On 03/04/15 04:07, Michal Labedzki wrote:
On 03/03/15 11:50, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
And also if i remember the target is only have CMake for build system
(and remove autofoo...)
I hope there will be only CMake in near future (imply remove
autotools). As I know cmake aka build systems working
When starting Wireshark with a specific trace file (unfortunately confidential),
I get the following message on startup (git head):
/home/jmayer/work/wireshark/git/ui/qt/packet_list.cpp:537:13: runtime error:
load of value 9, which is not a valid value for type 'bool'
Does this provide enough
On 4 March 2015 at 16:44, Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/04/15 04:07, Michal Labedzki wrote:
On 03/03/15 11:50, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
And also if i remember the target is only have CMake for build system
(and remove autofoo...)
I hope there will be only CMake in
On 4 March 2015 at 19:04, Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/04/15 11:55, Graham Bloice wrote:
On 4 March 2015 at 16:44, Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com
mailto:jeff.morriss...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/04/15 04:07, Michal Labedzki wrote:
On 03/03/15
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm proud to announce the release of Wireshark 1.10.13.
__
What is Wireshark?
Wireshark is the world's most popular network protocol analyzer. It is
used for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm proud to announce the release of Wireshark 1.12.4.
__
What is Wireshark?
Wireshark is the world's most popular network protocol analyzer. It is
used for troubleshooting,
On Mar 4, 2015, at 7:29 AM, Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de wrote:
When starting Wireshark with a specific trace file (unfortunately
confidential),
I get the following message on startup (git head):
/home/jmayer/work/wireshark/git/ui/qt/packet_list.cpp:537:13: runtime error:
load of value
On 03/04/15 11:55, Graham Bloice wrote:
On 4 March 2015 at 16:44, Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com
mailto:jeff.morriss...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/04/15 04:07, Michal Labedzki wrote:
On 03/03/15 11:50, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
And also if i remember the
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/04/15 11:55, Graham Bloice wrote:
On 4 March 2015 at 16:44, Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com
mailto:jeff.morriss...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/04/15 04:07, Michal Labedzki wrote:
On
On 4 March 2015 at 20:58, Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/04/15 14:10, Graham Bloice wrote:
On 4 March 2015 at 19:04, Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com
mailto:jeff.morriss...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/04/15 11:55, Graham Bloice wrote:
On 4 March 2015 at
On 03/04/15 14:10, Graham Bloice wrote:
On 4 March 2015 at 19:04, Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com
mailto:jeff.morriss...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/04/15 11:55, Graham Bloice wrote:
On 4 March 2015 at 16:44, Jeff Morriss
jeff.morriss...@gmail.com
On 4 March 2015 at 20:58, Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/04/15 14:10, Graham Bloice wrote:
On 4 March 2015 at 19:04, Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com
mailto:jeff.morriss...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/04/15 11:55, Graham Bloice wrote:
On 4 March 2015 at
On 03/04/15 16:24, Graham Bloice wrote:
And what is an easy cross-compilation target to aim for (with Ubuntu
as the host OS)?
I'm not sure there is an easy cross-compilation target. I just know
people sometimes come here asking questions or reporting problems.
P.S. Practically there isn't much real difference between those
releases and the ones available via
https://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/ - if you need a more
recent pre-built version in the mean time that's probably where you
should go.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Evan Huus
On 4 March 2015 at 22:09, Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/04/15 16:24, Graham Bloice wrote:
And what is an easy cross-compilation target to aim for (with Ubuntu
as the host OS)?
I'm not sure there is an easy cross-compilation target. I just know
people sometimes
Hi folks,
Is there a schedule for a 1.99.3 release?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Archives:
Gerald might have one in mind, but typically we seem to be hitting
about 2 months between dev snapshots. 1.99.2 was released at the
beginning of February, so that suggests to me around the beginning of
April.
Evan
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Richard Sharpe
realrichardsha...@gmail.com wrote:
I scheduled a release for tomorrow (March 5).
On 3/4/15 2:08 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
Gerald might have one in mind, but typically we seem to be hitting
about 2 months between dev snapshots. 1.99.2 was released at the
beginning of February, so that suggests to me around the beginning of
April.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com wrote:
P.S. Practically there isn't much real difference between those
releases and the ones available via
https://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/ - if you need a more
recent pre-built version in the mean time that's probably
Ok, now I have a little experience with Transifex, it seems to be ok.
But there is one more question.
Example :)
1. Michał translate xxx (English) to yyy (in Polish)
2. Evil Alexis change my yyy to yya (Michał do not know about that?)
3. Neutral TxPullBot pull changes to our Gerrit.
I suppose that
20 matches
Mail list logo
