romote unlicensed wifi
outdoors in the 5.8 UNII band via dual-band usage may be more
troubling to wisps than bleed-over from DSRC band usage.
Rich
- Original Message - From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, Nove
entially impact the high wifi
channels. However, the intent of DSRC to promote unlicensed wifi
outdoors in the 5.8 UNII band via dual-band usage may be more
troubling to wisps than bleed-over from DSRC band usage.
Rich
- Original Message ----- From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PRO
red). Hope that makes sense.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 9:50 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110)
Why on earth do they want to overlap UNII bands for th
II band via dual-band usage may be more
troubling to wisps than bleed-over from DSRC band usage.
Rich
- Original Message - From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WTB
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110)
Actually I am able to use the entire 900 MHz band here. Selectivity of
tuners has never been an issue the FCC seems very willing to consider when
romote unlicensed wifi outdoors in the 5.8 UNII band via
dual-band usage may be more troubling to wisps than bleed-over from DSRC
band usage.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, November
ensed bands but makes
926 and above useless. See ... ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 4:31 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110)
Actually I was told that th
ist
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110)
Actually I was told that this is above the existing UNII band frequencies. I
was told this has nothing to do with existing frequencies we use for our
networks.
Scriv
Rick Smith wrote:
>potential horrendous MOBILE interference to 5805 channels..
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110)
Dawn,
Could you tell us what interest you believe there should be for WISPs
involving this proceeding? I am doubting it as much as
potential horrendous MOBILE interference to 5805 channels...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110)
Dawn,
Could you tell
Dawn,
Could you tell us what interest you believe there should be for WISPs
involving this proceeding? I am doubting it as much as I would like to
know your personal thoughts on the subject. Kris Twomey looked into this
for me some time back and told me it is of no concern for WISPs. If you
se
All,
Below is something WISPA should be paying attention to.
WTB Orders (FCC-06-110)
AMENDMENT OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES REGARDING DEDICATED SHORT-RANGE
COMMUNICATION SERVICES IN THE 5.850-5.925 GHZ BAND (5.9 GHZ BAND),
AMENDMENT OF PARTS 2 AND 90 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES TO ALLOCATE THE
5.8
12 matches
Mail list logo
