RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aruba and Bradford

Hey Julian, Thanks for the reply. What was the reason you kept Bradford once you decided to deploy ClearPass? Does ClearPass not work well for the wired network? -Brian -Original Message- From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aruba and Bradford

On Tue Jul 19 2016 16:09:34 CDT, Brian Helman wrote: > > If you are an Aruba AND Bradford shop, what was you reason for using Bradford > vs Clearpass? Our primary interest in NAC is onboarding and guest networks > (wired and wireless). We are currently a Bradford

Aruba and Bradford

Feel free to ping me off-list. I may sanitize/redact comments and repost them for the benefit of others though.. If you are an Aruba AND Bradford shop, what was you reason for using Bradford vs Clearpass? Our primary interest in NAC is onboarding and guest networks (wired and wireless). We

RE: Top P2P apps as classified by shapers?

Thanks, Chris- that link is perfect for what I'm trying to see. -Lee Lee Badman | Network Architect (CWDP, CWNA, CWSP, Mobility+) Information Technology Services 206 Machinery Hall 120 Smith Drive Syracuse, New York 13244 t 315.443.3003 f 315.443.4325 e

RE: point to point wireless bridge

Bruce, We have a remote proctor site adjacent to one of our campuses that has been online for 7 months using a pair of Ubiquiti Airfiber 5. The testing site is CCTV intensive and we see ~300Mbps across this link very reliability pretty much all day long. We also push standard network and VoIP

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] FreeRADIUS server scaling for 802.1x

Hi Eriks, Question: are you using radius proxies to front end controller auth requests to a Load balancer that sits in front of the Radius backend servers? Is the problem the bottleneck at the wlan controllers or the Radius servers regarding concurrent loading? Thanks for your help with this

RE: point to point wireless bridge

HI Bruce, For the last link we moved to their newer Flex 4G-UHA model. We had one (two) failures with that link, I am still awaiting root cause analysis from Bridgewave enginnering. Tip; use their optics (finstar). Chad From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point to point wireless bridge

We're a Motorola/Zebra shop and use AP7161s and AP7562s for bridges. The link below (running on AP7161s) is probably 1/4 mile apart and we get phenomenal speeds. [image: Inline image 1] -- Max McGrath Network Administrator Carthage College

RE: Top P2P apps as classified by shapers?

Lee, We use Fortinet Fortigate appliances extensively with great success at handling P2P traffic. As a whole, we generally block the entire FortiGuard P2P category (among others), and then whitelist legitimate applications higher in the policy set. Skype, Steam, and Battle.net are a few

point to point wireless bridge

We have been running a pair of Bridgewave GE60 units for several years to link to some remote buildings. We recently learned that these units are reaching/reached EOL, so it is time to begin looking at replacing this hardware. I was looking to see what others have used for this type of link.

Re: FreeRADIUS server scaling for 802.1x

Curtis K. Larsen wrote: > Nice slides. This is pretty similar to what we do. We're also using > PacketFence/FreeRADIUS. The > graphing of the authentications is key to understanding/scaling things in my > opinion. Actually, with respect to our current deployment architecture, we are standing

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] FreeRADIUS server scaling for 802.1x

Nice slides. This is pretty similar to what we do. We're also using PacketFence/FreeRADIUS. The graphing of the authentications is key to understanding/scaling things in my opinion. Thanks, Curtis On Tue, July 19, 2016 8:46 am, Eriks Rugelis wrote: > David, > For what it is worth, here

Re: FreeRADIUS server scaling for 802.1x

David, For what it is worth, here is a presentation on scaling of Wi-Fi authentication which we created for this year's CANHEIT conference. https://canheit-hpcs2016.exordo.com/files/papers/145/presentation_files/1/CANHEIT2016_AuthBigWiFi.pptx We use Packetfence, which uses FreeRADIUS under the

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] [NETMAN] Top P2P apps as classified by shapers?

?Thanks, Robert. Is similar to what we used to do with our Palo Alto boxes, but even there we could report on what was being blocked the most from their auto classification under the heading of P2P. -Lee Lee Badman | Network Architect (CWDP, CWNA, CWSP, Mobility+) Information Technology

Re: [NETMAN] Top P2P apps as classified by shapers?

We're using Exinda appliances on our campuses, and we're very happy with them. We've set up a simple rule set; 1- block all the P2P traffic 2 -ignore this white list 3 -all other traffic gets bandwidth shared evenly The devices are capable of much more detailed rule sets and features, but

Top P2P apps as classified by shapers?

Apologies for the dual-posting for those who fall into that. I'm wondering if those schools running Palo Alto boxes and the like might be willing to share what your appliances are classifying as the top 10-15 P2P apps seen these days, whether you choose to block/limit them or not? Just want to