Chad Frisby wrote:
Quite frankly - I am just gitty that there is a discussion on here that
does not revolve around the configuration, debug, and hair pulling of
Cisco WLAN.
Of course, that whole discussion by itself might help other vendors and
products look that much better ;-)
Sorry 'bout
Listserv
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chad Frisby
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 11:05 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Site survey requirements
for wireless VOIP
Guys -
Quite frankly - I am just gitty that there is a discussion on here that
Guys -
Quite frankly - I am just gitty that there is a discussion on here that
does not revolve around the configuration, debug, and hair pulling of
Cisco WLAN.
For a while there - I though this the "Educause Cisco Wireless-LAN"
discussion board.
Just a breath of fresh air :)
Chad Frisby
Xirru
Ok, let's explain better the behind the scenes of the decision
to answer both questions:
We are designing coverage with the following criteria:
-b/g everywhere with PDA/Iphone in mind
(we already have 250 Iphones registered on campus, if there is one device
that will take advantage of uninterrup
In addition - even the purpose built VoWi-Fi handsets (Polycom, Cisco,
etc.) are physically larger that iphone and much time is spent designing
antenna's to improve their functionality and RX sensitivity.
Food for thought -
Chad Frisby
Xirrus
303.406.3222
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
