U] On Behalf Of Dennis Xu
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 12:24 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Design
Yes ACE is radius session aware. Radius stickiness has been configured for ACS
servers.
---
Dennis Xu
Network Analyst, Computing and Communication Ser
RELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 12:15:13 PM
Subject: RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Design
TAC has confirmed the problem and has not yet offered a work around to LB. The
LB is manually pointing controllers to one of the two RADIUS servers, which
helps, but of course is no
AM
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Design
We are having this exact issue and have been working with TAC for a month. We
have clients that are mis -configured pounding the RADIUS servers, and one by
one we are identifying and blacklisting devices that have never been on the
network. This
exist?
Thanks.
---
Dennis Xu
Network Analyst, Computing and Communication Services
University of Guelph
5198244120 x 56217
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Boardman"
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 11:55:31 AM
Subject: Re: [WI
.EDU>>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:27:48 -0400
To:
mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless design
Just to chime in the topic of restricting traffic- bear in mind that
applications like Facetime and synching things like Documents to Go betwee
011 9:29 pm
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless design
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> The real short answer is that it does not matter what the IP address
of the AP is, as long as it has good stable communications with the
controller.
> What I personally try to do is what you ar
uent Group Listserv
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:30:50
To:
Reply-to: Craig Simons
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless design
Bruce,
For administrative reasons, we find it very helpful to have all our wireless
users contained to "wireless only" IP ranges. This way, we can configure our
etwork Services
Craig Simons
Network and Systems Administrator
Phone: 778-782-8036
Cell: 604-649-7977
Email: craigsim...@sfu.ca
Twitter: simonscraig
- Original Message -
From: "Mike King"
To: WIRELESS-LAN@listserv.educause.edu
Sent: Wednesday, 8 June, 2011 18:15:06
S
Bruce,
We install our APs in the same subnet as our users (for reasons mentioned by
others as well: it seems that
rogue detection works better on the wire side that way), but with private IP
addresses.
The gateway as two subnets (one primary and one secondary).
Primary is for users, secondary is
Can that system bridge at the AP? We are going to have a secure network and an open one. The secure network will be configured with 802.1x and will just dump people on the local VLAN of the building. Once we have the network fully secure we will be fine with this. I like this for performance re
The real short answer is that it does not matter what the IP address of the
AP is, as long as it has good stable communications with the controller.
What I personally try to do is what you are proposing, put the APs for each
building/floor it's own subnet.
Good luck
Mike
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at
Date: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 5:34 pm
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Design for Arenas
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> 802.1x or MAC filtering, or both... In a previous life I supported
> wirelessfor a large manufacturer with myriad dumb devices (thatis
> dev
802.1x or MAC filtering, or both... In a previous life I supported wireless
for a large manufacturer with myriad dumb devices (thatis devices that
couldn¹t do 802.1x) so we did a mix an SSID that did MAC filtering for DUMB
devices and a SSID for 802.1x
On 12/10/08 3:30 PM, "John Duran" <[EMAIL PR
13 matches
Mail list logo
