the Petri-Dish
> doesn't have)?
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Maarten Bezemer
> To: wireshark-dev
> Sent: Tue, Dec 16, 2014 5:29 am
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] CMake support out of source plugin compilation
>
> On Thursday 20
Goutte
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Sent: Tue, Dec 16, 2014 9:31 am
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] CMake support out of source plugin compilation
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 3:24 PM, wrote:
I've kicked off the Petri-Dish for most (all?) of the chang
On Tuesday 16 December 2014 09:24:50 mman...@netscape.net wrote:
> Am I correct in understanding most of the patches introduce "optional"
> features, so they shouldn't break existing cmake user setups (of platforms
> the Petri-Dish doesn't have)?
Yes, the patches should add new, optional out-of-so
; Sent: Tue, Dec 16, 2014 5:29 am
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] CMake support out of source plugin compilation
>
> On Thursday 20 November 2014 14:37:26 you wrote:
> > On Thursday 20 November 2014 13:26:29 Bálint Réczey wrote:
> > > I was waiting for Jörg to comment on the c
riginal Message-
From: Maarten Bezemer
To: wireshark-dev
Sent: Tue, Dec 16, 2014 5:29 am
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] CMake support out of source plugin compilation
On Thursday 20 November 2014 14:37:26 you wrote:
> On Thursday 20 November 2014 13:26:29 Bálint Réczey wrote:
> > I was
On Thursday 20 November 2014 14:37:26 you wrote:
> On Thursday 20 November 2014 13:26:29 Bálint Réczey wrote:
> > I was waiting for Jörg to comment on the change, but I have submitted
> > it instead:
> > https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/5316/
>
> I saw, also that my two related patches are ab
On Thursday 20 November 2014 13:26:29 Bálint Réczey wrote:
> 2014-11-20 9:53 GMT+01:00 Maarten Bezemer :
> > On Thursday 13 November 2014 15:15:26 you wrote:
> >> On Thursday 13 November 2014 13:56:26 Graham Bloice wrote:
> >> > While I'm all for making life easier for devs, if no-one else has
> >>
2014-11-20 9:53 GMT+01:00 Maarten Bezemer :
> On Thursday 13 November 2014 15:15:26 you wrote:
>> On Thursday 13 November 2014 13:56:26 Graham Bloice wrote:
>> > While I'm all for making life easier for devs, if no-one else has
>> > identified this as a need, i.e. only you find it worthwhile, then
On 20 November 2014 10:51, Alexis La Goutte
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Graham Bloice
> wrote:
> > On 20 November 2014 08:53, Maarten Bezemer
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thursday 13 November 2014 15:15:26 you wrote:
> >> > On Thursday 13 November 2014 13:56:26 Graham Bloice wrote:
>
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Graham Bloice
wrote:
> On 20 November 2014 08:53, Maarten Bezemer
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday 13 November 2014 15:15:26 you wrote:
>> > On Thursday 13 November 2014 13:56:26 Graham Bloice wrote:
>> > > While I'm all for making life easier for devs, if no-one else
On Thursday 20 November 2014 09:01:03 Graham Bloice wrote:
> On 20 November 2014 08:53, Maarten Bezemer
> > Is there anything left for me to do or to explain?
> > I would like gain some momentum either direction (approved or abandoned),
> > so I know whether my current (out of source) plug-in impl
On Thursday 13 November 2014 15:15:26 you wrote:
> On Thursday 13 November 2014 13:56:26 Graham Bloice wrote:
> > While I'm all for making life easier for devs, if no-one else has
> > identified this as a need, i.e. only you find it worthwhile, then we will
> > end up with stuff not generally used
On 20 November 2014 08:53, Maarten Bezemer
wrote:
> On Thursday 13 November 2014 15:15:26 you wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 November 2014 13:56:26 Graham Bloice wrote:
> > > While I'm all for making life easier for devs, if no-one else has
> > > identified this as a need, i.e. only you find it worthw
On Thursday 13 November 2014 13:56:26 Graham Bloice wrote:
> On 13 November 2014 13:21, Maarten Bezemer
>
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This email is (a bit) long, as I am trying to explain the Wireshark
> > patches I
> > send, as requested by Graham Bloice.
>
> Thanks for this, I was trying to u
On 13 November 2014 13:21, Maarten Bezemer
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This email is (a bit) long, as I am trying to explain the Wireshark
> patches I
> send, as requested by Graham Bloice.
>
Thanks for this, I was trying to understand what was going on from all the
fragments.
>
> First of all: I am n
Hello,
This email is (a bit) long, as I am trying to explain the Wireshark patches I
send, as requested by Graham Bloice.
First of all: I am new to Wireshark and its development. Furthermore I am also
new to cmake development/scripting. So I'll explain my context/background in
this to make cl
16 matches
Mail list logo
