https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|High|Low
CC|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.sequans.com/sh
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.sequans.com/sh |https://bugs.wireshark.org/
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #2 from hhw ---
(In reply to hhw from comment #0)
> Created attachment 15442 [details]
> illegally sms reassembly due to have different sm-RP-DA
>
> Build Information:
> Version 2.0.2 (v2.0.2-0-ga16e22e from master-2.0)
> -
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
shafaghja...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCO
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
hhw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Low |Medium
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|Major |Enhancement
--
You are receivin
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #3 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 21306 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin:
GSM SMS: optionally use GSM-MAP info to perform reassembly (off by default)
https://code.wireshark.org/review/21306
--
You are r
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #4 from hhw ---
(In reply to Gerrit Code Review from comment #3)
> Change 21306 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin:
> GSM SMS: optionally use GSM-MAP info to perform reassembly (off by default)
>
> https://code
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #5 from Pascal Quantin ---
It means that you will have a GSM SMS dissector preference to toggle to
activate the feature.
It is off by default as I found some previous captures where the SM-RP-OA/DA
field is not always present,
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #6 from hhw ---
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #5)
> It means that you will have a GSM SMS dissector preference to toggle to
> activate the feature.
> It is off by default as I found some previous captures where the S
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #7 from Pascal Quantin ---
If you took a precompiled binary, this is normal as the patch was not merged
yet.
If you built yourself, then in GSM SMS dissector options you must activate the
new setting asking to take into account
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #8 from hhw ---
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #7)
> If you took a precompiled binary, this is normal as the patch was not merged
> yet.
> If you built yourself, then in GSM SMS dissector options you must activate
> t
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #9 from hhw ---
in GSM_SMS over gsm_map-tcap We have 2 scenario:
Scenario 1:
Each part of sms submit/deliver in a Separate dialog(Transaction Capabilities
Application Part), in this scenario each part has sm_RP_DA field that
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #10 from Pascal Quantin ---
(In reply to hhw from comment #9)
> in GSM_SMS over gsm_map-tcap We have 2 scenario:
>
> Scenario 1:
> Each part of sms submit/deliver in a Separate dialog(Transaction
> Capabilities Application Pa
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #11 from hhw ---
More details are in attachments:scenario1.PNG, scenario2.PNG
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.__
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #12 from hhw ---
Created attachment 15500
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15500&action=edit
scenario1 of sms reassembly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #13 from hhw ---
Created attachment 15501
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15501&action=edit
scenario2 of sms reassembly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #14 from hhw ---
(In reply to hhw from comment #11)
> More details are in attachments:scenario1.PNG, scenario2.PNG
in some cases because of delay in network, segments are not submited /deliverd
Respectively
--
You are recei
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #15 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 21320 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin:
GSM SMS: add more lower layer info for reassembly and switch preference to on
by default
https://code.wireshark.org/review/21320
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
hhw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #15501|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #17 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 21354 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin:
GSM SMS: Use SIP To / From tapped addresses for reassembly
https://code.wireshark.org/review/21354
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #18 from hhw ---
(In reply to Gerrit Code Review from comment #17)
> Change 21354 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin:
> GSM SMS: Use SIP To / From tapped addresses for reassembly
>
> https://code.wireshark.org/
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #19 from hhw ---
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #10)
> (In reply to hhw from comment #9)
> > in GSM_SMS over gsm_map-tcap We have 2 scenario:
> >
> > Scenario 1:
> > Each part of sms submit/deliver in a Separate dia
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #20 from Pascal Quantin ---
As explained previously, this is not straightforward. So it will be done once
someone feels motivated enough to do it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes._
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #21 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 21397 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin:
GSM MAP: use TCP OTID to retrieve SM-RP-OA and SM-RP-DA fields
https://code.wireshark.org/review/21397
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #22 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 21397 merged by Anders Broman:
GSM MAP: use TCAP OTID to retrieve SM-RP-OA and SM-RP-DA fields when required
https://code.wireshark.org/review/21397
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|CONFIRM
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #24 from hhw ---
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #23)
> For now I let S1AP / RANAP out of scope.
thank you very much. but I have a question.
In new attachment(SMS_IMSI2) the sm_RP_DA of the 3 parts are same and we are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #25 from hhw ---
Created attachment 15513
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15513&action=edit
SMS_Reassembly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes._
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #26 from hhw ---
hello. i have a question.
In multipart SMS, if all parts are existed then wireshark is reassembeld them.
i want to reassemble a multipart SMS even though one part is not existed ? for
example(attachment:sms_pa
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #28 from Pascal Quantin ---
(In reply to hhw from comment #24)
> (In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #23)
> > For now I let S1AP / RANAP out of scope.
>
> thank you very much. but I have a question.
> In new attachment(SM
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #27 from hhw ---
Created attachment 15514
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15514&action=edit
sms_part
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #29 from Pascal Quantin ---
(In reply to hhw from comment #26)
> hello. i have a question.
>
> In multipart SMS, if all parts are existed then wireshark is reassembeld
> them. i want to reassemble a multipart SMS even though o
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #30 from hhw ---
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #28)
> (In reply to hhw from comment #24)
> > (In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #23)
> > > For now I let S1AP / RANAP out of scope.
> >
> > thank you very much.
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #31 from hhw ---
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #28)
> (In reply to hhw from comment #24)
> > (In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #23)
> > > For now I let S1AP / RANAP out of scope.
> >
> > thank you very much.
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #32 from Pascal Quantin ---
If you crafted again a capture where you purposely removed the packet giving
the sm-rp-oa/da real value, then the behavior seen is expected.
The otid is used to retrieve the previously seen sm-rp-oa/
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #33 from hhw ---
I should say that all of the bugs I said is in a real traffic and the last
problem also is in a real traffic!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes._
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #34 from Pascal Quantin ---
So you have a network sending SMS (with test content) to multiple UEs with the
same message identifier each time and lost packets. This is unlucky.
For your last use case, no GSM MAP identity is not
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #35 from Pascal Quantin ---
We could tighten even more the checks but in case of filtered packets you might
end with non reassembled packets while they should, or the opposite. OTID could
presumably be reused later on. The code
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #36 from shafaghja...@gmail.com ---
what an interesting topic!
I read all the comments and I think for the last bug (comment 31) if we have
this situation (in a real traffic or hand made data) wireshark should not
reassemble th
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #37 from Pascal Quantin ---
(In reply to shafaghjahad from comment #36)
> what an interesting topic!
> I read all the comments and I think for the last bug (comment 31) if we have
> this situation (in a real traffic or hand ma
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #38 from shafaghja...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #28)
> (In reply to hhw from comment #24)
> > (In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #23)
> > > For now I let S1AP / RANAP out of scope.
> >
> > tha
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #39 from Pascal Quantin ---
(In reply to shafaghjahad from comment #38)
> (In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #28)
> > (In reply to hhw from comment #24)
> > > (In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #23)
> > > > For now
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #40 from shafaghja...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #39)
> (In reply to shafaghjahad from comment #38)
> > (In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #28)
> > > (In reply to hhw from comment #24)
> > > > (
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #41 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 21425 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin:
GSM SMS: use TCAP OTID as last resort for reassembly when GSM MAP does not give
info
https://code.wireshark.org/review/21425
--
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #42 from Pascal Quantin ---
(In reply to Gerrit Code Review from comment #41)
> Change 21425 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin:
> GSM SMS: use TCAP OTID as last resort for reassembly when GSM MAP does not
> giv
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #43 from hhw ---
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #42)
> (In reply to Gerrit Code Review from comment #41)
> > Change 21425 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin:
> > GSM SMS: use TCAP OTID as last resort f
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
--- Comment #44 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 21425 merged by Pascal Quantin:
GSM SMS: use TCAP OTID as last resort for reassembly when GSM MAP does not give
info
https://code.wireshark.org/review/21425
--
You are receiving this ma
49 matches
Mail list logo
