RE: New Crazy Wireless Devices

Our students are wireless only, though. Any idea what protocols they use for discovery? It probably could be added to Aruba AirGroup. Bruce Osborne Senior Network Engineer Network Operations - Wireless (434) 592-4229 LIBERTY UNIVERSITY Training Champions for Christ since 1971 From: Hunter Full

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

I’m interested here, greatly… but: - 8.5 will have to bake thoroughly for us. Not touching it until MR3 or beyond. Zero trust or faith in early WLC code anymore- seems it’s all beta quality at best anymore. - Need to see if Cisco requires more licensing in ISE somehow to ena

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Crazy Wireless Devices

We're just starting to see some of the early groups start showing up on campus. The early trends seem to be Amazon Echo/Dots and Google Home systems, among the ever growing trend of Smart TVs. The most interesting new device to show up so far as been a Ring Doorbell system. thanks mike On 7/

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

Lee, IPSK falls into base licensing as it is just RADIUS 802.1X. However, you need base licenses for every device doing an IPSK, which may increase the number of base licenses you need. If you were doing MAB before for those devices, it should be a wash. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 1, 2017,

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

Thanks, Jake. -Original Message- From: Jake Snyder [jsnyde...@gmail.com] Received: Tuesday, 01 Aug 2017, 9:35 To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU [WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version Lee, IPSK falls into base licensing as it is just RADIUS

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

Yeah, that fabric paradigm seems … well, let’s just quote from http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/8-5/config-guide/b_cg85/few.html > VXLAN > After a TCP connection flap in the WLC, it takes about five to six minutes to > reestablish the connection. During this time, the ac

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

While WLC 8.5 did add IPSK it is probably safe to say its rather worthless for most at this time. For those who have used ISE if you watch the video on how they make IPSK work it isn’t feasible to give each of your users their own PSK key to connect to wireless. The current implementation with

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

Hello all I wonder why CISCO keeps 8.2.151 as "suggested" and not 8.2.160 ?? just a precaution ? My Cisco partner is telling me to stay in 8.2.151 even if there is 8.5.x code our there. what's your opinion ? regards, On 7/31/17 4:11 PM, Paul Thompson wrote: .160 fixes some real world

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/wireless-lan-controller-software/200046-TAC-Recommended-AireOS.html#anc8 On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 5:00 PM Marcelo Maraboli wrote: > Hello all > > I wonder why CISCO keeps 8.2.151 as "suggested" and not 8.2.160 ?? > > just a precaution ? > > My Ci

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

They just released 8.2.160.0. They have not vetted the release as being stable. They will recommend after enough downloads and not a lot of bug issues. Kevin McCormick Network Administrator University Technology -

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

As others have mentioned about Cisco code, we need a good reason to goto .160. We dont have an x800 series other than 1810w. We have been bit a few times now with code stability. Our latest debacle going from .141 to .151 using pre-download all but bricked a controller. -Jimmy On Tue, Aug 1, 2

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

I feel like we might be used as QA..anyone else? On Aug 1, 2017 6:32 PM, "Mccormick, Kevin" wrote: They just released 8.2.160.0. They have not vetted the release as being stable. They will recommend after enough downloads and not a lot of bug issues. Kevin McCormick

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

Sounds standard -- Jason Cook Technology Services The University of Adelaide, AUSTRALIA 5005 Ph: +61 8 8313 4800 From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of James Helzerman Sent: Wednesday, 2 August 2017 8:10 AM To: W

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

I agree Lee, certainly production 8.5 you wouldn’t be too keen to go with the first release. We have a dev environment and spare old hardware so I was planning to run it up in the old gear hoping to get to point of potential PRD July 18…. Which is more MR2 time though, we’ll see how quickly that

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

I participate in the betas and even run a beta controller in production. This is complex stuff, and especially in EDU, we see things that no enterprise customer will even encounter – or test bed can simulate. For the most part, I’ve had no show-stopper issues going back to the post 5.2 days. Tha