On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 06:43:58AM +0100, Tobias Erichsen wrote:
> Why is that? I took the template-code for dissectors from the
> README.developer where it explicitely states that one should check if
> this column is active - is this not valid anymore?
It doesn't mention that it should no lon
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Ubuntu-9.10-x64 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Ubuntu-9.10-x64/builds/118
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: ubuntu-9.10-x64
Build Reas
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 08:11:44AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> I notice some wireshark windows have the title "The Wireshark..."
> Well, it should just be "Wireshark ...", else all the user will see is
> "The " when his windows become many.
Please open an enhancement bug at https://bugs
Hi Jaap,
thanks for your feedback:
> - Convert to build in dissectors, there's no reason not to.
Done that.
> - Remove calls to check_col()
Why is that? I took the template-code for dissectors from the
README.developer
where it explicitely states that one should check if this column is active
On Feb 2, 2010, at 2:32 PM, s...@wireshark.org wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=31774
>
> User: stig
> Date: 2010/02/02 02:32 PM
>
> Log:
> Added protocol name to "Reassembled length" text.
>
> Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
> ChangesPath
Stephen Fisher wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:54:40PM +0100, Benjamin Meyer wrote:
>
>> Lately 1.2.6 and 1.0.11 were released.
>> How are the plans for a development release like 1.3.3?
>
> Not sure - Gerald will have to answer this. In the mean time, you could
> grab a daily build for the
Hi,
I would like to bring some attention to the mentioned bug [1].
The problem has been reported as a wishlist item several times to the
Debian BTS. Probably other distributions would be happy, too, to be able
package the documentation for Wireshark in an easy way.
Since the bug did not receiv
HAUER-PAVLIK Manfred wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On the Wireshark homepage, the date for the „Latest Release 1.2.6” is
> mistakenly
>
> stated as “2009”. Didn’t find a proper email for notification, so I
> tried wireshark-dev instead.
Fixed. Thanks!
_
If you haven't already done so, you might try running "nmake -f Makefile.nmake
distclean" and then try recompiling from scratch.
- Chris
-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of ivan jr sy
Sent: Tuesday, Febru
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Solaris-10-SPARC on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Solaris-10-SPARC/builds/948
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: solaris-10-sparc
Build R
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/1349
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86
Build Reason:
Bui
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-PowerPC on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-PowerPC/builds/1053
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-ppc
Build Reas
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-x86 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-XP-x86/builds/903
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-x86
Build Reason:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/226
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64
Build Reason:
B
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Ubuntu-9.10-x64 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Ubuntu-9.10-x64/builds/115
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: ubuntu-9.10-x64
Build Reas
Martin Warnes wrote:
> Bill Meier wrote:
>> Martin Warnes wrote:
>>
>>> Unhandled exception ("proto.c:4238: failed assertion "hfinfo->display ==
>>> BASE_NONE"", group=1, code=4)
>>>
>>>
>>
>>> I'm guessing something may have changed that needs to be rolled into
>>> the JGroups code bu
ivan jr sy wrote:
> Yes. I even have tried to create another source directory, svn update it and
> same problem.
>
> I used the same Vista to build WS.
>
> --- On Wed, 2/3/10, Bill Meier wrote:
>
>> From: Bill Meier
>> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Cannot open source file: 'ascend_scanner.c'
>
Version: 1.2.6-1
I notice some wireshark windows have the title "The Wireshark..."
Well, it should just be "Wireshark ...", else all the user will see is
"The " when his windows become many.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev maili
Hi all,
currently i am using wireshark1.0.6 . i have some issues with this version
1. this version is not supporting XSDs
2.this version is not supporting DTDs with namespaces
can any one suggest me which version of wireshark supports this issues?
thanks in advance
thanks and regards
amar
Hi,
On the Wireshark homepage, the date for the "Latest Release 1.2.6" is
mistakenly
stated as "2009". Didn't find a proper email for notification, so I tried
wireshark-dev instead.
Maybe one can forward this appropriately.
many thanks for this very important and useful product anyway!
Bill Meier wrote:
> Martin Warnes wrote:
>
>> Unhandled exception ("proto.c:4238: failed assertion "hfinfo->display ==
>> BASE_NONE"", group=1, code=4)
>>
>>
>
>
>> I'm guessing something may have changed that needs to be rolled into
>> the JGroups code but I just can't figure it out,
Yes. I even have tried to create another source directory, svn update it and
same problem.
I used the same Vista to build WS.
--- On Wed, 2/3/10, Bill Meier wrote:
> From: Bill Meier
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Cannot open source file: 'ascend_scanner.c'
> To: "Developer support list for W
ivan jr sy wrote:
>
> bash -o igncr ..\tools\runlex.sh "flex" -oascend_scanner.c
> ascend_scanne
> r.l
The above step should generate ascend_scanner.c. It must be failing for
some reason.
Has this worked previously ??
__
Hi All,
when I svn update my copy and build it on windows, there is an error during
build early in the process which shows:
Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 9.00.21022.08
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
cd ..
cd codecs
"c:\Prog
24 matches
Mail list logo
