gt; keep the original change-id in the commit?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Richard Sharpe
> (何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操)
>
As per the wiki, amend your original commit, keeping the Change-Id:
https://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/SubmittingPatch
On 6 July 2017 at 22:47, Guy Harris wrote:
> On Jul 6, 2017, at 1:39 PM, Graham Bloice
> wrote:
>
> > Careful, I only know enough git to work out things have gone wrong and
> very specific ways of getting out of trobule. Glad to be of help.
>
> https://xkcd.
ing that file i.e. "cmake ... ">&1 >cmake.txt"
3. Similarly, can you attach the output of the msbuild step, i.e.
"msbuild ... 2>&1 >build.txt"
--
Graham Bloice
___
ree” solution.
>
>
>
> Thanks and regards…Paul
>
>
Careful, I only know enough git to work out things have gone wrong and very
specific ways of getting out of trobule. Glad to be of help.
>
>
> *From:* Wireshark-dev [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] *On
&
Update master (git pull)
4. Delete your branch (git branch -D "review/unknown/syncro", I think
this is the branch name you have)
5. Get a new copy of the branch (git review -d 19666)
6. Rebase the branch to the latest master (git rebase master)
7. Copy your saved files fro
ll warnings being treated as errors",
> "make[2]: *** [caputils/CMakeFiles/caputils.dir/iface_monitor.c.o]
> Error 1",
> "make[1]: *** [caputils/CMakeFiles/caputils.dir/all] Error 2",
> "make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs...
eader files, they aren't normally
added to a virtual folder.
You could add the headers to a file list with a GLOB (possibly recursive)
and add them to the files for a target (
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34007099/cmake-how-to-show-headers-in-header-files-in-visual-studio-project
)
gWaitForMultipleObjects(). I think that's what's used in the GUI event
>> loops of GTK+ and Qt on Windows.
>>
>> So doing the equivalent of select()/poll() on Windows appears to be a
>> challenge.
>>
>> If anybody has more information than wha
ays
caused problems whenever I've encountered it and I've strongly recommended
folks do NOT do this for a long time.
Another thing to note with CMake builds is that once CMake has located an
external library or function call it will cache that info in CMakeCache.txt
in the
On 19 June 2017 at 19:40, Richard Sharpe
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Richard Sharpe
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Graham Bloice
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 19 June 2017 at 15:02, Jeff Morriss
> wrote:
> &g
whatever package supplies `htmlhelp.xsl`.
>
> Or you can remove the "--nonet" option which is what is preventing it from
> trying to get the file off the 'net (there was recently some
> discussion--but no resolution that I'm aware of--of the wis
On 18 June 2017 at 19:19, Richard Sharpe
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I can't seem to find the Visual Studio Command Prompt on my Windows 10
> system with VS-2013 installed.
>
> Does anyone know how to find or install that thing?
>
>
>From the start menu, locate the Visual Studio 2013 item under the "V
> easily. I think Stig has tried it on
>
> MAC OS too if we want to update that too.
>
> Regards
>
> Anders
>
>
--
Graham Bloice
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archives:https
On 13 June 2017 at 14:18, Richard Sharpe
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Richard Sharpe
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Graham Bloice
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 13 June 2017 at 13:37, Richard Sharpe
> >> wrote
Richard Sharpe
> (何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操)
>
The commands are different because they're intended for two different
purposes.
The ssh command attempts to open a remote shell connection to the gerrit
server, the git clone command uses ssh to clone the wireshark repository.
--
Graham Bloice
__
On 7 June 2017 at 18:52, Graham Bloice wrote:
>
>
> On 7 June 2017 at 18:45, Gerald Combs wrote:
>
>> On 6/7/17 2:03 AM, Graham Bloice wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 7 June 2017 at 00:11, Gerald Combs > > <mailto:ger...@wireshark.org>>
On 7 June 2017 at 18:45, Gerald Combs wrote:
> On 6/7/17 2:03 AM, Graham Bloice wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 7 June 2017 at 00:11, Gerald Combs > <mailto:ger...@wireshark.org>> wrote:
> >
> > We currently build all of our Windows packages using Visu
objections, although I was considering a jump straight to 2017 once I
work out how to get the Qt 5.9 build for 2017.
--
Graham Bloice
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org
On 21 May 2017 at 23:00, Guy Harris wrote:
> On May 21, 2017, at 2:54 PM, Graham Bloice
> wrote:
>
> > It would appear not in a static initializer list. I can do it piecemeal,
> e.g. foo.member = &fff.
>
> Does "piecemeal" really mean "in executable c
On 21 May 2017 at 23:00, Guy Harris wrote:
> On May 21, 2017, at 2:54 PM, Graham Bloice
> wrote:
>
> > It would appear not in a static initializer list. I can do it piecemeal,
> e.g. foo.member = &fff.
>
> Does "piecemeal" really mean "in executable
On 29 April 2017 at 10:29, Gisle Vanem wrote:
> Graham Bloice wrote:
>
> Unsure whether this is related, but MSVC2015 support is regarded as
>> "experimental". The official builds are still using
>> VS2013.
>>
>
> Really. MSVC-2015 is much better rega
whether this is related, but MSVC2015 support is regarded as
"experimental". The official builds are still using VS2013.
> The above "read 21 indicator: S empty value" for me indicates a problem in
> the pipe I/O between tshark and dumpcap. No?
>
>
Are you
coordination with the buildbots for the new
location.
--
Graham Bloice
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/opt
On 24 April 2017 at 16:59, Peter Wu wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 04:41:27PM +0100, Graham Bloice wrote:
> > On 24 April 2017 at 15:28, Pascal Quantin
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2017-04-24 16:25 GMT+02:00 Graham Bloice >:
> > &g
On 24 April 2017 at 15:28, Pascal Quantin wrote:
>
>
> 2017-04-24 16:25 GMT+02:00 Graham Bloice :
>
>>
>>
>> On 24 April 2017 at 14:56, Pascal Quantin
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Peter
>>>
>>> 2017-04-24 15:43 GMT+02:00 Peter Wu :
ill-advised static linking to the CRT).
The Universal CRT was introduced with Windows 10\VS 2015 to allow Windows
Updates to service a portion of the runtime [1]. The part of the CRT that
deals with heaps is now serviced by the OS, so theoretically apps built
with VS2015 or later (with the Wind
exp_pdu_filename = NULL;
> ^
> Is a fix on the way? How could this bug passed through CI ?
>
> Best regards
>
> Rémy
>
>
Caused by commit bce5ec919e2fd197e0042dfabf5186d0d6f6eb47 on change 21239
which didn't go
Has there been any progress on building and testing libxml2 using OpenSUSE?
On 5 April 2017 at 17:52, Graham Bloice wrote:
>
>
> On 5 April 2017 at 14:48, Pascal Quantin wrote:
>
>> Hi Ahmad and Graham,
>>
>> 2017-04-05 15:38 GMT+02:00 Graham Bloice :
>>
x27;) {
int dummy = 0; // breakpoint here.
}
>
> *From:* wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@
> wireshark.org] *On Behalf Of *Graham Bloice
> *Sent:* 14 April 2017 11:55
> *To:* Developer support list for Wireshark
> *Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-dev
the
> exception?
>
>
>
> Thanks and regards…Paul
>
>
I haven't tried this for g_assert() exceptions, but usually you need to
open up Debug -> Windows -> Exception Settings and check more boxes.
--
Graham Bloice
__
mspx?mfr=true>
> > s/en-us/taskkill.mspx?mfr=true
> >
> > - Chris
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-
> > > boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Gerald Combs
> > >
quot;})) to
get the processes owned by the user account running the command, but
there's still too many in there that shouldn't be stopped.
