On Sat, 15 Jan 2022 at 18:55, Gerald Combs wrote:
> On 1/15/22 4:37 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
> > On Jan 15, 2022, at 3:09 AM, Gisle Vanem wrote:
> >
> >> Anders Broman wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>> Yes sounds like a good idea. Have been contemplating testing it too.
> >>
> >> I just installed the "Bu
On 1/15/22 4:37 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
On Jan 15, 2022, at 3:09 AM, Gisle Vanem wrote:
Anders Broman wrote:
Hi,
Yes sounds like a good idea. Have been contemplating testing it too.
I just installed the "Build Tools for Visual Studio 2022"
https://visualstudio.microsoft.com/downloads/#bui
Its the later.
Am Sa., 15. Jan. 2022 um 13:38 Uhr schrieb Guy Harris :
> On Jan 15, 2022, at 3:09 AM, Gisle Vanem wrote:
>
> > Anders Broman wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> Yes sounds like a good idea. Have been contemplating testing it too.
> >
> > I just installed the "Build Tools for Visual Studio 2
On Jan 15, 2022, at 3:09 AM, Gisle Vanem wrote:
> Anders Broman wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Yes sounds like a good idea. Have been contemplating testing it too.
>
> I just installed the "Build Tools for Visual Studio 2022"
>
> https://visualstudio.microsoft.com/downloads/#build-tools-for-visual-studio
One of the main features I would be looking at was better arm64 support. Right
now compiling a native Wireshark version for Windows arm64 is a nightmare
The compilers can do it, the tool chain can’t really
> Am 15.01.2022 um 12:09 schrieb Gisle Vanem :
>
> Anders Broman wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Yes
Anders Broman wrote:
Hi,
Yes sounds like a good idea. Have been contemplating testing it too.
I just installed the "Build Tools for Visual Studio 2022"
https://visualstudio.microsoft.com/downloads/#build-tools-for-visual-studio-2022
But was disappointed it does not include a newer compiler
