Hi,
Very well. Hopefully I get some time this week to get to it.
Thanx,
Jaap
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joerg Mayer
Sent: 2008-Jun-01 00:14
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Two versions of wiresh
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 11:51:25PM +0200, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> Anyone a pointer to where this stuff is defined?
The desktop file format documentation is referenced in the file.
ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We are stuck with technolog
I decided to unsubscribe while I was on vacation. I received a confirmation
email, but I am still receiving emails from wireshark-dev
Bill
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wire
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 10:49:08PM +0200, Stig Bj?rlykke wrote:
> On 31. mai. 2008, at 18.44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Update Debian packaging files for Wireshark 1.0.
> > These files build the package with all features and
> > minimum changes from the released sources.
>
>
> 1. Why can't
Hi,
1. Debian packaging tools are very picky about it. It has to be in debian/
under the sources' root.
2. sensible browser doesn't have to be present on the build machine. This
would create an extra build dependancy.
Thanx,
Jaap
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Hi,
Yes, the desktop file in root is probably used for other packaging purposes
as well. I haven't looked into
The desktop file standards stuff to know what is current practice, what is
old, and what is supported on the
Various platforms.
Anyone a pointer to where this stuff is defined?
Thanx,
Ja
On 31. mai. 2008, at 18.44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Update Debian packaging files for Wireshark 1.0.
> These files build the package with all features and
> minimum changes from the released sources.
1. Why can't we have the debian package in the "packaging" directory,
with all the other pa
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 10:07:25PM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> it looks like they are still providing an older version of our desktop file.
OK, verified the above statement. The only additional thing is:
Icon=hi48-app-wireshark.png
They also seem to feel a need to provide an absolute path to the e
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 09:55:24PM +0200, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> I'll have a look at both wireshark.desktop files. Any file for Debian
> packaging purposes *must* be in the debian/ directory, that's 'the Debian
> way'. The one in the top I'm not sure of, yet.
I'll take a look what can be merged into
Hello Guy,
I'll have a look at both wireshark.desktop files. Any file for Debian
packaging purposes *must* be in the debian/ directory, that's 'the Debian
way'. The one in the top I'm not sure of, yet.
I also considered the status of wireshark-root.desktop. First of all it's
not used by default i
John Smith wrote:
> You might be interested to know that apparently, Coverity is currently
> offering a free trial of their static source code analysis tool
> 'Coverity Prevent for C/C++'. They have received good critique's in
> the past by covering the code of open source products.
We're already
Hi,
You might be interested to know that apparently, Coverity is currently
offering a free trial of their static source code analysis tool
'Coverity Prevent for C/C++'. They have received good critique's in
the past by covering the code of open source products.
I just thought that you might be in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=25406
>
> User: jake
> Date: 2008/05/31 09:44 AM
>
> Log:
> Update Debian packaging files for Wireshark 1.0.
> These files build the package with all features and
> minimum changes from the released sou
13 matches
Mail list logo