Maybe Get-Process | Where-Object -Property ProcessName -match
".*(Process1|Process2|P
er supported, can you try a supported version, i.e. 2.0
or later? See https://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/LifeCycle for
supported release info.
--
Graham Bloice
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archives:http
On 5 April 2017 at 14:48, Pascal Quantin wrote:
> Hi Ahmad and Graham,
>
> 2017-04-05 15:38 GMT+02:00 Graham Bloice :
>
>>
>>
>> On 5 April 2017 at 14:11, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> I was advised on Gerrit
ments/action/open-download/download/epsg-311-v110-ds-xml-device-
> description/?no_cache=1
> [2] https://github.com/epl-viz/dissector (Needs to be converted back to a
> static dissector)
>
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Graham Bloice > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On
oduce XML device
description files for the EPL dissector such that choosing XML as the input
format is the most sensible choice, or would another format be just as
applicable?
[1]: https://www.zlatkovic.com/libxml.en.html
[2]:
wn again to where I was last looking.
>
>
> ___
> Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wi
Serial ATA Device: APPLE SSD SM0256F, 251 GB
> USB Device: Internal Memory Card Reader
> USB Device: Apple Internal Keyboard / Trackpad
> USB Device: BRCM20702 Hub
> USB Device: Bluetooth USB Host Controller
> Thunderbolt Bus: MacBook Pro, Apple Inc., 17.2
>
>
>
>> *Subject:* [Wireshark-users] R13 S1AP message "Reroute NAS Request" is
>> not decoding completely using 2.3.0
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> R13 baseline S1AP message "RerouteNASRequest" is not decoding completely
>> using 2.3.0. C
eshark-annou...@wireshark.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>
> --
> *Jean-Christophe Manciot*
>
>
Not at all, the GitHub repo is a read only mirror of the main repo at
https://code.wireshark.org/review/wireshark and the mirroring has been
temporarily s
_
> ___
> Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=
>
I'd manually typed the (correct) URL. Never click on links in email -:)
>
>>
>> On 01/20/2017 02:55 PM, Pascal Quantin wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-01-20 15:46 GMT+01:00 Graham Bloice >> <mailto:graham.blo...@trihedral.com>>:
>
e short lifetime of the cert you see is typical of a Let's Encrypt cert
(90 days) and that's what Gerrit is using (for me).
--
Graham Bloice
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archives:https:/
ommit and
> tools/commit-msg files in the .git/hooks folder of your Wireshark clone.
>
> Pascal.
>
>
>
> I think this has me beat. If anyone wants to submit the fix for bug 12973
> I’ll happily provide the details.
>
>
>
> Thanks to Graham and Pascal for the help.
morning and then created my own
> branch:
>
>
>
> C:\Development\wireshark>git branch
>
> * bug12973
>
> master
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@
> wireshark.org ] *On Behalf Of *Graham
> Bloice
> *S
>
>
> C:\Development\wireshark>git branch
>
> * bug12973
>
> master
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@
> wireshark.org ] *On Behalf Of *Graham
> Bloice
> *Sent:* 17 January 2017 18:37
> *To:* Developer s
On 17 January 2017 at 18:32, Graham Bloice
wrote:
>
>
> On 17 January 2017 at 18:04, Paul Offord wrote:
>
>> I’m trying to get git-review working. I think I’ve done everything
>> necessary but this is what I get:
>>
>>
>>
>> C:\Developme
? What does "git branch" show?
Have you checked your git\ssh connection to Gerrit? see
https://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/SubmittingPatches/GitForWindows, but
note you'll need to supply the path to the git version of ssh, i.e. (from
PowerShell)
& "C:\Program Files\Git\usr\bin\ssh
R2%20x64/builds/420/steps/compile_1/logs/stdio
and look for main_toolbar.c
I suspect you've somehow generated a solution without gtk being enabled.
