The only mixed mode I have deployed seen is WPA/TKIP + WPA2/AES
-Original Message-
From: Walter Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 8:13 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WPA or VPN
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, David
-LAN] WPA or VPN
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, David Spindler wrote:
I would not suggest WPA/WPA2 mixed mode. We've found that older macs that
don't support WPA2 would not work with mixed mode either. Windows boxes
Maybe I am the only one, but the use of the phrase 'mixed mode' is leading
to confusion
School of Business
650.724.2447
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Robinson, Ronald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 12:00 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] WPA or VPN
We are in the process of re-evaluating the security
Graduate School of Business
650.724.2447
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Robinson, Ronald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 12:00 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] WPA or VPN
We are in the process of re-evaluating the security
will also use the same
appliance for remote access, but it will have it's own logon site.
Nicola
-Original Message-
From: David Wang @ UoG CCS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 9/25/2006 12:09 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WPA or VPN
Regarding
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 17:04 -0400 09/24/2006, Zeller, Tom S wrote:
I have seen improvement with the built-in Macinstosh client with the
ASA, having stayed connected over a wired connection for over 24 hrs.
Have you tried it when the client is behind a NAT device? When
As to VPN hardware requirements, we have Cisco's new Adapative Security
Appliance (ASA) in production using L2TP/IPSEC for both wireless and
remote users.
We have seen over 1200 users on a single server while CPU usage remains
low.
One ASA costs less than the older, now (or soon) end-of-lifed
, 2006 7:45 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WPA or VPN
We have 2 SSID's one that is open but blocks most insecure protocols i.e.
anything that would expose your university email and password. And a secure
WPA2 network that authenticates against our AD
Title: RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] WPA or VPN
Nicola:
I read the press release, and a VPN seems like the right
decision for De Paul, based on their circumstances. It still seems rather
expensive compared to leveraging the WPA/WPA2 functionality in most modern APs,
and I don't see how you address
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 12:00 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] WPA or VPN
We are in the process of re-evaluating the security on our wireless
network. Currently we support Dynamic WEP/802.1x and WPA with PEAP
authentication. What I would
, September 22, 2006 3:00 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] WPA or VPN
We are in the process of re-evaluating the security on our wireless
network. Currently we support Dynamic WEP/802.1x and WPA with PEAP
authentication. What I would like to know from this group
We have 2 SSID's one that is open but blocks most insecure protocols i.e.
anything that would expose your university email and password. And a secure
WPA2 network that authenticates against our AD (students and Staff)
Basically if you can't do WPA2 then why bother trying to make something work
, 2006 12:00 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] WPA or VPN
We are in the process of re-evaluating the security on our wireless
network. Currently we support Dynamic WEP/802.1x and WPA with PEAP
authentication. What I would like to know from this group is the pros
Title: RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] WPA or VPN
This past summer we went through this discussion also, and ultimately decided on the VPN solution, in our case an SSLVPN solution vs a traditional IPSEC solution. For us it came down to ease of use for the user (mainly students) and ease of support
14 matches
Mail list logo
