Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark-dev Digest, Vol 31, Issue 8

2008-12-04 Thread Shouwei LI
dy help me ? > > Thanks in advance > > Regards > > _ > In?dit ! Des Emotic?nes D?jant?es! Installez les dans votre Messenger ! > http://www.ilovemessenger.fr/Emoticones/EmoticonesDejantees.aspx > -- ne

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Building Wireshark - Using nmake

2008-12-04 Thread philippe alarcon
Hello, I had not understood calling vcvars32.bat has to be made each time a new dos session is opened. You are right, it is well mentioned in the guide ! I have written a batch to make all this automatic. May be this will be useful for others : cd C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Ubuntu-7.10-x86-64

2008-12-04 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Ubuntu-7.10-x86-64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Ubuntu-7.10-x86-64/builds/486 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: ubuntu-7.10-x86 Buil

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Bits Dissect Issue

2008-12-04 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, Would proto_tree_add_bits_item() do the trick? Thanx, Jaap Sean wrote: > Hi, > > I want to dissect a packet, each field of this packet is not byte aligned, > and the bits mask position of each field is not fixed. The position is > determined by some bits in the content. > For example, the

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-x86

2008-12-04 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/1304 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86 Build Reason: Bui

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (release) on Windows-XP-x86

2008-12-04 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-x86 on Wireshark (release). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/release/builders/Windows-XP-x86/builds/2 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/release/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-x86 Build Reason:

[Wireshark-dev] Bits Dissect Issue

2008-12-04 Thread Sean
Hi, I want to dissect a packet, each field of this packet is not byte aligned, and the bits mask position of each field is not fixed. The position is determined by some bits in the content. For example, the following packet: F1 has one bit, F2 has 3 bits, F3 has 10 bits, F4 has 1 bit, F5 has 1 b

[Wireshark-dev] [Fwd: Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 26904: /trunk/plugins/unistim/ /trunk/plugins/unistim/: packet-unistim.c]

2008-12-04 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hello Don, Seems that your unistim patch didn't go down well, so has basically been reverted. Could you please work with Bill ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and Joerg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) to get this heuristics things out of the way? Thanx, Jaap Original Message Subject: Re: [Wireshark-d

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Building Wireshark - Using nmake

2008-12-04 Thread Graham Bloice
philippe alarcon wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to build the application under Windows XP. > > In order to see if my environment is correct, > I have tried to build WSUTIL module. > > I have used the basic command : nmake -f Makefile.nmake > > My problem is that the make file doesn't find win32.ma

[Wireshark-dev] Building Wireshark - Using nmake

2008-12-04 Thread philippe alarcon
Hello, I am trying to build the application under Windows XP. In order to see if my environment is correct, I have tried to build WSUTIL module. I have used the basic command : nmake -f Makefile.nmake My problem is that the make file doesn't find win32.mak. I have not found this file. Could

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 26904: /trunk/plugins/unistim/ /trunk/plugins/unistim/: packet-unistim.c

2008-12-04 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:20:25AM +0100, Jaap Keuter wrote: > Care to comment on this one? > Frankly I'm getting tired of going back and forth with this thing. > Can't we sort it out once and for all? The only comment I can give is, that in current svn head using port 5000 for Unistim still eat

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Ubuntu-7.10-x86-64

2008-12-04 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Ubuntu-7.10-x86-64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Ubuntu-7.10-x86-64/builds/484 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: ubuntu-7.10-x86 Buil