>
>
> Best regards…Paul
>
>
>
> *From:* wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@
> wireshark.org]
still used (see UI\gtkui\Source Files in the solution
explorer) and yes, preferably fix both.
--
Graham Bloice
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsub
one with VS2013 so that's the safe bet. You can
install both side-by-side.
Pro-tip, create a VM using the technology of your choice and use that for
Wireshark Dev (and only Wireshark Dev). This means that when you get a
utput for same input. Therefore it will take a time before I
>> will change features you mentioned.
>>
>> Sincerely yours,
>>
>> Jirka Novak
>>
>
>
--
Graham Bloice
_
t; __
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ___
the same "setup" for the command shell you
were using previously?
3. Delete your build directory and run the CMake generation step again
(or just delete CMakeCache.txt in the build dir). This is necessary
whenever any of the CMake cached paths to libraries and exec
t; These could be avoided but don't affect the ability to build Wireshark
> at all.
>
>
The only warnings you should be getting are those as seen on the x64
buildbot which are actually all pdf doc generation warnings. The current
master has no "code" build warnings on VS2013,
>>
>>> I assume this command should be executed with bash instead of cmd.exe,
>>> what is the magic how commands are executed by cygwin bash instead of
>>> the windows command processore?
>>> Is it legal to set WIRESHARK_CYGWIN_INSTALL_PATH not pointing to
>>>
a to allow skip a sample from automatic testing
>> (because it is for GUI demonstration)?
>>
> For GUI stuff, a idea will be to use Extensive Testing (
> http://www.extensivetesting.org/ )
> it is on my TODO list but never found time to implement...
>
>
With a Window
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 4:52 PM, > > <mailto:joseph.til...@l-3com.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > __ __
>> >
>> > I can’t locate the binaries for the Redhat distribution of
>> wireshark.
>> > I tried getting it for
runa2x.sh using
a non Cygwin bash?
Please re-run your CMake generation step, redirecting the output to a file
and then post the contents of that file.
--
Graham Bloice
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archives:
title be "RPCap Remote interfaces" ?
The current dialog has a "Show" column, I'm assuming that allows users to
show\hide an interface, that doesn't seem to be an option on the new
dialogs.
--
Graham Bloice
__
ther script language
runtime to install and therefore more manual steps in the Windows build env
setup.
While the time saving might be attractive is there that much churn in the
docs that you actually rebuild them a lot?
--
Graham Bloice
_
e website Retrospective page
as soon as
you’re able post-event. If they’re not forthcoming within a
week after the
conference ends, be prepared for relentless pursuit until we have them!
--
Graham Bloice
___
Sent
the build?
>
> Completely blowing away the build directory and starting again seems
> to have fixed it. That was really weird, especially since (to my
> knowledge) I don't even have a source build of libpcap on this
> machine.
>
> Anywho, thanks everyone for the help!
>
help is appreciated
> in these tasks :-)
> --
> Kind regards,
> Peter Wu
>
As a non-lua programmer most of that goes straight over my head, but I'm
intrigued\concerned about methods that are class based (i.e. similar to C++
class static methods ??) and instance based that diffe
MessageId should be an unsigned 64-bit integer. Although the
> [MS-SMB2] document isn’t specific, Microsoft Message Analyzer defines the
> field as UInt64.
>
>
>
> It’s not a big deal but it does mean that filtering for a range of
> MessageIds won’t work as expected for very l
I get contributor rights on the wiki?
>
>
>
> Best regards…Paul
>
>
>
The Wiki would be suitable, probably linked off the ProtocolReference page (
https://wiki.wireshark.org/ProtocolReference).
For editing permissions, see the notices on the Wiki fron
oks/
>
> remote: And then amend the commit:
>
> remote: git commit --amend
>
> remote:
>
> To https://pauloff...@code.wireshark.org/review/wireshark
>
> ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/for/master/bug12892 (missing Change-Id in
> comm
>
> it message footer)
therefore releases.
