Hmm tempted to create my own signing authority cert and create one with
expiration way into the future though I just know if I do that - next
week we'll find out that we can't use SHA-2 anymore - or any keys less than
8192 bits are too small
So until that quantum cryptography stuph gets
Oddly enough, the student was out of town for the past weekend, came back
today, and it’s working just fine.
By “OK”, that is what the freeradius logs were showing; for our two 802.1X
SSID’s, our freeradius server checks our AD for username/password, and then
returns to the WiSM-2
Yes it is, with a few extras, that will be part of MR6. It's good.
Our engineering version is solid. MR6 should be even better.
Ian Lyons
Rollins College
Get Outlook for Android
From: Entwistle, Bruce
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 13:51
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC code recommendations
By OK do you mean a Radius access-accept? That is an authorization, but
doesn't necessarily imply any additional access parameters are
appropriately set (or not sent). We've seen this cause issues with eduroam
roaming before, but this can happen both on 802.1x and open (captive portal
is often
Is the engineering code you are running, the same MR5 code that is due to be
released soon?
Bruce Entwistle
Network Manager
University of Redlands
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Ian Lyons
Sent: Tuesday,
Hi Thomas,
I'm interested to understand how you reduced the interference issues in 2.4GHz
between the Stanley 802.15.4 and 802.11 systems?
Victoria Poncini
UW-IT/ MOB
4545 15th Ave NE
Seattle, WA 98105
vponc...@uw.edu
Wk Phone: 206 685-8456
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE
We have 2 DHCP servers that load-balance. They are ISC (currently, we're
going to move to Infoblox, hopefully over the summer).
The phone (per the user): It is a Google Nexus 6P.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
Ken
Short answer is it is a bug. A "Kernel Panic". AP loses its mind.Very
prevalent on the new stuff, to a much lesser degree affects "older" stuff.
Sometimes the reset fixes it. Sometimes not. We doubled down on 1810's and
2802's. Bugs galore. Which are actively being fixed-to be
We have Stanley wireless locks in two dorms (802.15.4 not 802.11) . One
dorm things worked very well in and the other was a bit of a nightmare. We
had issues with interference especially from student wireless devices
especially Zigbee devices. The locks dropped offline and batteries died
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Oakes, Carl W wrote:
> This one hits home for me, going through this now on a certificate
> expiring and battling on what to do next.
>
> Most clients don't trust any certificate, even if the device is set to
> trust them OS wide (web browser, etc). The wireless /
Then onboarding, we just have the client trust our certificate chain, not the
server certificate directly, except by server name. This permits us to renew
our server certificate without causing client trust issues.
Bruce Osborne
Senior Network Engineer
Network Operations - Wireless
(434)
We have found no issues but are just using them on the rooms and that is where
we are targeting our wireless usage..
Bruce Osborne
Senior Network Engineer
Network Operations - Wireless
(434) 592-4229
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY
Training Champions for Christ since 1971
12 matches
Mail list logo