and 433 are the same short of two extra ethernet ports and mini
pci afaik. I'm with Travis though, many 411 CPEs.
On 7/8/09, Travis Johnson t...@ida.net wrote:
The 333 boards are crap. We installed about 15 of them before we realized
all the problems (overheating, flaky ethernet, etc.).
No hard data, but I have replaced 532 and 532A with 333 and seen better
link performance. I have replaced 333 with 433 and seen no real
difference. Replacing 333 with 433AH probably does, but I really don't
have any evidence.
Blair Davis wrote:
anybody got any real world experience of the
We have the 333 deployed in a bunch of situations, they work pretty
well for us, but, for the price go for the 433. 532's were ok,
they're old style now and don't have the near the performance of the
3xx or 4xx boards.
-Kevin
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Scott
Well the boot times of the 532 are superior to any other routerboard I've
used. Don't know how that reflects on it's performance in PPS as it could
simply be a faster storage device.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have
If I call, the RB600 boots in about 6 seconds from the time the power
is applied to the time you get the beeps. We had a link that one of the
boards was bad, and was rebooting 4 or 5 times a day, but we never
noticed it because it would reboot so fast...
Travis
Microserv
Josh Luthman wrote:
Never had a rb600 or rb1000 but IIRC the 532 was about that quick too...
I have a 532 with a busted radio in it on my desk. I'll time it tomorrow!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which
But does boot time correlate with PPS?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth.
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:11 PM,
Here's one with the 532 incuded.
http://www.routerboard.com/pdf/tests_jan_2008mbps.pdf
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
But does boot time correlate with PPS?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
http://www.mikrotik.com/pdf/RouterBOARD_Price_Performance_Comparison.pdf
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
Well the boot times of the 532 are superior to any other routerboard I've
used. Don't know how that reflects on it's performance in PPS as it
Thanks for all the comments...
I have RB 112,133,230,333,411,433,532 in service.
I've lost two 532's to on board power supply failure, one 532 to a
direct lighting strike.
I've lost one 112 to Ethernet port failure, and a 133 to unknown causes
My 333's, 411's and 433's have been flawless.
Kevin's link
http://www.routerboard.com/pdf/tests_jan_2008mbps.pdf
says the 333 dominates over the 532 (per MikroTik's testing)
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
http://www.routerboard.com/pdf/tests_jan_2008pps.pdf
Well, pps wise, it looks like the 433 is around 80kpps and the 433 ah
is around 140kpps. Best performance pps that the 333 can do is
80kpps.
-Kevin
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:37 PM, Josh
Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
Kevin's
17 matches
Mail list logo