>
> Gilbert
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Graham Bloice <
> graham.blo...@trihedral.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 12 September 2016 at 20:22, Bill Meier wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/12/2016 3:11 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
>>>
t now from Qt.
I don't think you get the choice of non Open GL for 5.6 onwards.
The docs could be cleaned up a bit here, they should list the recommended
Qt versions for each release and all the examples should be consistent.
Windows i
t of the users I support as they are for
"niche" purposes.
I don't follow the argument that a user actually needing an extcap
interface for their "niche" purpose will find enabling it at all
difficult
e.g. for
PowerShell:
cd path\to\run\Debug
$env:Path += ";path\to\Qt\Bin\dir"
windeployqt --dry-run --debug wireshark.exe
if the output looks reasonable, then try without the "--dry-run".
--
Graham Bloice
ew
helps a lot here, highly recommended.
If you do decide to submit before it's complete, prefix the commit message
with "[WIP]" so that it won't accidentally be merged, the prefix can be
removed from the message when ready.
A bugzilla entry (referenced in the commit message
mbo is Ctrl + K,
Ctrl + C. Use Ctrl + K, Ctrl + U.
>
>
>
>
> *From:* wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@
> wireshark.org] *On Behalf Of *Graham Bloice
> *Sent:* 02 September 2016 08:54
> *To:* Developer support list for Wireshark
> *Subjec
> so, in addition to
>
> > - flexible array members
> > - trailing comma in enum declarations
> > - inline function keyword
>
> we also can use // comments and, apparently, variable declarations in for
> loops, assuming there's no bug that gets in the way
this
> would only work in cases where no encryption is used.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Klaus
>
>
>
>
>
Thanks for your observations, please see the wiki page on submitting
patches (https://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/SubmittingPatches) for info
on how to submi
On 5 August 2016 at 17:13, Graham Bloice
wrote:
> On 5 August 2016 at 17:01, Dario Lombardo
> wrote:
>
>> I updated qt to 5.6.1. After cmake, I get
>>
>> -- The following OPTIONAL packages have not been found:
>> * CAP
>&g
.git>
> * SETCAP
> * YAPP
> * HTMLHelp
>
> is it correct? Should't I have Qt5Core the the "found" list?
>
Have you updated the QT5_BASE_DIR env var for the new location?
>
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Graham Bloice > wrote:
>
>&
On 5 August 2016 at 14:56, Dario Lombardo
wrote:
> What Qt version? I think I've seen that one before.
>>>
>>
>>
> 5.3.2.
>
On Windows we're using 5.6.1
--
Graham Bloice
___
start a new dissection.
>
>
>
> Is there an example plugin that someone can suggest that I can investigate
> to see how this scenario is handled?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> John D.
>
>
>
Is your dissector returning the number of bytes it dissected?
--
Graham Bloice
uot; (default target)
> (112) ->
>(ClCompile target) ->
> C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio
> 12.0\VC\include\algorithm(3050): error C2220: warning treated as error -
> no 'object
>' file generated [c:\Development\wsbuild64\u
[c:\Development\wsbuild64\epa
>n\dfilter\dfilter.vcxproj]
> C:\Development\wireshark\epan\dfilter\dfilter.c(322): error
> C2065: 'scanner' : undeclared identifier [c:\Development\wsbuild64\epa
>n\dfilter\dfilter.vcxproj]
>
>
>"c:\
On 5 August 2016 at 11:21, Guy Harris wrote:
> On Aug 5, 2016, at 2:52 AM, Graham Bloice
> wrote:
>
> > I did look a bit for licensecheck and it appears to be a Perl script
> available as a Debian (and RPM) package devscripts as suggested by João, a
> package for Debian pac
On 5 August 2016 at 10:52, Graham Bloice
wrote:
>
>
> On 5 August 2016 at 10:45, Guy Harris wrote:
>
>> On Aug 5, 2016, at 2:00 AM, João Valverde > .pt> wrote:
>>
>> > On 08/05/2016 08:56 AM, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
>> >> I confirm ;-) (too s
th OS X, either.)
