Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 memory leaks

2007-10-15 Thread Doug Payne
Roth, Joe wrote: We have two Catalyst 6500’s running native IOS. Both have 3 WiSM blades installed in each. We are currently running modular IOS ver 12.2(33)SXH. Both Sup720’s seem to be leaking memory at a constant rate, about 7 megabytes a day. The Sup’s eventually hit a point where telne

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 memory leaks

2007-10-16 Thread leo song
We have two C6506+SUP720+WiSM as our cores, IOS is Version 12.2(18)SXF5, the uptime is 63 weeks, how did you notice the memory leak? and so far do you know what process cause the mem lead? we did not monitor the MEM utilization. 1 10 WiSM WLAN Service Module WS-SVC-WISM-1-K9

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 memory leaks

2007-10-16 Thread Jonathan Yantis
Joe, I would recommend running non-modular 12.2(18)SXF9 or perhaps SXF11. SXH is brand new, as is the modular code, and there are bound to be problems. WiSMs have been well tested with SXF code, so unless you have a reason to run 12.2(33)SXH, try downgrading and your problem will likely go awa

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 memory leaks

2007-10-16 Thread Roth, Joe
: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 memory leaks We have a couple of CAT6506s with WiSMs -- one with two and one with three. I don't think I am seeing this problem. However, it may be that I am not recognizing it. How are you checking for memory leaks? We ar

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 memory leaks

2007-10-16 Thread Roth, Joe
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 memory leaks Roth, Joe wrote: > We have two Catalyst 6500's running native IOS. Both have 3 WiSM blades > installed in each. We are currently running modular IOS ver 12.2(33)SXH. > > > > Both Sup720's seem to be l

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 memory leaks

2007-10-16 Thread Roth, Joe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 8:49 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 memory leaks Joe, I would recommend running non-modular 12.2(18)SXF9 or perhaps SXF11. SXH is brand new, as is the modular code, and there are boun

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 memory leaks

2007-10-16 Thread Roth, Joe
What version of code are you currently running, and is it modular or non-modular? Thanks, --Joe -Original Message- From: Doug Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 5:57 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 me

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 memory leaks

2007-10-16 Thread Jonathan Yantis
AN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU > Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 memory leaks > > Roth, Joe wrote: > > We have two Catalyst 6500's running native IOS. Both have 3 WiSM > blades > > installed in each. We are currently running modular IOS ver > 12.2(33)SXH. >

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 memory leaks

2007-10-16 Thread Dale W. Carder
Ditto here. I would stay clear of modular IOS and run something like the latest SXF monolithic-blob image. Or phrased another way, "I encourage my competitors to run the latest modular IOS." ;-) Cheers, Dale -- Dale W. Carder - Network Engineer University of Wisconsin - Madison / WiscNet http

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 memory leaks

2007-10-19 Thread Joseph Karam
We have a WiSM blade in each of our 6509s with a SUP720 module. We are not seeing a memory leak, but a CPU spike in utilization that we cannot explain. It is causing slow telnets to the 6509, but no noticeable network slowdowns or reboots. We do a: #show processes cpu history and utilizat

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 memory leaks

2007-10-24 Thread Paynter, Jeffrey
PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Office: 585.784.2405 From: Roth, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 3:56 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 memory leaks We have two Catalyst 6500