We have hundreds of legacy 802.11a/g UBNT equipment deployed in Colorado and
Costa Rica.
In Colorado we offer 12Mbps/6Mbps service over 802.11g--it works great. We
use NS2 and PS2 as AP, MT behind that to do things like QoS/routing.
Latency does spike and is not consistent. We have seen no
-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 9:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubnt vs Moto vs ... your brand
Hi,
Let's keep it simple and easy. With Canopy your system can scale
infinitely (due to GPS sync) and latency is always very low
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubnt vs Moto vs ... your brand
Hi,
Let's keep it simple and easy. With Canopy your system can scale
infinitely (due to GPS sync) and latency is always very low and
consistent (less than 10ms). With UBNT, you can build a system much
cheaper, and one
: [WISPA] Ubnt vs Moto vs ... your brand
Hi,
Let's keep it simple and easy. With Canopy your system can scale
infinitely (due to GPS sync) and latency is always very low and
consistent (less than 10ms). With UBNT, you can build a system much
cheaper, and one that will probably work in a small, rural
.
-Jeff
Convergence Technologies
There is a difference
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Francois D. Menard
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 7:37 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubnt vs Moto vs ... your brand
Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 10:17 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubnt vs Moto vs ... your brand
Hi Chuck,
Do you have any field review/ deployment info comparison
In trying to make the right buying decision - some simple answers may
help.
1. What is the meantime failure rate for your ubiquity equipment
2. What is the avg amount of truck rolls per week you run to fix an
issue vs the # of customers you have?
ie- if you have say 1500 clients and do 8
It's not so much what you're discussing there as much as the capabilities of
the ptmp products.
You simply can not offer the latency guarantees using Ubiquiti/802.11 that
Canopy provides.
Now if you've got 3 people to serve I think it's financially ridiculous to
get a Canopy system involved...
Actually, both work together ... we extend our Canopy PPPoE bridged segments
with Ubnt's for el-cheapo point-to-point extensions ...
Sort of a Moto Canopy P2MP-to-UBnt(P)-to-UBnt(P)
F.
On 2010-04-13, at 8:29 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
It's not so much what you're discussing there as much as the
Hi,
Let's keep it simple and easy. With Canopy your system can scale
infinitely (due to GPS sync) and latency is always very low and
consistent (less than 10ms). With UBNT, you can build a system much
cheaper, and one that will probably work in a small, rural area.
However, it does not scale.
Awesome overview - thank you.
On Apr 13, 2010, at 9:23 PM, Travis Johnson wrote:
Hi,
Let's keep it simple and easy. With Canopy your system can scale
infinitely (due to GPS sync) and latency is always very low and
consistent (less than 10ms). With UBNT, you can build a system much
cheaper,
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 9:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubnt vs Moto vs ... your brand
Hi,
Let's keep it simple and easy. With Canopy your system can scale
infinitely (due to GPS sync) and latency is always very low
PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubnt vs Moto vs ... your brand
Hi,
Let's keep it simple and easy. With Canopy your system can scale
infinitely (due to GPS sync) and latency is always very low and
consistent (less than 10ms). With UBNT, you can build a system much
cheaper
13 matches
Mail list logo