>
>
I did look a bit for licensecheck and it appears to be a Perl script
available as a Debian (and RPM) package devscripts as suggested by João, a
package for Debian package maintainers. As such, it isn't available for
Windows. The checklicenses.py script should
to copy the required
Qt DLL to the staging directory and the update the packaging scripts to put
it into an installer (packaging\nsis\custom_plugins.txt).
--
Graham Bloice
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archi
fecycle?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Yang
>
>
>
I think a solution similar to that used by Linux could be used, i.e.
"Admin-only" mode could be changed to require membership of a local group,
e.g. "Npcap-users", and then NPcapHelper could check that the calling user
l
>
>
I think you should raise an issue, whether thats on the doc or wireshark
I'm not sure.
>
> *From:* wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:
> wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] *On Behalf Of *Graham Bloice
> *Sent:* 10 June 2016 13:28
> *To:* Developer suppor
al Length value?
>
> ·Is this a Wireshark bug (writing incorrect format PCAP-NG files)?
>
>
>
> Thanks and regards…Paul
>
>
>
>
--
Graham Bloice
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
- Other stuff I haven't thought of yet.
Note that I'm not trying to be negative, just trying to make sure we offer
Wireshark users the best possible software.
--
Graham Bloice
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
field extractor
interface is defined in the C code.
>
> *From:* wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:
> wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] *On Behalf Of *Graham Bloice
> *Sent:* 03 June 2016 09:16
> *To:* Developer support list for Wireshark
> *Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-dev] Extr
multiple PDU's in a
single segment. This is where tcp reassembly/desegmentation is used.
--
Graham Bloice
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscr
run the following command to prep for the build:
>
>
>
> C:\Development\Wireshark\build>cmake -D ENABLE_CHM_GUIDES=on -G "Visual
> Studio 12 Win64" ..\
>
>
>
> Any advice much appreciated.
>
>
>
> Best regards…Paul
>
>
>
> Paul Off
• C++ functions that create an appropriate Wireshark
> dissector.
> > • Etc.
>
> ...your work is intended for more purposes than just Wireshark dissection,
> such as protocol implementations,
ere a reason for those functions (all of the
> packet-ssl-utils.h) not to be exported? Or its just because nobody has
> requested it so far?
>
>
>
The latter. Submit a change it it will be merged.
--
Graham Bloice
___
o doesn't really cover patch
submission. The Wiki page on patch submission (
https://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/SubmittingPatches) has much more
help in that area, and for Windows folks in particular, the sub-page
GitForWindows (
https://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/SubmittingPatche
o a
>> message indicating that you can't capture in non-monitor mode as there's a
>> monitor-mode capture in progress.
>>
>> If opt.rfmon *is* set, and one or more instances of the code *above*
>> NWIFI are running (mea
All the Windows buildslaves seem to be offline. Something happened at the
hosting site?
--
Graham Bloice
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe
On 25 April 2016 at 15:35, Graham Bloice
wrote:
> On 25 April 2016 at 15:04, Uli Heilmeier wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> my build system has failed to compile current master branch since commits
>> 13dc91f5b or 9fbd4e6fc.
>>
>> The error is:
Any ideas to fix it?
>
> Cheers
> Uli
>
>
Probably surround lines 2659 & 2660 with a #ifdef HAVE_C_ARES\#endif pair,
and if it works then submit a change to Gerrit.
--
Graham Bloice
___
Sent via:Wiresh
On 25 April 2016 at 11:53, Graham Bloice
wrote:
>
> On 25 April 2016 at 11:38, Anders Broman
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> How are you to download the required support libraries with cmake?
>>
>> With nmake you get a warning if they are out of date and yo
201 - 300 of 999 matches
Mail list logo
