inal Message -
From: "Faisal Imtiaz"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] nanostation and canopy towers within 2 miles of each
other
> Hey Tom,
> Great post with great info. have no quams with the info you have
them, and vice versa, so reduce the number of channels pointed to them. Most
>> ISPs can spare a channel, but cant spare many. So give them a solution for
>> non-interference, that impacts them the least. They were there first, and
>> would likely protect their turf, the last thing
ill come in handy, determining what channels
> are being used by the Canopy.
> .
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL& Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Marco Coelho"
> To:; "WISPA General List"
>
PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] nanostation and canopy towers within 2 miles of
each other
Canopy C/I numbers:
~3dB @ 2 Level FSK, ~10dB @ 4 Level FSK
The 430 series didn't list its C/I.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ic
est free channel to use
> for each of your sectors. That will come in handy, determining what channels
> are being used by the Canopy.
> .
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL& Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message -
> F
From: "Marco Coelho"
To: ; "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 12:57 PM
Subject: [WISPA] nanostation and canopy towers within 2 miles of each other
> I've got a competitor getting ready to light a nanostation based tower
> within 2 miles of one of
I have been testing some UBNT 2.4 stuff and not overly impressed. We
have a LOS 5 mile shot, but some pretty good 2.4 noise on the AP side.
We can't maintain much over 5Mbps (using a 10mhz channel size). Testing
through trees was almost impossible.
Travis
Microserv
On 9/22/2010 10:57 AM, Ma
I don't have personal experience with UBNT M2 and Moto Canopy.
However I would suggest that you do a search on UBNT forms for posts by
'WHT' and also on DSLReports WISP Forums.
WHT is one of the Beta Testers for advance features and newer firmware
coming down the pikes.
His testing suggests th
Yes; he's smoking something strange or someone is feeding him a line of BS.
On 9/22/2010 9:57 AM, Marco Coelho wrote:
> I've got a competitor getting ready to light a nanostation based tower
> within 2 miles of one of my Canopy 2.4 towers. What kind of
> interference should I expect?
>
> Listen
Not radio dependant. Rf is Rf.
If he's shooting through trees it is 900 or 3.65 mimo.
On Sep 22, 2010 12:57 PM, "Marco Coelho" wrote:
I've got a competitor getting ready to light a nanostation based tower
within 2 miles of one of my Canopy 2.4 towers. What kind of
interference should I expect
I've got a competitor getting ready to light a nanostation based tower
within 2 miles of one of my Canopy 2.4 towers. What kind of
interference should I expect?
Listening to this guy, their radios are magic and can shoot through
trees and over hills. Totally overcoming line of site issues. Is h
11 matches
Mail list logo
