Thanks, I am aware it’s any radius server so it seems I identified my issue a
bit hastily./… or not at all ☺
It’s been a while since I played with an Aerohive AP but 3 years ago it was so
easy to get this up and running on a single AP with different vlans and there’s
self-registration as well. T
From the iPSK config guide at:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/8-5/b_Identity_PSK_Feature_Deployment_Guide.pdf
"IPSK can be configured on any AAA serer that supports Cisco av-pair."
-Sam
This email sent from a mobile computing device. Please excuse typos and
I just looked at the IPSK video from CIsco here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=deEv-aNXfL0
Not 100% sure ISE is required by the sound of the video.
They say a radius serve such as ISE, and of course Cisco is going to try
and sell you ISE.
They are using two Cisco-AV-Pairs which are psk-mode=a
There is a lot of resolved caveats in the 160 release for the 2800/3800 series.
We’ve only got a handful of 2800’s operational but a lot to be installed, have
hit 1 issue but haven’t identified it with a known bug yet.
Despite showing “users connected” to an AP, new users couldn’t join. I
certa
We saw a surge of these after the 2015 holiday season. Like other gaming
devices, we MAC whitelist, and recommend that the users use wired if
possible. Haven't seen much trouble out of them.
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:39 PM Peter P Morrissey wrote:
> Wondering if anyone has noticed any new trends
Wondering if anyone has noticed any new trends in popular wireless devices that
we might expect returning students to want to connect in their residences when
they return?
Not being a gamer, this one was new to me. It apparently streams games on
running on your laptop to your TV over a WiFi con
.160 fixes some real world SIP and 802.11r Fast Transition bugs, if you're
using either of those features. I was told by a coworker that the
engineering prereleases of it had helped with some real life Apple
connectivity tics, but have less detail on specifics of that.
On Mon, 31 Jul 2017,
I had seen the comments made by the group during the summer related to bugs and
the 2800 APs, so as a precautionary measure we did the upgrade.
Bruce Entwistle
Network Manager
University of Redlands
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUC
Bruce,
Was there anything that you were absolutely hitting, or are you doing the “just
in case” thing here?
Lee Badman | Network Architect
Certified Wireless Network Expert (#200)
Information Technology Services
206 Machinery Hall
120 Smith Drive
Syracuse, New York 13244
t 315.443.3003 f 315.
151 here as well- is a bit frustrating that 160 just came out as we’re in our
“freeze” period now for making changes, pre-semester. Other than the typical
laundry list of cryptic bugs corrected, does anyone know if 160 addresses any
real-world, commonly impactful 3800-related bugs?
Lee Badman |
We completed the upgrade from 8.2.151.0 to 8.2.160.0 this morning. The primary
reason for the upgrade was the identified bugs related to the 2800 APs.
Bruce Entwistle
Network Manager
University of Redlands
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LIST
I would go with 8.2.160, especially if you have the new-series x800 WAPs.
Jeff
From: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
on behalf of James Helzerman
Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
Date: Monday, July 31, 2017 at 10:57 AM
To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
Subject: [WI
Hi. For those with Cisco access points what code version are planning on
running for start of fall semester?
At this point we looking at 8.2.151 possibly 8.2.160 but havent tested yet.
Thanks
-Jimmy
--
James Helzerman
Wireless Network Engineer
University of Michigan - ITS
Phone: 734-615-9541
On newer code where the controller has the new nifty dashboard, look at the
Wireless Dashboard for the high level (AP capability including channel width),
then Client Performance to see the distribution of client connection rates.
For trends, I’ve not looked for a report. Given how often clients
Nope, that’s expected. However, some clients handle it better than others.
Modern Intel nics, the user will likely not notice. Apple Macs are notoriously
slower on rolling with it. Mac users will likely drop 2-4 pings on any DCA
event they are connected to.
I’m gearing up to test 10.3 Beta to
Jeff- what are you using to report on channel widths being used by clients,
both point-in-time and longer periods?
-Lee
Lee Badman | Network Architect
Certified Wireless Network Expert (#200)
Information Technology Services
206 Machinery Hall
120 Smith Drive
Syracuse, New York 13244
t 315.443.3
16 matches
Mail list logo
