Are others who are using Aerohive 650 experiencing instability issues? We
have experienced a rather extensive problem that came with sudden onset
about 1/4/2020 .
Clients appear to be able to connect to the AP, get an IP and are able to
ping the default gateway, but not beyond. The ethernet netw
On Jan 10, 2020, at 2:32 PM, Rob Harris wrote:
>
> What flavor of AP are you running? What are you doing for POE?
All 300-series (303, 303H, 305, 325). We're all-Juniper EX on switching, so in
older buildings it's 3200/4200 (802.3af PoE) and in new construction it's 3400
(802.3at).
Jason
***
Hello Craig,
Thanks for your comments.
Our main philosophy with the ANYROAM guest system is security and simplicity
(no password-only certs, one config per device for one year).
ANYROAM-guest can also be enabled per institution (opt-in) (unlike eVA unless
you customize at the NRO level),
Most im
What flavor of AP are you running? What are you doing for POE?
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
On Behalf Of Jason Healy
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 2:24 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Who has transit
I've been an Aruba customer for a long time now and while I'm still happy, I
see what you're saying. In my opinion, a lot of issues started here;
https://community.arubanetworks.com/t5/Wireless-Access/Updates-to-Aruba-Release-Naming-Replacing-ED-and-GA/td-p/279651
When they changed how the soft
I glanced away from my email and suddenly there are 50+ messages in this
thread! Late to the party but...
We're an Aruba shop now, having just gone through a vendor cage match last year
for a full system replacement and installing over the summer. While there have
been some frustrations on th
* "The new announced "E" variant with access to the 6 GHz space and the 14
additional 80 MHz channels. All of those pre-11ax AP's are probably obsolete,
and we'll have 11ax clients that can't access those channels, making use of
them challenging despite the obvious benefit.
I don't view it
The issues we are seeing having nothing to do with a client being ax capable or
not, so we’re clear. I don’t think you are saying that, but so we are clear.
Ryan
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
On Behalf Of Kristijan Jerkan
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 12:42 PM
T
I try to remind myself that EDU’s (Higher ed in particular) are outliers. We
want to buy the cutting-edge WiFi technology, but at the same time, we have the
most diverse of environments that will absolutely cause every lurking bug or
compatibility issue to come out of the shadows.
While it woul
Question: Do those of You who experience this frustration in scale have reason
to suspect compatibility issues between .ax-Aruba-code/features to be a root
cause?
We don‘t notice significant .ax client adoption. (being an Aruba shop, but not
in scale). AFIK even a lage scale event like the 36c3
> "To me, 11ax APs shouldn't even be on the Enterprise market yet."
I 100% agree with that sentiment.
At the same time, I can imagine the response an Aruba or Cisco would get
for waiting to offer those access points. Even offering the AP alongside
official guidance to disable the feature would le
and yes we provided that information to our helpdesk.
Thanks,
Martin
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 11:22 AM Martin Reynolds
wrote:
> Hi Norman,
>
> We are using aruba 515/35 APs that use .ax technology. I also did not
> turn of the .11ax feature sets. The link below is what we used to provide
> to
Hi Norman,
We are using aruba 515/35 APs that use .ax technology. I also did not turn
of the .11ax feature sets. The link below is what we used to provide to
our students for Intel drivers and has been successful.
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/54799/network-and-i-
Hi Norman,
To me, 11ax APs shouldn't even be on the Enterprise market yet. I know that
doesn't touch your question, and we all have our own "you do what you gotta do"
realities.
Thanks for reading through that long post.
-Lee
Lee Badman | Network Architect (CWNE#200)
Information Technology S
I agree with 100% of that. But here's a question ...
>> I absolutely will not sacrifice an otherwise sound WLAN by tweaking configs
>> or code upgradin
>> for some small minority of poorly designed or suddenly misbehaving clients
>> that can be fixed from the client side
What about Intel's AX d
I know a lot of people are likely following along, so I’ll throw one more rant
nugget out there (and this is not meant to distract from Ryan’s original
question):
Over the many years I’ve been doing this, I have found that MOST problems on a
healthy, well-designed wireless network are absolutel
FWIW, some of the most bizarre issues I've ran into with Aruba APs have
been related to:
- MTUs on the path
- Reassembly of packets
- Out of order fragments
- LLDP
- tx, beacon, basic radio rates
Some things to look into if the 5GHz radio drop can be deterministically
r
Hi all,
I read this thread with some trepidation, since we're just finishing up
a rollout of 150 AP515s on 7205s. We chose this platform after a nearly
6 month PoC, because we were hitting a high-impact but low occurrence
and unreproducible bug with our Surface Book 2 fleet when connected to
our E
I would agree with this, generally Aruba TAC are OK, they do have some bad 1st
line engineers, but once you get past 1st line they are usually OK. If you can
get an escalation to the ERT guys, then they tend to be really good.
We have around 450 AP's and currently run 8.5.0.4 and have rolled out
19 matches
Mail list logo