On Jun 28, 2011, at 4:45 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
On Jun 27, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Michael Tüxen wrote:
It is fixed in r37806. The currently
tshark -i lo0 -i en0 -f icmp sctp
will use sctp as the default capture filter. This means that the above is
the same as
tshark -f sctp -i lo0 -i en0
Can you please update the manpage to document the behavior of the different
types?
Thanks
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 05:58:35PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
We have about 240 calls to strerror().
...and, unfortunately, a variant that converts to UTF-8 and is API-compatible
is non-trivial,
as any version that allocates a buffer for the result of the conversion would
leak memory
we
On Jun 28, 2011, at 9:26 AM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
Can you please update the manpage to document the behavior of the different
types?
ahhh. I missed that... I'll do.
Best regards
Michael
Thanks
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de
We are
On Jun 28, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Michael Tüxen wrote:
On Jun 28, 2011, at 4:45 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
On Jun 27, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Michael Tüxen wrote:
It is fixed in r37806. The currently
tshark -i lo0 -i en0 -f icmp sctp
will use sctp as the default capture filter. This means that the
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Jakub Zawadzki
darkjames...@darkjames.pl wrote:
g_strerror() ?
Yes, of course :) Thank you.
--
Stig Bjørlykke
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
On 28/06/2011 01:58, Guy Harris wrote:
2) Windows, where Unicode generally means UTF-16, and APIs that
return strings encoded as sequences of octets rather than hexadectets
probably return strings in the local code page.
Is this a first sighting of a new word hexadectet? Google
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:14:34AM +0200, Stig Bj?rlykke wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Jakub Zawadzki
darkjames...@darkjames.pl wrote:
g_strerror() ?
Yes, of course :) Thank you.
no problem ;-)
Btw. I know that nowadays I'm the only one who uses non-utf locales on console,
but
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Jakub Zawadzki
darkjames...@darkjames.pl wrote:
Btw. I know that nowadays I'm the only one who uses non-utf locales on
console,
but when we print on console (stdout/stderr) I think we should use strerror()
from libc,
i.e. strerror() which don't recode
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:58 AM, Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
1) UN*Xes where LANG etc. aren't set to a locale with UTF-8 as the
encoding (are you seeing the issue with Norwegian characters on your system?
If so, what's the setting of LANG?);
I only had issues with Norwegian
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/2215
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64
Build Reason:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Ubuntu-10.04-x64 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Ubuntu-10.04-x64/builds/1609
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: ubuntu-10.04-x64
Build
On Jun 28, 2011, at 2:25 AM, Graham Bloice wrote:
On 28/06/2011 01:58, Guy Harris wrote:
2) Windows, where Unicode generally means UTF-16, and APIs that
return strings encoded as sequences of octets rather than hexadectets
probably return strings in the local code page.
Is this a
On Jun 28, 2011, at 3:22 AM, Jakub Zawadzki wrote:
Btw. I know that nowadays I'm the only one who uses non-utf locales on
console,
but when we print on console (stdout/stderr) I think we should use strerror()
from libc,
i.e. strerror() which don't recode message to utf-8.
It's more
On Jun 28, 2011, at 3:33 AM, Stig Bjørlykke wrote:
Do we always know where the error message is used?
I suspect file_open_error_message() is used both in GUI and tshark.
Yes - it's in epan.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev
On Jun 28, 2011, at 6:10 AM, Stig Bjørlykke wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:58 AM, Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
1) UN*Xes where LANG etc. aren't set to a locale with UTF-8 as the
encoding (are you seeing the issue with Norwegian characters on your system?
If so, what's the
On Jun 28, 2011, at 10:01 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
In any case, that means that using strerror() is probably not going to be
sufficient to fix the problem. What we might want to do is use UTF-8
everywhere we can, and, for non-GUI output, convert to the appropriate
character encoding -
On Jun 28, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
when putting them into a textual representation of the protocol tree or
into columns or something else to be shown to humans, map them to UTF-8, with
anything that can't be mapped to UTF-8 - including, if the encoding is
putatively
On Jun 28, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
On Jun 28, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
when putting them into a textual representation of the protocol tree or
into columns or something else to be shown to humans, map them to UTF-8,
with anything that can't be mapped to
On Jun 28, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
We have an issue regarding strings in packets in general. Strings might be
in a number of encodings, including ASCII (meaning that any byte with the 8th
bit set is something that shouldn't be there), other national variants of ISO
646,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
OK, what OS are you using?
Snow:~ stig$ uname -a
Darwin Snow.local 10.8.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10.8.0: Tue Jun 7
16:33:36 PDT 2011; root:xnu-1504.15.3~1/RELEASE_I386 i386
Snow:~ stig$ echo $LANG
Snow:~ stig$ gcc norsk.c -o
On Jun 28, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Stig Bjørlykke wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
OK, what OS are you using?
Snow:~ stig$ uname -a
Darwin ...
Well, that answers *that* question. :-)
So the locale's encoding should probably be UTF-8, given that it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm proud to announce the release of Wireshark 1.2.18.
NOTE: The 1.2.x series of Wireshark releases will reach end of life on
June 30, 2011. If you are still using Wireshark 1.2 we strongly
encourage you to upgrade to 1.6.
What is Wireshark?
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
However, if LANG is blank, you presumably don't have Terminal set up to Set
local enviornment variables on startup (Preferences Settings Advanced,
at the bottom);
Actually I have Set local environment variables on startup
Hi Team,
I writing a dissector, in which I need to compare the time stamp in
application level with the arrival time stamp which has been displayed under
frame tree of wireshark. How can I access this arrival time from dissector?
Thanks in Advance
Regards,
Sagar
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/2221
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64
Build Reason:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis on
Wireshark (development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis/builds/1133
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build:
27 matches
Mail list logo
