Roth, Joe wrote:
We have two Catalyst 6500’s running native IOS. Both have 3 WiSM blades
installed in each. We are currently running modular IOS ver 12.2(33)SXH.
Both Sup720’s seem to be leaking memory at a constant rate, about 7
megabytes a day. The Sup’s eventually hit a point where telne
We have two C6506+SUP720+WiSM as our cores, IOS is Version 12.2(18)SXF5,
the uptime is 63 weeks, how did you notice the memory leak? and so far
do you know what process cause the mem lead? we did not monitor the MEM
utilization.
1 10 WiSM WLAN Service Module WS-SVC-WISM-1-K9
Joe, I would recommend running non-modular 12.2(18)SXF9 or perhaps SXF11. SXH
is brand new, as is the modular code, and there are bound to be problems.
WiSMs have been well tested with SXF code, so unless you have a reason to run
12.2(33)SXH, try downgrading and your problem will likely go awa
: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 memory leaks
We have a couple of CAT6506s with WiSMs -- one with two and one with
three. I don't think I am
seeing this problem. However, it may be that I am not recognizing it.
How are you checking for
memory leaks? We ar
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 memory leaks
Roth, Joe wrote:
> We have two Catalyst 6500's running native IOS. Both have 3 WiSM
blades
> installed in each. We are currently running modular IOS ver
12.2(33)SXH.
>
>
>
> Both Sup720's seem to be l
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 8:49 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 memory leaks
Joe, I would recommend running non-modular 12.2(18)SXF9 or perhaps
SXF11. SXH
is brand new, as is the modular code, and there are boun
What version of code are you currently running, and is it modular or
non-modular?
Thanks,
--Joe
-Original Message-
From: Doug Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 5:57 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 me
AN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 memory leaks
>
> Roth, Joe wrote:
> > We have two Catalyst 6500's running native IOS. Both have 3 WiSM
> blades
> > installed in each. We are currently running modular IOS ver
> 12.2(33)SXH.
>
Ditto here. I would stay clear of modular IOS and run something
like the latest SXF monolithic-blob image.
Or phrased another way,
"I encourage my competitors to run the latest modular IOS."
;-)
Cheers,
Dale
--
Dale W. Carder - Network Engineer
University of Wisconsin - Madison / WiscNet
http
We have a WiSM blade in each of our 6509s with a SUP720 module. We are
not seeing a memory leak, but a CPU spike in utilization that we cannot
explain. It is causing slow telnets to the 6509, but no noticeable
network slowdowns or reboots.
We do a:
#show processes cpu history
and utilizat
PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Office: 585.784.2405
From: Roth, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 3:56 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM & 6500 memory leaks
We have two Catalyst 6500
11 matches
Mail list logo