Re: [Wireshark-dev] Description of Wireshark User's Guide 4.3.0

2023-11-06 Thread Eugène Adell
Hi Machiko, it seems this Guide did not always evolve at the same pace than the implementation for this part. I confirm that in fact a Spurious Retrans cannot be SYN or FIN flagged as it is an ordinary data packet for which Wireshark has already seen an acknowledgement ( = that ACK was either

Re: [Wireshark-dev] DBUILD_logray=ON breaks linking

2022-10-04 Thread Eugène Adell
com/wireshark/wireshark/-/blob/master/ui/logray/logray_main_window.h > > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 9:04 AM Eugène Adell > wrote: > >> Yes Chuck, I did that multiple times, and just before pushing my latest >> code. >> >> Le mar. 27 sept. 2022 à 15:57, chuck c

Re: [Wireshark-dev] CARES to old for CentOS8?

2022-09-28 Thread Eugène Adell
Hello, did you try compiling c-ares from source code, then adding the generated lib to the system ( by adding a file /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ and updating the links with ldconfig -v ) ? I'm getting this when checking the above compilation/update, which finds the newly installed lib : # ldd

Re: [Wireshark-dev] DBUILD_logray=ON breaks linking

2022-09-27 Thread Eugène Adell
Yes Chuck, I did that multiple times, and just before pushing my latest code. Le mar. 27 sept. 2022 à 15:57, chuck c a écrit : > > Since you have been working on it for a while, have you updated your master > and rebased the MR branch? > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 7:06 AM Eugè

[Wireshark-dev] DBUILD_logray=ON breaks linking

2022-09-27 Thread Eugène Adell
Hi all, I've been working on MR !2445 for a while and almost finished this work, things were going rather well until DBUILD_logray=ON was added on the "Job Code Checks + Clang Warnings" job. It's still compiling and linking on my dev environment, but adding DBUILD_logray=ON is reproducing the

[Wireshark-dev] please close issue 12805

2021-10-13 Thread Eugène Adell
Hello, anyone with sufficient rights please close : https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/issues/12805 I didn't pay attention but it's in fact the very same than 16919 that was solved some time ago (cause : SRC < DST leading to a wrong identification of the conversation initiator). best

[Wireshark-dev] please close issue 12800

2021-06-04 Thread Eugène Adell
Hello, anyone with sufficient rights please close : https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/issues/12800 ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Status label for issues

2021-04-26 Thread Eugène Adell
Hello, "Furthermore a normal user is not allowed to set labels at the moment." That's true. How to request a "close issue" in the proper way ? Unluckily commenting is not always enough to get attention. For example, please anyone have a look at

[Wireshark-dev] some more sample captures

2021-04-21 Thread Eugène Adell
t them on the SampleCaptures page. > > Thanks for your contribution, > Jaap > > > On 8 Dec 2019, at 16:41, Eugène Adell wrote: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > I would like to add some captures on the dedicated wiki page. My > > username : EugeneAdell &

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Clearly, someone thought no one should be using CommView after 2038

2021-04-18 Thread Eugène Adell
Hello, probably the guy writing this considered the "Epochalypse" problem. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem if necessary. best regards E.A. Le lun. 19 avr. 2021 à 04:18, Richard Sharpe a écrit : > > Hi folks, > > I just came across this validation check in the commview

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Season of Docs - Announcements] The 2021 Season of Docs application for organizations is open!

2021-02-21 Thread Eugène Adell
Hello, I don't see any mention to the doc/README.* files in this wiki, which are essential but sometimes a bit harsh. For example README.dissector is almost 4000 lines long without any Table of Content (but there's a numerotation for the paragraphs which could help building it), one doesn't

Re: [Wireshark-dev] pipeline failed at the Restore Cache step

2020-09-13 Thread Eugène Adell
hi guys, is anything missing on my branch or are we just waiting for a code review ? thanks and good week-end Eugene Le jeu. 10 sept. 2020 à 14:28, Eugène Adell a écrit : > > Thanks Dario, it's now fixed (it seems some switch/case blocks allow > empty lines but not others ?) > >

Re: [Wireshark-dev] pipeline failed at the Restore Cache step

2020-09-10 Thread Eugène Adell
> + > epan/dissectors/packet-tcp.c:1404: trailing whitespace. > > Fix them, amend your commit, rebase on master, push force and the CI will > start again. > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:57 AM Eugène Adell wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> My pipeline is in error

[Wireshark-dev] pipeline failed at the Restore Cache step

2020-09-10 Thread Eugène Adell
Hi guys, My pipeline is in error ( branch 16716 Pipeline #188182176 ) and I don't know what to do. My branch which was first on Gerrit, I followed what is said in the doc to move it as a Merge Request and finally it asked for a Rebase, which I ran this morning and ended with this error. The

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Gitlab doesn't show all epan/dissectors/ files.

2020-09-09 Thread Eugène Adell
Hello, I have the very same behavior, my browser being Firefox 80.0 (64 bits) Le mer. 9 sept. 2020 à 20:44, Maynard, Chris via Wireshark-dev a écrit : > > It doesn’t seem to be possible to list all dissectors in a web browser > anymore, and those that are listed are populated very slowly. >

[Wireshark-dev] wiki edition request

2019-12-08 Thread Eugène Adell
Hi guys, I would like to add some captures on the dedicated wiki page. My username : EugeneAdell Or if you prefer to edit yourself, the captures are attached to this email (the old CHARGEN protocol, which has some educational value since it's a very simple one) best regards E.A.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector for a custom protocol which starts as HTTP

2019-04-16 Thread Eugène Adell
Hello, in the Wireshark GUI did you try the "Decode As" functionality ? You get it in the right-clic on a packet (or in Analyze menu). You also can have a look at Analyze -> Enabled protocols. see : https://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked/ChUseAnalyzeMenuSection.html Eugene Le mar.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] compilation hangs on Ubuntu

2018-05-14 Thread Eugène Adell
Submitted and validated by Guy Harris. All's fine now. 2018-05-14 20:29 GMT+02:00 Dario Lombardo <lom...@gmail.com>: > Can you submit a change on Gerrit for it? > > On Mon, May 14, 2018, 19:58 Eugène Adell <eugene.ad...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Thanks all for

Re: [Wireshark-dev] compilation hangs on Ubuntu

2018-05-14 Thread Eugène Adell
gt; If you are not going to use the "ninja" privilege escalation detection > program (for example, if it was installed by accident while you were > looking for the "ninja-build" package), you can uninstall it by running > "sudo apt-get remove ninja", and that woul

[Wireshark-dev] compilation hangs on Ubuntu

2018-05-13 Thread Eugène Adell
Hello, I'm facing a problem on my development server (Ubuntu 16.04 hosted on VMWARE) when trying to compile Wireshark. It was working with older versions (2.0 for example), but now it's like the compilation will never end. I installed/updated all the required packages, since version 2.6 seems

[Wireshark-dev] status of ATH dissector

2015-03-30 Thread Eugène Adell
Hello I would like to know the status of this dissector that I have submitted : https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/7807/ best regards ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives: