The VSS thing is very nebulous, there was an event the morning I was
replacing a pair of wism2s (in order to return a loan pair - long story).
This is still with TAC and I have not had an explanation of what happened
yet. The symptoms were all HA wisms failing over to the secondary.
Separately,
On 5 Feb 2015, at 9:27, Oliver Elliott wrote:
We have some strange issues with the 6500 VSS at the moment so that
could relate.
If the issues we've seen up to now have been caused by this VSS issue,
8.0.110 seems to have been good so far, still have an ongoing TAC case
so
we'll see what
Hi Danny
We have had some issues with HA mode in the past running 7.4.110. ping to
the gateway would routinely fail causing a failover, at one point both the
primary and secondary failed at once causing an outage. At this point i
disabled HA mode and waited for new software. When 7.6 came around
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Tristan Rhodes
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 10:34 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WISM and Dorm wireless
I don't know any details about pricing, but one benefit of the 5500 appliances
is that you can
8 Gbps / 500 access points = 16 Mbps bandwidth per AP!
The assumption here is all 500 AP are active at the same time consuming 16Mbps
of the 8 Gbps bandwidth. That is not the real world.
On 3/29/2011 at 10:34 AM, Tristan Rhodes tristanrho...@weber.edu wrote:
I don't know any details about
Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter Redhead
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 12:37 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WISM and Dorm wireless
8 Gbps / 500 access points = 16 Mbps bandwidth per AP!
The assumption
Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Tristan Rhodes
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 9:34 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WISM and Dorm wireless
I don't know any details about pricing, but one
Hi Randy,
We finished our wireless deployment into the residential space this past
summer. We deployed a Cisco WiSM solution in our residential router and
manually divided up the Aps to specific controllers with appropriate failovers.
We haven’t seen much trouble with our solution, but I am
Unless Cisco has released their new WiSM based on the 5500-series?, then you'd
be much better off using the new 5500 series 1U controllers as they are
significantly better/faster than the old dual-4400-series based WISM.
The 5500-series 1u appliance now supports 500APs, and unlike the 4400
We have 1,166 Cisco APs (1131s 1142s) deployed in our dorms and apartments.
All are LWAPs under the control of Cisco WiSMs. They are deployed in plain
sight, some in hallways and some in private rooms. I wanted to put them all in
the rooms so we could charge the kid(s) who live there for loss
The WiSM2 (5500 based) was announced this week, though I'm not sure what the
time line will be before you can actually get one on your dock. Based on the
stats they are worth waiting for if you don't have a tight schedule.
In our oldest dorms, we have 1242s mostly wall mounted. We do go
Funny,
The WISM2 (Thanks for the heads up Luke)
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps11634/index.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps11634/index.htmlonly supports up to
500AP's as well.
I don't see a significant advantage over the 5508 controller. (Not like the
orignal WISM over the
As I was told, the WiSM is based on the same single controller hardware as the
5508, with no dual-controller setup like the older 4404-based unit.
Other than saving on uplink ports from the 5508, I too don't see much advantage
unless they are going into an existing 6500 (replacing old WiSMs).
-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of James J J
Hooper
Sent: 10 November 2009 17:39
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WiSM webauth custom login page
--On Tuesday, November 10, 2009 17:14:32 + Jeremy Skelton
j.skel...@lse.ac.uk wrote:
Has anyone got
the biggest issue i have/had with the WiSM 65xx blade technology is
that there is 2 discreet controllers per blade, and each controller has
a 150 AP (less if you have 802.11n AP according to cisco) limit. This
results in an inordinate amount of individual controller
] On Behalf Of Todd M. Hall
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 9:05 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WiSM
Not sure what you mean by the prolong crash, but when we were running
4.1.x
and older code, we had random crashes, sometimes multiple
: Thursday, December 04, 2008 9:05 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WiSM
Not sure what you mean by the prolong crash, but when we were running 4.1.x
and older code, we had random crashes, sometimes multiple controllers would
crash at the same time
Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[EMAIL
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roth, Joe
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 10:42 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WiSM
Leo,
We had a meeting with a Cisco wireless SE to discuss some things that we had
going on here
Millersville University
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[EMAIL
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of leo song
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 8:12 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WiSM
thanks all your replies.
3 confident votes
I forgot to add, we are running 600 ap's on 12 controllers. Before the
start of next semester we will be adding a location appliance and
another 150 ap's and a few more controllers.
Phill Solomon
University of Melbourne
On 04/12/2008, at 18:35, Phill Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We
Not sure what you mean by the prolong crash, but when we were running 4.1.x
and older code, we had random crashes, sometimes multiple controllers would
crash at the same time. Turns out there was a bug in the ssh code on the
controllers. Turned off ssh and no more problems (controllers were
Seven WiSMs running 4.2.112 without any known problems.
-jcw
-
John Watters UA: OIT 205-348-3992
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leo Song
Sent: Wednesday,
8 WiSMs running on 4.2.130. No major issues.
Hector Rios
Louisiana State University
We have 4 WiSMs running 4.2.112 for the better part of a year with no
crashes at all. Our APs, about 800 total, are a mix of 1020s, 1230s, and
b/g/n only 1252s.
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leo Song
Hi Leo,
We run 4.2.130 in 3 4404 controllers. What are the symptoms of your crash
bug? Does the WiSM restart itself? or just hang there without forwarding
any traffic?
Manoj A.
American U.
Leo Song [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
9:58 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] - Cisco WiSM
From:Leo Song [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco WiSM
Hi, folks.
Which WiSM code are you running, 4.1.185 (we are), 4.2.173 or 4.2.130,
etc, etc? we've been suffering the prolong crash bug, the response
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] - Cisco WiSM
We were running 5.0 code and were having problems related to Rogue Detection.
One device would crash every 10 minutes, another every 3 hours and our other
two devices were okay. We disabled rogue detection and didn't have any further
crashing problems
We have been running 5.0.148 for most of the year and have just moved
to 5.1 last weekend because of the web auth bug.
Phill Solomon
University of Melbourne
On 04/12/2008, at 15:32, Leo Song [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, folks.
Which WiSM code are you running, 4.1.185 (we are), 4.2.173
James,
The client should be moved to the vlan specified in Airespace /
Interface-Name attribute, not Tunnel-Group-ID. Do you have a dynamic
interface called np8ss0 in your WLC?
Dennis Xu
Network Analyst(CCS)
University of Guelph
5198244120 x 56217
-Original Message-
From: James J J
Hi Dennis,
Yes there is a np8ss0 dynamic i/f. I have tried combinations of
just the VLAN type attributes and just the airespace attributes and
with both - no joy with either.
-James
On 22 Oct 2007, at 22:35, Dennis Xu wrote:
James,
The client should be moved to the vlan specified in
.
Dennis Xu
Network Analyst(CCS)
University of Guelph
5198244120 x 56217
-Original Message-
From: James J J Hooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October-22-07 5:57 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WISM + Radius to select VLAN
Hi Dennis,
Yes
31 matches
Mail list logo
