[Wireshark-dev] GSoC 2013: Process Information

2013-04-25 Thread Ashish
Hi, By mistake I sent a reply to wireshark-dev without editing the subject. Please find my reply below. On Apr 24, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org wrote: Polling the system's TCP and UDP connection tables is trivial but its usefulness is limited since it assumes that

Re: [Wireshark-dev] GSoC 2013: Process Information

2013-04-25 Thread Anders Broman
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Ashish Sent: den 25 april 2013 16:11 To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Subject: [Wireshark-dev] GSoC 2013: Process Information Hi, By mistake I sent a reply to wireshark-dev without editing

[Wireshark-dev] GSoC 2013: Process Information

2013-04-24 Thread Ashish
Hi all, This mail is in reply to the mail sent (below) by Kostadin. I'm contacting you with an intent to request some further info about the task Process Information as found on the Wireshark's Google Summer of Code 2013 project page. After a short research on the matter, I cant help but

Re: [Wireshark-dev] GSoC 2013: Process Information

2013-04-24 Thread Gerald Combs
On 4/24/13 3:26 AM, Ashish wrote: Hi all, This mail is in reply to the mail sent (below) by Kostadin. I'm contacting you with an intent to request some further info about the task Process Information as found on the Wireshark's Google Summer of Code 2013 project page.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] GSoC 2013: Process Information

2013-04-24 Thread Anders Broman
Gerald Combs skrev 2013-04-24 20:20: On 4/24/13 3:26 AM, Ashish wrote: Hi all, This mail is in reply to the mail sent (below) by Kostadin. I'm contacting you with an intent to request some further info about the task Process Information as found on the Wireshark's Google

Re: [Wireshark-dev] GSoC 2013: Process Information

2013-04-24 Thread Guy Harris
On Apr 24, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org wrote: Polling the system's TCP and UDP connection tables is trivial but its usefulness is limited since it assumes that your interesting traffic has a corresponding table entry at the instant you poll. This may not be the case

Re: [Wireshark-dev] GSoC 2013: Process Information

2013-04-24 Thread Guy Harris
On Apr 24, 2013, at 12:10 PM, Anders Broman a.bro...@bredband.net wrote: Process info is entirely useless when capturing of a mirror/pawn port ...or in monitor mode on Wi-Fi, or in promiscuous mode on a non-switched Ethernet, or with some type of passive tapping hardware (Endace DAG cards,

[Wireshark-dev] [ GSoC 2013: Process information in Wireshark ]

2013-04-08 Thread Ashish Raste
Hi all, I'm a CS student from National University of Singapore. I came through the GSoC project ideas of Wireshark and I'm interested to know/learn about having Wireshark tell the Process information of the packets captured. I mainly wanted to ask you the following: 1. Could you suggest me some

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [ GSoC 2013: Process information in Wireshark ]

2013-04-08 Thread Christopher Maynard
Ashish Raste rasteashish@... writes: 1. Could you suggest me some pointers/references specifically related to knowing the process info of the packets so that I can start working/thinking along those lines. For starters, you might want to have a look at this bug report: